Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test : added tests for lib/widgets/agenda_item_tile.dart #2663

Conversation

may-tas
Copy link
Contributor

@may-tas may-tas commented Dec 11, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • added all possible test cases for lib/widgets/agenda_item_tile.dart

Issue Number:

Fixes #2602

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

Screenshot 2024-12-12 at 2 33 53 AM

Summary

  • This PR includes tests for lib/widgets/agenda_item_tile.dart
  • Introduced new test cases for the ExpandableAgendaItemTile widget to enhance testing coverage.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced test coverage for the ExpandableAgendaItemTile widget.
    • Introduced tests for handling attachments, including validation of image display and interaction.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Added checks to ensure no UI elements are displayed for empty categories, attachments, and URLs.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the test coverage for the ExpandableAgendaItemTile widget by adding new test cases in the agenda_item_tile_test.dart file. Specifically, it introduces tests for scenarios where the EventAgendaItem has empty lists and a new group of tests focused on attachments. These tests verify the correct display of UI elements, handling of images from base64 strings, and interaction with attachments.

Changes

File Change Summary
test/widget_tests/widgets/agenda_item_tile_test.dart Added tests for handling empty lists in EventAgendaItem and new "Attachment Tests" for validating image display and interaction.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Write unittests for lib/widgets/agenda_item_tile.dart (#2602)

Possibly related issues

Suggested reviewers

  • noman2002
  • Dante291

Poem

In the garden of code, we play,
Adding tests to brighten the day.
With attachments in view,
And empty lists too,
Our widget shines bright, come what may! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
test/widget_tests/widgets/agenda_item_tile_test.dart (3)

159-166: Consider moving test data to constants file

The base64 encoded test images could be moved to a separate test constants file for better maintainability and reusability across other test files.


167-194: Add accessibility tests for attachment images

Consider adding tests to verify that images have appropriate semantic labels for screen readers.

Example test to add:

testWidgets('Attachments have semantic labels', (WidgetTester tester) async {
  await tester.pumpWidget(createExpandableAgendaItemTile());
  await tester.pumpAndSettle();
  
  await tester.tap(find.text('Test Agenda Item'));
  await tester.pumpAndSettle();
  
  expect(
    find.bySemanticsLabel('Attachment 1'),
    findsOneWidget,
  );
});

Line range hint 92-362: Outstanding test coverage meeting PR objectives

The test suite successfully achieves comprehensive coverage with:

  • Edge case handling (empty lists)
  • Thorough attachment functionality testing
  • Error scenarios
  • User interaction verification
  • Layout and styling validation

This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of achieving complete test coverage for the ExpandableAgendaItemTile widget.

Consider organizing the test file into smaller, focused files if it grows larger, such as:

  • agenda_item_tile_basic_test.dart
  • agenda_item_tile_attachment_test.dart
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c94742 and 44a6a79.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/widget_tests/widgets/agenda_item_tile_test.dart (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/widget_tests/widgets/agenda_item_tile_test.dart (2)

92-112: Well-structured test for empty lists scenario!

Good coverage of edge cases by verifying that UI elements are not rendered when their corresponding data lists are empty.


196-361: Excellent test coverage for attachments functionality!

The test suite thoroughly covers:

  • Grid layout properties
  • Image styling and border radius
  • Error handling for invalid attachments
  • Full-screen view interactions and properties

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.91%. Comparing base (7c94742) to head (44a6a79).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2663      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             95.68%   95.91%   +0.23%     
====================================================
  Files                   187      187              
  Lines                  9887     9887              
====================================================
+ Hits                   9460     9483      +23     
+ Misses                  427      404      -23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Cioppolo14 Cioppolo14 requested review from literalEval and removed request for palisadoes December 12, 2024 02:52
@may-tas
Copy link
Contributor Author

may-tas commented Dec 12, 2024

Please review my PR.
Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants