Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

running with dan latest vtk-cdat #401

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 2, 2019
Merged

running with dan latest vtk-cdat #401

merged 7 commits into from
May 2, 2019

Conversation

doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@scottwittenburg
Copy link
Collaborator

This was just to test the updated build here.

@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ def computeMarkerScale(dataRange, screenGeom, pxScale=None):
# screenAspect = float(screenGeom[0]) / screenGeom[1]

scale = max(*diffwpoints)
if dataAspect > 1:
print("DA")
if dataAspect < 1:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@doutriaux1 @danlipsa This is the change that is causing the changes in marker size and the "black screen" (which just really huge markers) on this branch. This must have slipped in somehow from our experimentation while I was visiting.

As @doutriaux1 and I discussed a couple weeks ago, I'm going to revisit the handling of marker size again soon enough anyway, but I'll push a commit removing this and then create a vtk_master branch on the baseline repo and see if we can't get this though so we can really start taking @danlipsa latest VTK build.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good you found it. Not sure why I have not seen this. I was testing with master - maybe I did not pull the latest, or was this on a branch?

@scottwittenburg
Copy link
Collaborator

Baselines for this PR are located here.

@scottwittenburg
Copy link
Collaborator

Let's see how this does on circle @doutriaux1 and @danlipsa. With the new baselines for isofill and streamline, it passed all the tests for me.

@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@scottwittenburg this looks good. I'll need to take Dan's recipe then and build the python 3.7 binaries and switch back to using our channel/nightly then we can merge in master

@scottwittenburg
Copy link
Collaborator

Yep, sounds good. Thanks @doutriaux1.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 1, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at ?% when pulling 2016822 on vtk_master into 5b9f17f on master.

@doutriaux1 doutriaux1 merged commit 89123bb into master May 2, 2019
@doutriaux1 doutriaux1 deleted the vtk_master branch May 2, 2019 01:39
@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@danlipsa yes I had accidentally pushed it to vtk_master branch while experimenting with @scottwittenburg

@downiec downiec added this to the 8.2 milestone Oct 21, 2019
@downiec downiec modified the milestones: 8.2, 8.2.1 Jul 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants