refactor(centerpoint, pointpainting): rearrange parameters for ML models and packages

[badai-nguyen]

Description

• For the issue Separate the param.yaml file for ML model parameters and ML model handle node parameters #6590
• This PR should be merged after refactor: update ML model param files download autoware#4533 and refactor(centerpoint, pointpainting): rearrange ML model and package params autoware_launch#915 merged.

Releated Link

TIER IV INTERNAL LINK

Tests performed

• Make sure ML model yaml files are downloaded to autoware_data directory by updating autoware and running ./setup-dev-env.sh from autoware/ directory.
• Confirmed by logging_simulator that centerpoint or pointpainting correctly reflect the parameters defined in autoware_launch and in data_path

1. Testing using centerpoint:
   ros2 launch autoware_launch logging_simulator.launch.xml map_path:=$HOME/sample_autoware/sample-map vehicle_model:=sample_vehicle sensor_model:=sample_sensor_kit control:=false planning:=false perception:=true localization:=false perception_mode:=camera_lidar_fusion centerpoint_model_name:=centerpoint

2. Testing using centerpoint_tiny
   ros2 launch autoware_launch logging_simulator.launch.xml map_path:=$HOME/sample_autoware/sample-map vehicle_model:=sample_vehicle sensor_model:=sample_sensor_kit control:=false planning:=false perception:=true localization:=false perception_mode:=camera_lidar_fusion centerpoint_model_name:=centerpoint_tiny
   

3. Tesing using pointpainting
   ros2 launch autoware_launch logging_simulator.launch.xml map_path:=$HOME/sample_autoware/sample-map vehicle_model:=sample_vehicle sensor_model:=sample_sensor_kit control:=false planning:=false perception:=true localization:=false perception_mode:=camera_lidar_fusion lidar_detection_model:=pointpainting
   

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[kminoda]

Thank you for the PR!!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 14.78%. Comparing base (35642a6) to head (8973229).
Report is 79 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 8973229 differs from pull request most recent head 70f4388. Consider uploading reports for the commit 70f4388 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6591      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   14.93%   14.78%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files        1944     1925      -19     
  Lines      134061   132724    -1337     
  Branches    39891    39521     -370     
==========================================
- Hits        20027    19623     -404     
+ Misses      91735    91127     -608     
+ Partials    22299    21974     -325     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	0.00% <ø> (?)
total	14.78% <ø> (-0.16%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from a8364b4

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Shin-kyoto]

@badai-nguyen
Can you resolve conflicts?

[badai-nguyen]

@Shin-kyoto @knzo25
cc @miursh @kminoda @tzhong518

I have updated and rearrange some parameters. I also updated the logging_simulator testing results in Tests performed.
Could you review this PR again.

[miursh]

LGTM

[knzo25]

LGTM

[badai-nguyen]

@Shin-kyoto
I fixed your change request so could you review it again?

BTW, I have merged autowarefoundation/autoware#4533 tested this change on Evaluator.

• Lidar_based_detection: https://evaluation.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/e9737a3c-8796-5e53-9acb-a0e51557ff5c?project_id=prd_jt
• Camera_lidar_fusion based detection: https://evaluation.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/00948d19-f04d-5daa-a6e1-e3d6071e6b1f?project_id=prd_jt

[Shin-kyoto]

LGTM

[xmfcx]

@badai-nguyen This file has a wrong extension. (.schemal.json)

Might be intentional too, I don't know.

Maybe related to autowarefoundation/autoware-github-actions#293

[badai-nguyen]

@xmfcx Thank you for your comment. It was my mistake. I will fix it.