Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade golangci-lint to v1.60 #1062

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

Upgrade golangci-lint to v1.60 #1062

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

iwahbe
Copy link
Member

@iwahbe iwahbe commented Aug 28, 2024

This is necessary to accommodate providers who require go1.23, since previous versions of golangci-lint do not support go1.23.

This is necessary to accommodate providers who require go1.23, since previous versions of
golangci-lint do not support go1.23.
@iwahbe iwahbe requested a review from a team August 28, 2024 09:27
@iwahbe iwahbe self-assigned this Aug 28, 2024
@iwahbe iwahbe added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 28, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 3131a49 Aug 28, 2024
5 checks passed
@iwahbe iwahbe deleted the iwahbe/upgrade-golangci-lint branch August 28, 2024 09:29
danielrbradley added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
- Upgrade golangci-lint to v1.60 (#1062) surfaced new warnings about deprecations.
- The configuration option `run.skip-files` is deprecated, please use `issues.exclude-files`.
- The linter named "megacheck" is deprecated. It has been split into: gosimple, staticcheck, unused.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
- Upgrade golangci-lint to v1.60 (#1062) surfaced new warnings about
deprecations.
- The configuration option `run.skip-files` is deprecated, please use
`issues.exclude-files`.
- The linter named "megacheck" is deprecated. It has been split into:
gosimple, staticcheck, unused.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants