Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Add GitHub workflow to run code linting checks daily and on every push or pull request. #4

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues commented Oct 23, 2024

Description

As the PR title says.

Validation performed

  • The workflow was triggered when I pushed to my fork.
  • Running workflows were cancelled when I pushed again.
  • Violations caused the workflow to fail.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for code linting checks.
    • The workflow runs automatically on pull requests and daily, with options for manual triggering.
    • Supports multiple operating systems for enhanced compatibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow named code-linting-checks.yaml has been added to the repository. This workflow is designed to trigger on pull requests, pushes, and daily at a specified time, with the option for manual initiation. It includes a single job that runs linting checks on two operating systems (macOS and Ubuntu), utilizing a matrix strategy. The workflow encompasses steps for checking out the repository, setting up Python, installing necessary tools, and executing linting commands.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/code-linting-checks.yaml Added a new GitHub Actions workflow for linting checks with a matrix strategy.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/lint.yaml (2)

1-10: Consider using a more descriptive workflow name

The current name "lint" is quite generic. A more descriptive name like "code-quality-checks" or "lint-validation" would better communicate the workflow's purpose to other developers.

-name: "lint"
+name: "code-quality-checks"

41-47: Improve version logging structure

The current version logging could be more structured for better readability in the workflow logs.

-      - name: "Log tool versions"
-        run: |-
-          md5sum --version
-          python --version
-          tar --version
-          task --version
+      - name: "Log tool versions"
+        run: |
+          echo "=== Tool Versions ==="
+          echo "MD5SUM: $(md5sum --version | head -n1)"
+          echo "PYTHON: $(python --version)"
+          echo "TAR: $(tar --version | head -n1)"
+          echo "TASK: $(task --version)"
+          echo "===================="
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb31f83 and 7dd08bb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

Comment on lines 34 to 36
- name: "Install task"
run: "npm install -g @go-task/cli"

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add caching for npm installation

Adding caching for npm installations can significantly improve workflow execution time.

Add this step before the task installation:

      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '20'
          cache: 'npm'

Comment on lines 30 to 33
- uses: "actions/setup-python@v5"
with:
python-version: "3.8"

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update Python version

Python 3.8 is approaching end-of-life. Consider using a more recent version like 3.11 for better performance and security.

-          python-version: "3.8"
+          python-version: "3.11"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- uses: "actions/setup-python@v5"
with:
python-version: "3.8"
- uses: "actions/setup-python@v5"
with:
python-version: "3.11"

Comment on lines 11 to 18
permissions: {}

concurrency:
group: "${{github.workflow}}-${{github.ref}}"

# Cancel in-progress jobs for efficiency
cancel-in-progress: true

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Define explicit minimum required permissions

While an empty permissions block follows the principle of least privilege, it's better to explicitly define the minimum permissions required for linting. This improves security transparency and documentation.

-permissions: {}
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  pull-requests: read
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
permissions: {}
concurrency:
group: "${{github.workflow}}-${{github.ref}}"
# Cancel in-progress jobs for efficiency
cancel-in-progress: true
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
concurrency:
group: "${{github.workflow}}-${{github.ref}}"
# Cancel in-progress jobs for efficiency
cancel-in-progress: true

Comment on lines 19 to 24
jobs:
lint:
strategy:
matrix:
os: ["macos-latest", "ubuntu-latest"]
runs-on: "${{matrix.os}}"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Pin OS versions for reproducibility

Using latest tags can lead to unexpected behaviour when GitHub updates the runner images. Consider pinning to specific versions.

-        os: ["macos-latest", "ubuntu-latest"]
+        os: ["macos-13", "ubuntu-22.04"]
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
jobs:
lint:
strategy:
matrix:
os: ["macos-latest", "ubuntu-latest"]
runs-on: "${{matrix.os}}"
jobs:
lint:
strategy:
matrix:
os: ["macos-13", "ubuntu-22.04"]
runs-on: "${{matrix.os}}"

tar --version
task --version

- run: "task lint:check"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance lint check step with error handling and artifacts

The lint check step should upload results as artifacts and provide better error context.

-      - run: "task lint:check"
+      - name: "Run lint checks"
+        run: |
+          mkdir -p lint-results
+          task lint:check > lint-results/lint-output.txt 2>&1 || {
+            echo "::error::Lint checks failed. Check the artifacts for details."
+            exit 1
+          }
+      - name: "Upload lint results"
+        if: always()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+        with:
+          name: lint-results-${{ matrix.os }}
+          path: lint-results/
+          retention-days: 7
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- run: "task lint:check"
- name: "Run lint checks"
run: |
mkdir -p lint-results
task lint:check > lint-results/lint-output.txt 2>&1 || {
echo "::error::Lint checks failed. Check the artifacts for details."
exit 1
}
- name: "Upload lint results"
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: lint-results-${{ matrix.os }}
path: lint-results/
retention-days: 7

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7dd08bb and 083d17f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code-linting-checks.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/code-linting-checks.yaml (2)

13-18: Excellent concurrency configuration!

The concurrency settings are well-configured to prevent redundant runs and optimize CI resources by cancelling outdated jobs.


48-48: Verify task file existence.

The workflow assumes the existence of a task lint:check command.

Let's verify the task file configuration:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the task configuration.


I notice that the lint tasks are included from a separate file. Let me check that file.


Task lint:check exists and is properly configured

The task file structure is verified and confirms that:

  • The main Taskfile.yml includes lint tasks from lint-tasks.yml
  • The lint:check task exists through the namespace inclusion and executes the yml-check task
  • The linting setup includes proper virtual environment management and YAML linting with yamllint
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Taskfile.yml and lint task definition
echo "Checking for Taskfile.yml..."
if [ -f "Taskfile.yml" ]; then
  echo "Found Taskfile.yml. Checking for lint:check task..."
  grep -A 5 "lint:check:" Taskfile.yml
else
  echo "Taskfile.yml not found"
fi

Length of output: 242


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any Taskfile variants and their content
echo "Searching for Taskfile variants..."
fd -i taskfile
echo -e "\nChecking content of found files:"
fd -i taskfile -x cat {}

Length of output: 531


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the lint tasks file
echo "Checking lint-tasks.yml content:"
cat lint-tasks.yml

Length of output: 1241

Comment on lines +34 to +36
- name: "Install task"
run: "npm install -g @go-task/cli"

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve task CLI installation.

The global npm installation might require elevated privileges and lacks version pinning.

Consider using a specific version and installing locally:

-run: "npm install -g @go-task/cli"
+run: "npm install @go-task/[email protected]"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: "Install task"
run: "npm install -g @go-task/cli"
- name: "Install task"
run: "npm install @go-task/[email protected]"

- cron: "15 0 * * *"
workflow_dispatch:

permissions: {}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding minimum required permissions.

The empty permissions block follows the principle of least privilege, but the workflow might need specific permissions to post lint check results as PR comments.

Consider adding these minimum required permissions:

-permissions: {}
+permissions:
+  pull-requests: write  # To post lint results as PR comments
+  contents: read       # To checkout code
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
permissions: {}
permissions:
pull-requests: write # To post lint results as PR comments
contents: read # To checkout code

Comment on lines +30 to +33
- uses: "actions/setup-python@v5"
with:
python-version: "3.8"

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a more recent Python version.

Python 3.8 is approaching end-of-life. Consider using Python 3.11 or 3.12 for better performance and newer features.

 with:
-  python-version: "3.8"
+  python-version: "3.12"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- uses: "actions/setup-python@v5"
with:
python-version: "3.8"
- uses: "actions/setup-python@v5"
with:
python-version: "3.12"

Comment on lines +20 to +24
lint:
strategy:
matrix:
os: ["macos-latest", "ubuntu-latest"]
runs-on: "${{matrix.os}}"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding Windows to the matrix.

The matrix strategy effectively covers macOS and Ubuntu, but consider adding Windows to ensure lint checks pass across all major platforms.

 matrix:
-  os: ["macos-latest", "ubuntu-latest"]
+  os: ["macos-latest", "ubuntu-latest", "windows-latest"]
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
lint:
strategy:
matrix:
os: ["macos-latest", "ubuntu-latest"]
runs-on: "${{matrix.os}}"
lint:
strategy:
matrix:
os: ["macos-latest", "ubuntu-latest", "windows-latest"]
runs-on: "${{matrix.os}}"

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues changed the title ci: Add GitHub workflow to run lint checks daily and on every push or pull request. ci: Add GitHub workflow to run code linting checks daily and on every push or pull request. Oct 23, 2024
@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues merged commit 5f180f8 into y-scope:main Oct 23, 2024
5 checks passed
@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues deleted the add-lint-workflow branch October 23, 2024 12:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant