Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Add boilerplate CMake project and Taskfile tasks to lint CMake files. #7

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues commented Oct 24, 2024

Description

  • Adds the lint:cmake-check and lint:cmake-fix tasks for formatting CMakeLists.txt files.
  • Adds a boilerplate CMake project that we can use to validate the new tasks.

Validation performed

  • Added extra indentation in CMakeLists.txt
  • task lint:cmake-check detected it.
  • task lint:check detected it.
  • task lint:cmake-fix fixed it.
  • Added an extra newline in CMakeLists.txt
  • task lint:fix fixed it.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new configuration file for YAML linting with customizable settings.
    • Added a build configuration for the project "spider" with CMake, including a default executable.
    • New CMake linting tasks added to streamline development processes.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README to include new CMake linting tasks.
  • Dependencies

    • Added a new dependency on gersemi for enhanced linting capabilities.
  • Code

    • Introduced a simple C++ program that outputs "Hello, world!" to the console.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several changes, including the creation of a new configuration file .gersemirc for YAML linting settings, a CMakeLists.txt file to configure the build system for a project named "spider," and the addition of new linting tasks in lint-tasks.yaml. Furthermore, it updates the README.md to document the new CMake linting tasks, adds a dependency in lint-requirements.txt, and introduces a simple C++ program in src/spider/spider.cpp.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gersemirc New configuration file created for YAML linting settings, disabling line length rule, max length 100, and schema reference included.
CMakeLists.txt New file to configure the build system for "spider," specifying CMake version, project details, default build type, and executable target.
README.md Linting section modified to include new CMake linting tasks: lint:cmake-check and lint:cmake-fix.
lint-requirements.txt New dependency added: gersemi>=0.16.2.
lint-tasks.yaml New tasks cmake-check and cmake-fix added; cmake task updated to include dependencies and internal settings.
src/spider/spider.cpp New file created containing a simple C++ program that outputs "Hello, world!".

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf15a8e and 03ddcfb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)
  • lint-tasks.yaml (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • CMakeLists.txt
  • lint-tasks.yaml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
CMakeLists.txt (2)

12-18: Consider adding compile command export rationale.

While enabling compile commands export is good for tooling support (e.g., clang-tidy, IDE integration), consider documenting which specific tools require this setting in your project.

 # Enable exporting compile commands
+# Required for clang-tidy analysis and IDE integration
 set(CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS

1-34: Consider adding install rules and package configuration.

For a complete CMake setup, consider adding:

  • Installation rules for the executable
  • Package version configuration
  • Documentation for build and installation

Would you like me to provide an example of these additions?

README.md (1)

33-38: Consider enhancing the CMake linting documentation.

To make the documentation more helpful for contributors, consider:

  • Adding examples of common CMake formatting issues that the linter catches
  • Mentioning which CMake linter is being used (e.g., gersemi)
  • Referencing the .gersemirc configuration file for customizing the linting rules
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 915a8a9 and cf15a8e.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .gersemirc (1 hunks)
  • CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • lint-requirements.txt (1 hunks)
  • lint-tasks.yaml (3 hunks)
  • src/spider/spider.cpp (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .gersemirc
  • src/spider/spider.cpp
🔇 Additional comments (7)
lint-requirements.txt (1)

1-1: LGTM! The addition of gersemi is appropriate.

The gersemi dependency will enable CMake file formatting capabilities, which aligns with the PR objectives.

Let's verify the version compatibility:

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify Python version compatibility in the repository to ensure it meets gersemi's requirements.


Let me check for any workflow files or CI configurations that might specify Python versions.


The gersemi dependency version is appropriate and compatible

The specified version of gersemi (>=0.16.2) requires Python >=3.8, which is a reasonable requirement for modern Python development. Since there are no explicit Python version constraints found in the repository, and gersemi is being used as a development tool for CMake formatting, this dependency should work well in most Python environments.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify gersemi version compatibility with other tools
# Test: Check if gersemi version is available in PyPI and compatible with Python versions
curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/gersemi/0.16.2/json" | jq -r '.info.requires_python'

Length of output: 87


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for Python version requirements in the repository
fd "requirements.*\.txt|pyproject.toml|setup.py|\.python-version" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 125


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check GitHub workflow files and CI configurations for Python version specifications
fd "\.github|\.gitlab-ci\.yml|tox\.ini" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 66

CMakeLists.txt (1)

1-10: LGTM: Project configuration follows CMake best practices.

The project configuration is well-structured with:

  • Clear version requirement with justification (Ubuntu 22.04)
  • Proper project name and version specification
  • Explicit language declarations
README.md (1)

33-38: LGTM! The table formatting and task descriptions are clear and consistent.

The new CMake linting tasks are well-documented and follow the existing table structure.

lint-tasks.yaml (4)

9-9: LGTM! Task list modifications are well-structured.

The new CMake tasks are properly integrated into the existing check and fix task lists, maintaining consistent naming conventions and logical ordering.

Also applies to: 14-14


17-23: LGTM! The cmake-check task is well-defined.

The task properly depends on the virtual environment and correctly utilizes the internal cmake task with appropriate flags.


24-30: LGTM! The cmake-fix task follows consistent patterns.

The task mirrors the structure of cmake-check while appropriately using the --in-place flag for fixing operations.


59-59: LGTM! Efficient virtual environment handling.

The addition of run: "once" is a good optimization that prevents unnecessary recreation of the virtual environment.

Comment on lines +20 to +30
# Set the default build type to Release if not specified
if(NOT CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE)
set(SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE "Release")
message(STATUS "No build type specified. Setting to '${SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE}'.")
set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
"${SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE}"
CACHE STRING
"Choose the type of build."
FORCE
)
endif()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding build type options validation.

The build type configuration could benefit from validating allowed values and documenting available options.

 if(NOT CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE)
     set(SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE "Release")
     message(STATUS "No build type specified. Setting to '${SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE}'.")
     set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
         "${SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE}"
         CACHE STRING
-        "Choose the type of build."
+        "Choose the type of build (Debug/Release/RelWithDebInfo/MinSizeRel)."
         FORCE
     )
+    # Provide drop-down in CMake GUIs
+    set_property(CACHE CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE PROPERTY STRINGS
+        "Debug" "Release" "RelWithDebInfo" "MinSizeRel")
 endif()
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# Set the default build type to Release if not specified
if(NOT CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE)
set(SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE "Release")
message(STATUS "No build type specified. Setting to '${SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE}'.")
set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
"${SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE}"
CACHE STRING
"Choose the type of build."
FORCE
)
endif()
# Set the default build type to Release if not specified
if(NOT CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE)
set(SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE "Release")
message(STATUS "No build type specified. Setting to '${SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE}'.")
set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE
"${SPIDER_DEFAULT_BUILD_TYPE}"
CACHE STRING
"Choose the type of build (Debug/Release/RelWithDebInfo/MinSizeRel)."
FORCE
)
# Provide drop-down in CMake GUIs
set_property(CACHE CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE PROPERTY STRINGS
"Debug" "Release" "RelWithDebInfo" "MinSizeRel")
endif()

CMakeLists.txt Outdated
Comment on lines 32 to 34
add_executable(spider)
target_compile_features(spider PRIVATE cxx_std_20)
target_sources(spider PRIVATE src/spider/spider.cpp)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider organizing target properties more systematically.

The target configuration could be enhanced with:

  • Organized property settings
  • Include directories specification
  • Compile definitions/options
 add_executable(spider)
+
+# Specify C++ standard through a target property
 target_compile_features(spider PRIVATE cxx_std_20)
+
+# Group source files for better organization
+set(SPIDER_SOURCES
+    src/spider/spider.cpp
+)
+target_sources(spider PRIVATE ${SPIDER_SOURCES})
+
+# Add include directories if needed
+target_include_directories(spider
+    PRIVATE
+        ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/src
+)

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

lint-tasks.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines 41 to 48
cmake:
internal: true
requires:
vars: ["FLAGS"]
cmd: |-
. "{{.G_LINT_VENV_DIR}}/bin/activate"
find . -name CMakeLists.txt -print0 | xargs -0 gersemi {{.FLAGS}}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider enhancing the cmake task's robustness.

While the implementation is functional, consider these improvements:

  1. Add directory exclusions (e.g., build directories, third-party code)
  2. Add error handling for the case when no CMakeLists.txt files are found

Here's a suggested improvement:

-      find . -name CMakeLists.txt -print0 | xargs -0 gersemi {{.FLAGS}}
+      find . -name CMakeLists.txt \
+           -not -path "*/build/*" \
+           -not -path "*/third_party/*" \
+           -print0 | \
+      xargs -0 -r gersemi {{.FLAGS}}

The -r flag for xargs ensures it won't run if no files are found.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
cmake:
internal: true
requires:
vars: ["FLAGS"]
cmd: |-
. "{{.G_LINT_VENV_DIR}}/bin/activate"
find . -name CMakeLists.txt -print0 | xargs -0 gersemi {{.FLAGS}}
cmake:
internal: true
requires:
vars: ["FLAGS"]
cmd: |-
. "{{.G_LINT_VENV_DIR}}/bin/activate"
find . -name CMakeLists.txt \
-not -path "*/build/*" \
-not -path "*/third_party/*" \
-print0 | \
xargs -0 -r gersemi {{.FLAGS}}

@kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant