TagDetector Cleanup and Update RoveComm_CPP Submodule

[ClayJay3]

Description

Add some sanity checks to TagDetector and temporarily comment out cv::Filter2D.

Changes Made

• Add checks for proper image formats and dimensions.
• Comment out cv::Filter2D, which was causing TagDetector blowout.
• Update RoveComm_CPP submodule commit.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 5207c60..20f319e. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Shell	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗
C & C++	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 26.20%. Comparing base (5207c60) to head (20f319e).
Report is 4 commits behind head on development.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/vision/aruco/TagDetector.cpp	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
src/vision/aruco/ArucoDetection.hpp	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
src/vision/aruco/TensorflowTagDetection.hpp	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development     #344      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        26.25%   26.20%   -0.05%     
===============================================
  Files               69       69              
  Lines             5310     5320      +10     
  Branches           456      458       +2     
===============================================
  Hits              1394     1394              
- Misses            3916     3926      +10     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/vision/aruco/TensorflowTagDetection.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/vision/aruco/ArucoDetection.hpp	44.23% <0.00%> (-2.71%)	⬇️
src/vision/aruco/TagDetector.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

[Byrdman32]

I'm fairly certain this looks good