Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] [PR:16608] [dhcp_relay] Remove skip dhcp_relay test when dhcp_server is enabled #16653

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
  • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

This skip condition would take effect on all test cases under dhcp_relay folder, which would skip dhcpv6_relay tests too. But we don't want to skip it when dhcp_server is enabled.
When dhcp_server is enabled, dhcpv4_relay would be disabled, and dhcpv4_relay test is only running in m0 and t0, which wouldn't enable dhcp_server

How did you do it?

Remove skip check

How did you verify/test it?

Run tests

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

…onic-net#16608)

What is the motivation for this PR?
This skip condition would take effect on all test cases under dhcp_relay folder, which would skip dhcpv6_relay tests too. But we don't want to skip it when dhcp_server is enabled.
And dhcpv4_relay test is only running in m0 and t0, which wouldn't enable dhcp_server

How did you do it?
Remove skip check

How did you verify/test it?
Run tests
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #16608

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit b37d5d9 into sonic-net:202411 Jan 23, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants