Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

issue-1751: add ability to run several qemu with mounted filestore in test recipes; extract ssh client to lib from qemu recipe #2994

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

issue-1751: add ability to run several qemu with mounted filestore in test recipes; extract ssh client to lib from qemu recipe #2994

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025
+81 −61

Conversation

WilyTiger
Copy link
Collaborator

@WilyTiger WilyTiger commented Feb 7, 2025 •
edited by debnatkh
Loading

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Note

This is an automated comment that will be appended during run.

🔴 linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo: some tests FAILED for commit c29ed4f.

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
6316 6314 0 2 0 0

@WilyTiger WilyTiger force-pushed the users/wilytiger/issue-1751-test branch 2 times, most recently from 7bc8401 to 0499f3e Compare February 10, 2025 15:39
@WilyTiger
add ability to run several qemu with mounted filestore in test recipe…
3428625 
…s; extract ssh client to lib from qemu recipe
@WilyTiger WilyTiger force-pushed the users/wilytiger/issue-1751-test branch from 0499f3e to 3428625 Compare February 10, 2025 15:44
@WilyTiger WilyTiger changed the title [WIP] add ability to run several qemu with mounted filestore in test recipes; extract ssh client to lib from qemu recipe issue-1751: add ability to run several qemu with mounted filestore in test recipes; extract ssh client to lib from qemu recipe Feb 10, 2025
@WilyTiger WilyTiger marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2025 15:48
debnatkh
debnatkh previously approved these changes Feb 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
ya-ksgamora
ya-ksgamora previously approved these changes Feb 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
@WilyTiger WilyTiger added the recheck Add this label to relaunch checks, it will be automatically removed label Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the recheck Add this label to relaunch checks, it will be automatically removed label Feb 11, 2025
@WilyTiger WilyTiger added the rebase Add this label if you want to rebase your PR for test run label Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Note

This is an automated comment that will be appended during run.

🔴 linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo: some tests FAILED for commit 3428625.

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
6359 6352 0 7 0 0

@WilyTiger WilyTiger dismissed stale reviews from ya-ksgamora and debnatkh via b144cbc February 11, 2025 12:54
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Note

This is an automated comment that will be appended during run.

🔴 linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo: some tests FAILED for commit b144cbc.

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
6358 6354 0 4 0 0

@WilyTiger WilyTiger merged commit 120f62f into main Feb 11, 2025
10 of 14 checks passed
@WilyTiger WilyTiger deleted the users/wilytiger/issue-1751-test branch February 11, 2025 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@debnatkh debnatkh debnatkh approved these changes

@ya-ksgamora ya-ksgamora ya-ksgamora approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
rebase Add this label if you want to rebase your PR for test run
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@WilyTiger @debnatkh @ya-ksgamora