-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a case for active_only box on the sync_status page #17413
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
PRT Result
|
f' and organization_id = {function_sca_manifest_org.id}' | ||
f' and resource_id = {repo.id}' | ||
' and resource_type = Katello::Repository', | ||
max_tries=12, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this enough tries with the kickstart repos? I feel like they take about 10 minutes to sync unless my broker vm's are slow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The kickstarts usually take less than the normal ones with on_demand
policy, this one in particular took ~17 seconds, so we should have ~100 seconds for safety.
max_tries=12, | ||
search_rate=10, | ||
) | ||
session.browser.refresh() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this refresh neccessary because we are on same page i.e sync_status
page and check box Active only
doesn't reflect changes on page dynamically?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup it is. It also follows the steps to reproduce from that bug.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non blocking question.
Ack.
Problem Statement
There is a z-stream bug which needs to be automated, see the issue bellow for details.
TLDR: We need to verify the functionality of the Active only check-box on the Sync Status page.
Solution
This PR adds such UI test case.
It needs some Airgun changes too.
Related Issues
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-30291
PRT test Cases example