Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: File renaming for consistency and clarity: #6

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues commented Oct 23, 2024

  • Use the .yaml extension for YAML files.
  • Use taskfile.yaml instead of Taskfile.yml.
  • Rename the PR title checks workflow file.

Description

  • We're trying to be consistent with naming our YAML files according to the YAML spec, so this PR fixes some inconsistencies.
  • This PR also renames Taskfile.yml to taskfile.yaml so that it's more consistent with how we name other YAML files.
  • This PR also renames the PR title workflow file to something clearer.

Validation performed

Workflow succeeded.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow name from "pr-title" to "pr-title-checks."
    • Adjusted source file references in linting tasks to reflect new naming conventions.
    • Changed file extension references for lint tasks from .yml to .yaml to ensure consistency.

- Use the .yaml extension for YAML files.
- Use taskfile.yaml instead of Taskfile.yml.
- Rename the PR title checks workflow file.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to three configuration files related to GitHub Actions and linting tasks. The workflow file .github/workflows/pr-title-checks.yaml has been renamed and retains its trigger conditions and job structure. The lint-tasks.yaml file updates a source file reference due to a change in naming convention. Lastly, the taskfile.yaml file updates the reference to the lint task file, changing its extension. Overall, the changes primarily involve renaming and updating file references without altering the underlying logic.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/pr-title-checks.yaml Renamed workflow from "pr-title" to "pr-title-checks"; no changes to triggers or job structure.
lint-tasks.yaml Updated source file reference in venv task from Taskfile.yml to taskfile.yaml.
taskfile.yaml Updated lint task reference from lint-tasks.yml to lint-tasks.yaml; no other changes made.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 763a3ca and 00c1b06.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/pr-title-checks.yaml (1 hunks)
  • lint-tasks.yaml (1 hunks)
  • taskfile.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/pr-title-checks.yaml
  • taskfile.yaml
🧰 Additional context used

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ tasks:
CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5"
OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_LINT_VENV_DIR}}"
sources:
- "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/Taskfile.yml"
- "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/taskfile.yaml"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Additional YAML extension inconsistencies found

There are still inconsistent .yml extensions in the codebase that should be standardized:

  • tools/yscope-dev-utils/taskfiles/utils.yml is included in taskfile.yaml
  • tools/yscope-dev-utils/lint-configs/.yamllint.yml is referenced in .yamllint.yaml

These files appear to be in a tools directory, but for complete consistency, these references should also be updated to use the .yaml extension.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Let's verify consistency across the codebase.

The file reference update aligns with the standardization objectives for YAML file extensions and naming conventions.

Let's verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase:


Let me check the content of these files to better understand the remaining .yml references and verify if they need attention.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of taskfile.yaml and .yaml extensions

# Test 1: Check for any remaining .yml references
echo "Checking for remaining .yml references..."
rg -l '\.yml' --type yaml

# Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old Taskfile.yml
echo "Checking for references to old Taskfile.yml..."
rg -l 'Taskfile\.yml'

# Test 3: Verify consistent casing of taskfile.yaml
echo "Checking for inconsistent casing of taskfile.yaml..."
rg -l -i 'taskfile\.ya?ml'

Length of output: 436


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of taskfile.yaml for .yml references
echo "=== Content of taskfile.yaml ==="
cat taskfile.yaml

# Check content of .yamllint.yaml
echo -e "\n=== Content of .yamllint.yaml ==="
cat .yamllint.yaml

Length of output: 619

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant