-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subcodes #218
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Open tasks in addition to my comments:
- upgrade top-api
- add tests
src/main/java/care/smith/top/backend/repository/ols/CodeRepository.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Please also update the enum test at assertThat(CodeScope.values())
.isEqualTo(
new CodeScope[] {
CodeScope.SELF,
CodeScope.SUBTREE,
CodeScope.LEAVES
}); |
Increased version to 0.8.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some open issues
-
Code system URIs are derived from
ontology.getConfig().getId()
, which doesn't seem right. If I connect to https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols4, SNOMEDCT has the ID "snomed".
Shouldontology.getConfig().getVersionIri()
be used, if available? -
Child nodes don't have a short name for their code system
While the public EBI OLS instance uses abbreviated labels as ontology ids, our import mechanism makes sure that ontologies being loaded into our TOP OLS instances always have their ontology IRI set as their OLS id. "id": "http://snomed.info/sct",
"versionIri": null,
I agree as it might be useful in the context of code versioning. Added in dfa6dab. |
@RalphBln, what is the status on:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there anything missing or is this PR ready to be merged?
No description provided.