Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[INFRA] Ignore www.incf.org link check.. unlikely to go away (hopefully) #2030

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

yarikoptic
Copy link
Collaborator

@yarikoptic yarikoptic commented Jan 16, 2025

Currently check fails

URL        `https://www.incf.org/'
Name       `INCF'
Parent URL file:///home/circleci/project/site/introduction.html, line 1795, col 2
Real URL   https://www.incf.org/
Check time 0.084 seconds
Result     Error: SSLError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='www.incf.org', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: unable to get local issuer certifica...

possibly due to outdated collection of root certificates in the env where testing?

dunno, but we better address it since it brings overall CI to red quite often, causing fatigue and increasing likeliness to skip important issues.

edit: also sorted lines there for consistency etc

Currently check fails

    URL        `https://www.incf.org/'
    Name       `INCF'
    Parent URL file:///home/circleci/project/site/introduction.html, line 1795, col 2
    Real URL   https://www.incf.org/
    Check time 0.084 seconds
    Result     Error: SSLError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='www.incf.org', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: unable to get local issuer certifica...

possibly due to outdated collection of root certificates in the env where testing?

dunno, but we better address it since it brings overall CI to red quite
often, causing fatigue and increasing likeliness to skip important issues.
Would be easier to find one, and to add one without thinking much
where etc
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.45%. Comparing base (c16ab8d) to head (619f48b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2030   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.45%   82.45%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1499     1499           
=======================================
  Hits         1236     1236           
  Misses        263      263           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ha -- it is as green as it can get ATM if I get it right. @Remi-Gau @effigies , may be a quick merge and close

with it for now?

@yarikoptic yarikoptic added the exclude-from-changelog This item will not feature in the automatically generated changelog label Jan 21, 2025
yarikoptic added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
Since this way it keeps it "grey" on PRs, which causes all other
matrix runs and workflows to be expanded and thus requiring more
mental cycles to understand that it is actually all good.

This way it should be collapsed.  This commit sits on top of
#2030
to ensure no other workflows fail ATM
@effigies effigies merged commit 4218b87 into bids-standard:master Jan 21, 2025
27 checks passed
effigies pushed a commit to yarikoptic/bids-specification that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
Since this way it keeps it "grey" on PRs, which causes all other
matrix runs and workflows to be expanded and thus requiring more
mental cycles to understand that it is actually all good.

This way it should be collapsed.  This commit sits on top of
bids-standard#2030
to ensure no other workflows fail ATM
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
exclude-from-changelog This item will not feature in the automatically generated changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants