Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Select YAML files for linting using an include rather than exclude list. #8

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues commented Oct 24, 2024

Description

There are usually more YAML files to exclude (e.g., those in the generated files for a CMake build) than include in a repo, so it's better to select the YAML files to lint using an include list.

Validation performed

  • Workflow succeeded.
  • Added a lint violation in a YAML file.
  • Validated task lint:check detected it.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced the YAML linting command for improved functionality and specificity.
    • Added a new section in the README.md to guide contributors on incorporating files into the project's linting rules.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the lint-tasks.yaml file by updating the command for the yml task to enhance the linting process for YAML files. The previous command for yamllint has been replaced with a more detailed invocation that specifies a configuration file and explicitly lists multiple target files and directories for linting. The overall structure and dependencies of the tasks remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
lint-tasks.yaml Updated yml task command from yamllint --strict . to yamllint --config-file "tools/yscope-dev-utils/lint-configs/.yamllint.yml" --strict .gersemirc .github/ .yamllint.yaml lint-tasks.yaml taskfile.yaml.
README.md Added a new section titled "## Adding files" outlining instructions for incorporating specific file types into the linting rules.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
lint-tasks.yaml (2)

39-46: Consider adding a comment explaining the include list strategy.

To help future maintainers understand the rationale, consider adding a comment above the yamllint command explaining why specific files are included rather than using a catch-all approach.

Add this comment above the command:

+    # Explicitly list YAML files to lint, excluding generated files (e.g., from CMake builds)
     yamllint \

39-46: Consider adding a maintenance note in the repository documentation.

Since we're now using an explicit include list, it would be helpful to document this approach in the repository's contribution guidelines or development documentation.

Would you like me to help create a documentation update that explains:

  • The YAML linting strategy
  • How to add new YAML files to the lint list
  • Which types of YAML files should/shouldn't be linted
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 03a98d9 and bf17818.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • lint-tasks.yaml (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +39 to +46
yamllint \
--config-file "tools/yscope-dev-utils/lint-configs/.yamllint.yml" \
--strict \
.gersemirc \
.github/ \
.yamllint.yaml \
lint-tasks.yaml \
taskfile.yaml
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Configuration file is missing and YAML coverage needs adjustment

The verification revealed two critical issues:

  • The specified configuration file at tools/yscope-dev-utils/lint-configs/.yamllint.yml does not exist
  • The current linting command includes paths that don't exist in the repository:
    • .gersemirc is not found
    • .yamllint.yaml is not found
    • The only YAML files present are taskfile.yaml and lint-tasks.yaml

Please:

  1. Create the missing configuration file at the specified path or update the path to the correct location
  2. Update the yamllint command to include only existing files:
yamllint \
  --config-file "tools/yscope-dev-utils/lint-configs/.yamllint.yml" \
  --strict \
  .github/ \
  lint-tasks.yaml \
  taskfile.yaml
🔗 Analysis chain

The approach to use an include list is sound, but let's verify the configuration.

The change from a catch-all approach to an explicit include list is a good practice, especially for repositories with generated YAML files.

Let's verify the configuration and coverage:


The previous script showed that the config file was missing. Let's verify the actual paths and structure to provide accurate feedback about the configuration file location and YAML files that need linting.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify configuration file existence and identify potential missing YAML files

# Test 1: Verify config file exists
echo "Checking for config file..."
if [ ! -f "tools/yscope-dev-utils/lint-configs/.yamllint.yml" ]; then
    echo "Error: Config file not found"
    exit 1
fi

# Test 2: Find all YAML files that might need to be included
echo "Checking for potential missing YAML files..."
fd -e yml -e yaml --exclude build --exclude tools/yscope-dev-utils/lint-configs/.yamllint.yml \
  --exec echo "Found YAML file: {}"

Length of output: 207


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the actual path structure and find YAML files
echo "Repository YAML files:"
find . -type f \( -name "*.yml" -o -name "*.yaml" \) -not -path "*/\.*" -not -path "*/build/*"

echo -e "\nRepository structure for tools directory:"
ls -R tools/

Length of output: 351

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

17-18: Consider enhancing the YAML file instructions.

While the current instruction is clear, it would be helpful to provide an example of how to add a YAML file to the yamllint command.

Consider adding an example like:

  * **YAML**. If adding a YAML file (regardless of its extension), add it as an argument to the
  `yamllint` command in [lint-tasks.yaml](lint-tasks.yaml).
+ For example:
+ ```yaml
+ # In lint-tasks.yaml
+ yamllint -c .yamllint.yml path/to/your-new-file.yml other-files/*.yaml
+ ```
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf17818 and b176f4c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

14-19: LGTM! Clear and well-placed documentation addition.

The new section effectively communicates the requirement to manually add YAML files to the linting rules, which aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of using an include list approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant