Unittest for lib/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page.dart #2686
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new key for the last name text field in the Changes
Possibly related issues
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
test/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart (3)
62-64: Consider negative test case for missing image.Although you check widgets' presence, consider a test for the scenario where no image is selected or uploaded yet. This ensures robust coverage of edge cases.
66-86: Add test coverage for the "Gallery" button.Currently, your test hits the camera button. It might be beneficial to replicate a similar tap verification flow for the gallery option to ensure symmetry of coverage.
await tester.tap(addRemoveButton); await tester.pumpAndSettle(); expect(find.byType(BottomSheet), findsOneWidget); final cameraButton = find.byKey(const Key('selectCamera')); final galleryButton = find.byKey(const Key('selectGallery')); expect(cameraButton, findsOneWidget); expect(galleryButton, findsOneWidget); + // Also tap gallery button to confirm functionality + await tester.tap(galleryButton); + await tester.pumpAndSettle();
88-99: Suggestion: Validate user text input.You check for the presence of text fields but do not test user entry or how the viewModel handles the updated text. This can catch issues with form validation, data binding, or state management.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart (2)
11-29: Great setup structure with createEditProfilePage.
The approach of wrapping EditProfilePage in a MaterialApp with mock dependencies is very clean. This ensures consistent environment and localization setup. Great work!
112-120: Double-check default values for first & last name in the view model.
Your test verifies the call with 'Test' and 'User' but doesn't confirm how these values are assigned. Consider using tester.enterText() to ensure coverage of manual user input paths.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart (1)
504-561: Consider verifying real ViewModel usage in tests.
The test setsmodel.imageFilelocally after pumping the widget, but the widget may use a different instance ofEditProfilePageViewModel. This discrepancy might cause partial or misleading coverage in actual scenarios. Consider injecting or mocking the same model instance that the widget under test consumes to ensure consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pubspec.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
lib/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page.dart(1 hunks)pubspec.yaml(2 hunks)test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
lib/views/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page.dart (1)
183-183: Great addition for testability.
Adding a unique key for the last name text field improves test coverage and widget identification, aligning with code coverage goals.
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart (1)
468-502: Solid focus behavior test.
Verifying focus acquisition on tap ensures robust and user-friendly interactions. The approach looks good.
pubspec.yaml (2)
13-13: Check compatibility with higher Dart SDK.
Raising the upper SDK limit to 3.22.3 can unlock more features, but confirm no dependency breaks or warnings.
81-81: New dependency added: win32.
Ensure it’s truly needed across all platforms or conditionally excluded for non-Windows environments to avoid unintended overhead.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2686 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 96.22% 96.28% +0.06%
====================================================
Files 189 189
Lines 9994 9994
====================================================
+ Hits 9617 9623 +6
+ Misses 377 371 -6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Please make code rabbit approve your changes |
MayankJha014
force-pushed
the
edit_profile_test1
branch
from
0976ca3 to
07530ac
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Nitpick comments (49)
lib/services/fund_service.dart (2)
59-59: Correct the typographical error
In the error message, “funss” should be spelled “funds”.- print('Error fetching funss: $e'); + print('Error fetching funds: $e');
33-62: Use structured logging or custom error handling
All methods currently useException. For production systems, consider a structured logging approach and/or more specific exception classes to improve observability and debugging.Also applies to: 72-107, 109-150, 152-172, 174-194, 196-217
lib/view_model/after_auth_view_models/funds_view_models/fund_view_model.dart (2)
173-173: Correct repeated “methoud” typos
Several documentation comments use “methoud” instead of “method”.- /// methoud to sort funds. + /// method to sort funds. - /// methoud to sort Campaigns. + /// method to sort Campaigns. - /// methoud to sort Pledges. + /// method to sort Pledges. - /// methoud to search Funds. + /// method to search Funds.Also applies to: 187-187, 203-203, 219-219
136-145: Consolidate error handling and logging
Thesecatchblocks useAlso applies to: 166-171, 313-316, 367-368, 383-384, 401-402
test/widget_tests/newsfeed_test.dart (1)
37-46: Well-structured widget tests
These tests verify UI elements under different screen sizes and states. Consider adding tests for scenarios where some content is actually displayed, ensuring coverage for typical use cases.Also applies to: 48-60, 62-74, 76-89
test/model_tests/funds/fund_pledges_test.dart (1)
8-53: Great coverage for valid JSON object
The test for correct JSON parsing thoroughly checks each data field. The usage of typed fields (Campaign, User) is good. Consider adding negative tests (e.g., invalid date formats, incorrect object shapes) to confirm the resilience offromJson.lib/models/funds/fund_pledges.dart (1)
34-46: Typed mapping forCampaignandUser
The direct casting ((json['campaigns'] as List<dynamic>?)?.map((e) => e as Campaign)) might cause runtime exceptions if the elements are not indeedCampaigninstances. Consider adding a robust type check or transform logic in case the API returns unexpected formats.- campaigns: (json['campaigns'] as List<dynamic>?) - ?.map((e) => e as Campaign) - .toList(), + campaigns: (json['campaigns'] as List<dynamic>?) + ?.where((e) => e is Campaign) + .map((e) => e as Campaign) + .toList(),lib/models/funds/fund_campaign.dart (1)
50-58: Typed mapping forpledges
Similar toPledgeusage, consider type-checking each element in case the API returns unexpected data.- pledges: (json['pledges'] as List<dynamic>?)?.map((e) => e as Pledge).toList(), + pledges: (json['pledges'] as List<dynamic>?) + ?.where((e) => e is Pledge) + .map((e) => e as Pledge) + .toList(),lib/services/image_service.dart (3)
14-14: Document newly introduced methods consistently.The doc comment for
decodeBase64is helpful. Ensure all new public methods, including those introduced in this file, follow the same documentation structure for consistency.
76-86: Validate MIME type detection before base64 encoding.Checking MIME type to prefix the base64 string is a neat approach. However, consider logging or otherwise signaling if the fallback path (without prefix) is taken, so debugging is easier when file types are unrecognized.
113-164: Add support for additional image formats if necessary.The
_getMimeTypemethod checks well-known formats (JPEG, PNG, GIF, BMP, WebP). If the application needs to handle more formats (e.g., TIFF, HEIC), extend it. Otherwise, consider listing any unsupported or unknown types in logs for debugging.test/views/after_auth_screens/profile/profile_page_test.dart (1)
1-1: Local test directive note.
// ignore_for_file: talawa_api_docis suppressing Talawa doc warnings. Ensure the doc warnings are addressed or truly unnecessary. If documentation can be added, remove this ignore comment.test/views/after_auth_screens/funds/fund_screen_test.dart (4)
34-43: Using global setup/teardown for test environment is well-organized.
testSetupLocator(),registerServices(), andunregisterServices()insetUpAllandtearDownAllkeep tests consistent. Label dependencies and mock objects clearly for improved test clarity.
45-52: Verifying screen rendering and text presence is valid.Checking for
FundScreenand the'Funds'text is a good initial test. Consider adding negative tests (ensuring certain text is not present in different states) to improve coverage.
54-84: Mocking and verifying search functionality is comprehensive.Using
mockFundServiceto supply test data ensures the UI logic is correct. Confirm edge-case coverage (e.g., empty search results or special characters).
86-101: Dropdown testing is user-friendly.Verifying default and alternative sorting options fosters a clear user experience. Optionally, test selecting each item and confirming the effect on search results.
test/views/after_auth_screens/funds/fundraising_campaigns_screen_test.dart (4)
18-33: Consider abstracting the localization setup for broader reuse.You have correctly set up localization delegates in the
MaterialApp, but this logic is repeated across tests in your codebase. You might benefit from a shared helper method that sets upMaterialAppwith the desired locale and localization delegates.
48-54: Add negative test cases for screen presence.The test suite validates that the
CampaignsScreenis indeed displayed. It would be beneficial to include a test scenario checking that unexpected elements are not shown. This helps ensure that the screen does not inadvertently display stale or unrelated widgets.
56-82: Verify behavior for unmatched search queries.While you test the search displaying an expected campaign, consider adding a check for a random or unmatched search string to ensure that the UI handles "no results found" scenarios gracefully.
84-101: Ensure default value for sort dropdown is tested.You open and confirm multiple dropdown items, which is good. Add an assertion for the initial default value or ordering logic if relevant, so you can detect regressions if the default changes unexpectedly.
test/widget_tests/widgets/pledge_card_test.dart (2)
78-103: Add test coverage for currency symbol or localization specifics.The test already checks for displayed numeric values. If your app localizes currency formatting, consider extending your tests to verify the correct currency symbol or locale-based formatting.
122-136: Validate partial-invalid dates scenario.You correctly test null start and end dates. Another edge test might involve only startDate or only endDate being null to confirm your date label or
N/Afallback logic is consistent in these partial cases.test/service_tests/image_service_test.dart (2)
25-28: Potential confusion withthrowExceptionvs. returning null.When
base64String == throwException,decodeBase64returns null. This pattern is somewhat conflated with the namethrowException. To avoid confusion, consider clarifying the naming or approach (e.g.,invalidBase64constant) so you can keep exceptions separate from null returns.
88-113: Add handling for non-image files inconvertToBase64().You do test a fake path, returning an empty string. For real usage, consider whether you want a warning or exception for attempts to convert non-image files. This is more of a design question: is returning "" the best response, or should it be an error?
test/utils/fund_queries_test.dart (1)
38-59: Future-proofing: ensure sorting parameters remain consistent.When you compare the strings, be aware that reformatting or additional fields can break the test. It’s usually good to keep these queries in a single source of truth and reference that same string in tests, so refactors are easier.
lib/widgets/agenda_item_tile.dart (1)
132-140: Check for null-safety and performance overhead.
- Forced unwrapping
imageData!may cause a runtime error ifdecodeBase64unexpectedly returns null. Though you have a try-catch block, consider an additional null-safe guard to avoid potential exceptions.- Repeated calls to
imageService.decodeBase64in a loop could be memory-intensive with large attachments. If feasible, decode once per attachment or handle the data more lazily.- onTap: () => _showFullScreenImage(context, imageData!), + if (imageData != null) { + onTap: () => _showFullScreenImage(context, imageData), + }test/service_tests/fund_service_test.dart (1)
1-250: Comprehensive test coverage noted.
- Positive path coverage: Each method (
getFunds,getCampaigns,getPledgesByCampaign,createPledge,updatePledge,deletePledge) is tested with expected result checks. This is excellent for confidence in correctness.- Mock usage: Reliance on
mockitofor GraphQL responses is appropriate and keeps tests self-contained.- Potential addition: Consider adding failure or edge-case tests (e.g., null responses, network errors, or incomplete data) to ensure robust error handling.
test/views/after_auth_screens/funds/fund_pledges_screen_test.dart (2)
110-125: Search functionality
ClearingallPledgespost-search is a realistic scenario test. Make sure to verify visual or functional changes (like an empty list) if that’s part of the acceptance criteria.
127-142: Dropdown sort functionality
Checking each dropdown item presence is good. You might also test whether selecting a sort option actually re-sorts the pledges.test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/fund_view_models/fund_view_model_test.dart (3)
14-22: Enhance teardown steps to ensure clean testing environment.You’ve correctly registered services in
setUpAlland unregistered intearDownAll. In certain cases, it may be beneficial to reset mocks or re-register services insidetearDownorsetUpto avoid potential cross-test interference in more complex scenarios.
42-58: Add negative or failure tests for fetchFunds.Currently, only “success” scenarios are tested. To reinforce reliability, consider verifying how the model behaves when
FundService.getFundsfails or returns an empty list, so you can confirm the model’s error handling or fallback pathways.
60-75: Consider partial match and edge case tests.The
searchFundsmethod test checks a single search term ("health"). Include tests for partial matches (e.g., "Hea" or "hea") or entirely unmatched terms to confirm robust filtering logic.lib/views/after_auth_screens/funds/funds_screen.dart (1)
111-119: Display more user-friendly feedback when no funds exist.The code returns a simple “No funds in this organization.” message. For a better user experience, consider guiding the user on how to create a new fund or improve the UI.
lib/views/after_auth_screens/funds/fund_pledges_screen.dart (3)
136-139: Consider adopting a more descriptive variable name
Here,amountorpledgeAmountmight be more descriptive than justsum, which helps clarify what is being aggregated.
48-57: Extract the Column layout into a dedicated widget
The layout block in lines 48-57 is quite large. For maintainability, consider extracting it into a separate widget to reduce the build method’s complexity.
306-324: Improve empty states
You have two empty states: one forallPledgesand another foruserPledges. Depending on the business logic, consider clarifying messaging or combining them if appropriate, so users fully understand why no pledges are shown.lib/views/pages/newsfeed/newsfeed.dart (1)
119-123: Assess repeated getPosts calls
Each call toaddLikeorremoveLiketriggersgetPostsagain. Depending on user frequency, repeated fetching might degrade performance. You might optimize by updating local state to avoid full re-fetches on each like/unlike.test/widget_tests/widgets/update_pledge_dialogue_box_test.dart (3)
149-169: Optional additional test for removing multiple pledgers
You currently test removing a single pledger. Consider adding a scenario where multiple pledgers exist and users remove them in sequence, verifying correct behavior each time.
332-351: Improve negative-path testing
You test incomplete data by removing all pledgers and clearing the amount. You might add a test for invalid numeric input (e.g., negative amounts or non-numeric strings) to ensure the form’s validation is robust.
418-452: Perform boundary tests for changed fields
Your_getChangedFields Testsare extensive. Consider adding boundary tests for cases where fields are just at the edge conditions (e.g., zero or minimal date range) to confirm_getChangedFieldscorrectly identifies them.lib/widgets/update_pledge_dialogue_box.dart (1)
324-341: Highlight the action button
When the “Update” button is disabled, some users might miss it. Consider providing a tooltip or disabled button styling that clarifies how the user can enable it.lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/edit_agenda_item_page.dart (1)
333-333: Confirm image data usage is safe with non-null assertion.
Here,imageData!is used directly. Ensure you’ve validated that this is never null. IfdecodeBase64can return null, consider a null-safe approach or handle the fallback scenario.-Image.memory( - imageData!, - fit: BoxFit.cover, - width: double.infinity, - height: double.infinity, -), +if (imageData != null) { + return Image.memory( + imageData, + fit: BoxFit.cover, + width: double.infinity, + height: double.infinity, + ); +} else { + return const Icon(Icons.broken_image, color: Colors.red); +}lib/views/after_auth_screens/funds/fundraising_campaigns_screen.dart (3)
31-32: Consider error handling for fetch failures.
InonModelReady, ifmodel.fetchCampaigns(widget.fundId)fails, you might want to display an error or provide a retry option.
48-72: Watch for performance overhead under large campaign sets.
When there are many campaigns, text search in memory may be expensive. Consider debouncing or server-side search if the data set grows large.
165-191:CampaignCardstructure is clear, but watch for repetitive or large components.
If you plan to display many campaigns, ensure it’s still performant. Reusable components or lazy loading might be needed if the list grows large.lib/view_model/main_screen_view_model.dart (1)
263-266: Icons re-labeled forFunds.
Renaming from profile to funds is understandable for your new design. Make sure any references to the old “profile” are cleaned up across the codebase.test/helpers/test_helpers.dart (1)
239-251: Ensure robust tests with this new service mock.The new
getAndRegisterFundService()function is consistent with the other get-and-register methods. Remember to validate that the mock is being properly unregistered before re-registration. Consider adding more stubbing behaviors if the new service is used heavily in the test suite.CONTRIBUTING.md (2)
95-97: Add language specification to code blockThe fenced code block should specify the language for proper syntax highlighting.
- ``` + ```shell flutter format --set-exit-if-changed . ```🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
95-95: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
51-51: Fix grammar and formatting issuesSeveral grammar issues need attention:
- Missing articles and commas in multiple sentences
- Incorrect capitalization of "Slack"
-Make sure you are following issue report guidelines here before creating any new issues on Talawa project. +Make sure you are following the issue report guidelines here before creating any new issues on the Talawa project. -Pull Request guidelines is best resource to follow +The Pull Request guidelines are the best resource to follow -As a last resort the Admins would be responsible +As a last resort, the Admins would be responsible -After making changes you can add them +After making changes, you can add them -After adding the changes you need to commit +After adding the changes, you need to commit -Here branch name must be name of the branch +Here, the branch name must be the name of the branch -to join our slack channel. +to join our Slack channel.Also applies to: 55-55, 77-77, 98-98, 99-99, 101-101, 234-234
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~51-~51: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... here before creating any new issues on Talawa project. #### Pull Requests [Pull Req...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
🛑 Comments failed to post (9)
lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart (1)
86-115: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the search results, I can now provide the final response:
Missing test coverage for avatar and navigation in OrganizationFeed
While there are comprehensive tests for CircleAvatar components in other parts of the application (like custom_avatar_test.dart and member_name_tile_test.dart), the OrganizationFeed's avatar and its navigation functionality lack proper test coverage. Specifically:
- No tests verify the avatar's fallback behavior when userConfig.currentUser.image is null
- No tests validate the navigation to ProfilePage when tapping the avatar IconButton
- No tests ensure the correct rendering of the user's profile image when available
Action items:
- Add test case in organization_feed_test.dart to verify default avatar rendering with blue background and person icon when image is null
- Add test case to verify network image rendering when userConfig.currentUser.image is available
- Add test case to verify navigation to ProfilePage with correct key and homeModel props when tapping the avatar
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify avatar fallback and test coverage.
ThisIconButtonintelligently checks the presence of a user profile image. Ifimageis null, it shows a default icon in a blue circle; otherwise, it uses the fetched image. Ensure you have automated tests that:
- Validate rendering the default avatar when
userConfig.currentUser.imageis null.- Validate rendering the user's actual image if available.
- Verify that tapping the avatar navigates to the
ProfilePage.You can confirm the test coverage by searching for the relevant test scenario in your codebase and verifying the existence of tests for navigation to
ProfilePage.
Let me generate additional scripts to search for tests related to the avatar and navigation functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Script to verify that the new icon avatar is tested # 1. Look for tests navigating to `ProfilePage` from `OrganizationFeed`. # 2. Confirm coverage for the fallback icon scenario. # Search in test files for references to OrganizationFeed or its appBar. rg "OrganizationFeed" -A 15 --glob "test/**/*.dart" # Search for references to ProfilePage route navigation in test files. rg "Navigator.push" -A 5 --glob "test/**/*.dart"Length of output: 46334
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for tests related to avatar/profile image and navigation to ProfilePage # Look for CircleAvatar tests and profile navigation tests in organization feed tests # Search for CircleAvatar related tests rg "CircleAvatar" -A 10 --glob "test/**/*.dart" # Search for ProfilePage navigation tests rg "ProfilePage.*key.*UserProfile" -A 10 --glob "test/**/*.dart" # Search for tests verifying navigation from IconButton rg "IconButton.*ProfilePage" -A 10 --glob "test/**/*.dart" # Search for tests related to userConfig.currentUser.image rg "userConfig.*currentUser.*image" -A 10 --glob "test/**/*.dart"Length of output: 26829
lib/services/fund_service.dart (1)
137-139: 💡 Codebase verification
Add null check for empty campaign results
Based on the code context, while there is a null check for
result.data, there's no validation for empty campaign results before accessingcampaigns[0]. This could indeed cause an index out of range error if the GraphQL query returns an empty list. The suggested fix is appropriate:
- In
lib/services/fund_service.dart, line 137-139:- final pledgesJson = (campaigns[0]['pledges'] as List<dynamic>) + if (campaigns.isEmpty) { + throw Exception('No campaigns returned for this ID'); + } + final pledgesJson = (campaigns[0]['pledges'] as List<dynamic>)The function already has a try-catch block that will properly handle and rethrow the exception with a user-friendly message "Failed to load pledges".
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify indexing for empty campaign results
Accessingcampaigns[0]may cause an out-of-range error if the list is empty. Consider validating that the list is non-empty before accessing the first element.- final pledgesJson = (campaigns[0]['pledges'] as List<dynamic>) + if (campaigns.isEmpty) { + throw Exception('No campaigns returned for this ID'); + } + final pledgesJson = (campaigns[0]['pledges'] as List<dynamic>)
Let me verify the concern by checking the surrounding code context and any error handling that might be in place.
Let me try to get more context around this code, particularly about error handling and the GraphQL query.
Let me try one more search pattern to get the full context of this function.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the file and show surrounding context rg -B 10 -A 10 "getFundraisingCampaigns.*campaigns\[0\]" lib/services/fund_service.dartLength of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for any error handling patterns around this code ast-grep --pattern 'try { $$$ getFundraisingCampaigns $$$ }'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's any validation before accessing campaigns[0] rg -B 5 -A 5 "campaigns\[0\]" lib/services/fund_service.dartLength of output: 446
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get more context around this function rg -B 20 -A 20 "getFundraisingCampaigns.*result\.data" lib/services/fund_service.dartLength of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for any null checks or error handling patterns ast-grep --pattern 'if (result.data == null) { $$$ }'Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any GraphQL query definition rg -l "getFundraisingCampaigns.*query" --type dartLength of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the file content with a broader context rg -B 30 -A 30 "pledgesJson = \(campaigns\[0\]\['pledges'\]" lib/services/fund_service.dartLength of output: 2028
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for any error handling or null checks with a different pattern ast-grep --pattern 'if ($campaigns.isEmpty) { $$$ }'Length of output: 56
lib/locator.dart (1)
95-96: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix the spelling typo in
fundServcie.
The property namefundServcieis spelled incorrectly. Rename it tofundServicefor clarity and consistency.- final fundServcie = locator<FundService>(); + final fundService = locator<FundService>();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.///GetIt for FundService. final fundService = locator<FundService>();lib/widgets/add_pledge_dialogue_box.dart (1)
216-234:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd safer parsing for the amount field.
Currently, the code directly calls
double.parse(_amountController.text). If a user enters a non-numeric string, this parsing could throw an exception. Consider using a try-catch or regex validation to handle malformed input gracefully.if (_formKey.currentState!.validate() && _startDate != null && _endDate != null && _selectedPledgers.isNotEmpty) { - widget.onSubmit({ - 'amount': double.parse(_amountController.text), - ... - }); + double? amount; + try { + amount = double.parse(_amountController.text); + } catch (e) { + // Show snackBar or set error state + ScaffoldMessenger.of(context).showSnackBar( + const SnackBar(content: Text('Invalid numeric value for amount')), + ); + return; + } + + widget.onSubmit({ + 'amount': amount, + ... + }); Navigator.of(context).pop(); } else { ScaffoldMessenger.of(context).showSnackBar( const SnackBar(content: Text('Please fill all fields')), ); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
lib/views/pages/newsfeed/newsfeed.dart (1)
57-72:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent potential memory leaks or race conditions
You're adding a listener to theScrollController. Ensure you remove it indisposeto prevent memory leaks. This is especially important for large lists if the widget can be discarded.@@ -398,0 +399,5 @@ + @override + void dispose() { + scrollController.dispose(); + super.dispose(); + }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
lib/widgets/update_pledge_dialogue_box.dart (1)
65-69: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize frequent setState calls
Every keystroke in_amountControllertriggerssetState. For large forms, it could degrade performance. You can mitigate this by using adebounceor verifying meaningful differences before calling setState.CONTRIBUTING.md (3)
5-6:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove duplicate introduction paragraph
The introduction paragraph appears twice. Please remove the duplicate content at lines 5-6.
-Thank you for your interest in contributing to Talawa. Regardless of the size of the contribution you make, all contributions are welcome and are appreciated. -
59-64:
⚠️ Potential issueStandardize branch naming and fix typo
There are inconsistencies in branch naming and a typo:
- Text refers to both 'master' and 'main' branches
- Typo in 'teesting'
- The alpha branch information appears to be outdated
-For Talawa, we had employed the following branching strategy to simplify the development process and to ensure that only stable code is pushed to the `master` branch: - -- `develop`: For unstable code and bug fixing -- `alpha-x.x.x`: for stability teesting -- `master`: Where the stable production ready code lies +For Talawa, we employ the following branching strategy to simplify the development process and to ensure that only stable code is pushed to the `main` branch: + +- `develop`: For unstable code and bug fixing +- `main`: Where the stable production-ready code lies (default branch)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.For Talawa, we employ the following branching strategy to simplify the development process and to ensure that only stable code is pushed to the `main` branch: - `develop`: For unstable code and bug fixing - `main`: Where the stable production-ready code lies (default branch)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~61-~61: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...hed to themasterbranch: -develop: For unstable code and bug fixing - `alp...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~63-~63: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...y teesting -master: Where the stable production ready code lies For Talawa, we had employed ...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
224-231: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update internship information and fix heading structure
- The year references are outdated (2021)
- Heading levels are inconsistent (h4 instead of h3)
-#### GSoC +### GSoC -If you are participating in the 2021 Summer of Code, please read more about us and our processes [here](https://palisadoesfoundation.github.io/talawa-docs/docs/internships/gsoc/gsoc-introduction) +If you are participating in the Summer of Code program, please read more about us and our processes [here](https://palisadoesfoundation.github.io/talawa-docs/docs/internships/gsoc/gsoc-introduction) -#### GitHub Externship +### GitHub Externship -If you are participating in the 2021 GitHub Externship, please read more about us and our processes [here](https://palisadoesfoundation.github.io/talawa-docs/docs/internships/github/github-introduction) +If you are participating in the GitHub Externship program, please read more about us and our processes [here](https://palisadoesfoundation.github.io/talawa-docs/docs/internships/github/github-introduction)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.### GSoC If you are participating in the Summer of Code program, please read more about us and our processes [here](https://palisadoesfoundation.github.io/talawa-docs/docs/internships/gsoc/gsoc-introduction) ### GitHub Externship If you are participating in the GitHub Externship program, please read more about us and our processes [here](https://palisadoesfoundation.github.io/talawa-docs/docs/internships/github/github-introduction)🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
224-224: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
@palisadoes Now coderabbitai is approved |
|
@CyberWake @noman2002 Sir please my review it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/views/after_auth_screens/events/create_custom_recurring_event_test.dart (1)
420-422: Consider using a true mock or a dedicated factory method.
While naming the instancemockModelforCreateEventViewModelis acceptable, it's actually a real instance rather than a mock. If the test grows more complex or requires controlling the behavior of this model, consider using a mocking framework or a test factory pattern to produce specialized model instances.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pubspec.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/views/after_auth_screens/events/create_custom_recurring_event_test.dart(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
test/views/after_auth_screens/events/create_custom_recurring_event_test.dart (7)
416-417: Test name is sufficiently descriptive.
The name clearly indicates that the test will cover various interactions for selecting and deselecting weekdays.
424-426: Excellent use of a minimal widget test scaffold.
Wrapping theCustomWeekDaySelectorinMaterialAppandScaffoldensures that all Material-level dependencies and theming are available. This setup is clear and well-structured.
435-441: Verifications for Monday selection are clear and well validated.
The test neatly demonstrates the action of tapping "M" and confirms that the day is added to the model’sweekDays. This ensures correct integration between the widget and the model.
442-448: Wednesday selection logic is consistent.
You’ve replicated the pattern used for Monday, confirming the correct addition of Wednesday toweekDays. The coverage is thorough.
449-452: Good negative testing approach.
Verifying thatweekDaysdoes not include Sunday or Friday confirms that the widget does not inadvertently select un-tapped weekdays.
453-458: Deselect flow is properly tested.
Ensuring that a second tap removes Monday fromweekDaysvalidates that toggling a day off works as intended.
460-462: Final state checks are valid.
Confirming that only Wednesday remains selected after all interactions helps ensure that your toggling logic is robust. The test covers the complete select/deselect journey.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart (2)
468-502: Good test structure, consider adding edge cases.The test follows good practices with clear arrange-act-assert pattern and proper widget testing setup. However, consider enhancing it with:
- Verification that the text field becomes editable
- Error cases handling (e.g., when focus request fails)
testWidgets("Testing if firstName text field gets focus on onPressed", (tester) async { userConfig.updateUser( User(firstName: 'Test', lastName: 'Test', email: '[email protected]'), ); await tester.pumpWidget(createEditProfilePage(themeMode: ThemeMode.dark)); await tester.pumpAndSettle(); final firstNameTextField = find.byKey(const Key('FirstNameTextField')); final editIconButton = find.descendant( of: firstNameTextField, matching: find.byIcon(Icons.edit), ); expect(firstNameTextField, findsOneWidget); expect(editIconButton, findsOneWidget); await tester.tap(editIconButton); await tester.pumpAndSettle(); final focusedElement = FocusScope.of(tester.element(firstNameTextField)).focusedChild; expect(focusedElement, isNotNull); expect( focusedElement!.hasPrimaryFocus, isTrue, ); + // Verify text field is editable + final textField = tester.widget<TextFormField>(firstNameTextField); + expect(textField.enabled, isTrue); + + // Verify error handling + focusedElement!.unfocus(); + await tester.pumpAndSettle(); + expect(focusedElement.hasPrimaryFocus, isFalse); });
468-599: General improvements for test reliability and maintainability.While the new tests improve coverage, consider these enhancements:
- Add test documentation explaining the test scenarios and expected behavior
- Implement consistent error handling across all tests
- Add proper timing controls to prevent flaky tests
+/// Tests the focus behavior of the firstName text field when the edit icon is pressed. +/// +/// This test verifies that: +/// 1. The text field exists and is visible +/// 2. The edit icon is present +/// 3. Tapping the edit icon focuses the text field +/// 4. The text field becomes editable testWidgets("Testing if firstName text field gets focus on onPressed", (tester) async { // ... existing test code ... + // Add timeout to prevent flaky tests + await tester.pump(const Duration(milliseconds: 500)); }); +/// Tests the image selection and removal functionality. +/// +/// This test verifies that: +/// 1. The image selection modal appears when no image is present +/// 2. Image selection works for both camera and gallery +/// 3. Image removal works correctly +/// 4. UI updates reflect the image state testWidgets("Testing image selection and removal functionality", (tester) async { // ... existing test code ... + // Add timeout to prevent flaky tests + await tester.pump(const Duration(milliseconds: 500)); }); +/// Tests the focus behavior of the lastName text field when the edit icon is pressed. +/// +/// This test verifies that: +/// 1. The text field exists and is visible +/// 2. The edit icon is present +/// 3. Tapping the edit icon focuses the text field +/// 4. The text field becomes editable testWidgets("Focus shifts to lastNameTextField when edit icon is pressed", (tester) async { // ... existing test code ... + // Add timeout to prevent flaky tests + await tester.pump(const Duration(milliseconds: 500)); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart(1 hunks)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/profile/edit_profile_page_test.dart
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
noman2002
merged commit 1e0e627
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
PR: 100% Test Coverage for
EditProfilePageObjective
This PR achieves 100% code coverage for the
EditProfilePagefile by adding comprehensive unit tests for all methods, functions, and widgets.Summary
EditProfilePage.Issue : #2621
Summary by CodeRabbit