Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Increase minimum Python version to 3.10. #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues commented Oct 23, 2024

Description

Python 3.8 is EoL so we're bumping the minimum Python version to 3.10.

Validation performed

Lint workflow.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated Python version requirement to 3.10 in the README.
  • Chores

    • Upgraded Python version for linting checks from 3.8 to 3.10 in the workflow configuration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the Python version used in the code linting workflow and the project requirements. The Python version in the .github/workflows/code-linting-checks.yaml file has been changed from 3.8 to 3.10 for the linting job. Additionally, the README.md file has been modified to reflect this change, updating the Python version requirement from "Python 3.8 or higher" to "Python 3.10 or higher". No other modifications were made to the workflow or documentation structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/code-linting-checks.yaml Updated Python version from 3.8 to 3.10 in lint job.
README.md Updated Python requirement from "3.8 or higher" to "3.10 or higher".

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Linter
    participant README

    User->>Linter: Trigger linting job
    Linter->>Linter: Setup Python 3.10
    Linter->>User: Linting results
    User->>README: Check requirements
    README->>User: Python 3.10 or higher required
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

5-5: Consider enhancing the Python version requirement documentation.

While the version update is correct, consider adding:

  1. A note about Python 3.8's end-of-life status
  2. Migration guidance for users on Python 3.8-3.9
  3. Benefits of upgrading to Python 3.10 (e.g., improved type hinting, pattern matching)

Example addition:

-* Python 3.10 or higher
+* Python 3.10 or higher
+  * Note: Python 3.8 reached end-of-life in October 2024
+  * If you're using Python 3.8 or 3.9, please upgrade to maintain security and benefit from improved features
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f180f8 and 3f3f030.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/code-linting-checks.yaml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/code-linting-checks.yaml (1)

32-32: LGTM: Python version upgrade is appropriate.

The upgrade to Python 3.10 is well-justified as Python 3.8 has reached its end of life. This change will ensure the project maintains security updates and access to newer language features.

Let's verify the compatibility of the linting tools with Python 3.10:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to gather information about Python dependencies and tooling.

This should help us understand what Python tools and dependencies are being used, and verify their compatibility with Python 3.10.


Let's check the content of the lint requirements file we found to verify compatibility.


Python 3.10 upgrade is compatible with the project's tooling

The verification shows that:

  • The only Python dependency is yamllint (>=1.35.1)
  • yamllint 1.35.1 fully supports Python 3.10 (it supports Python 3.7 and newer)
  • No other Python-based tools or version constraints were found in the project

The upgrade to Python 3.10 in the GitHub Actions workflow is safe and won't cause any compatibility issues with the project's linting tools.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any Python version constraints in project configuration files

# Test: Look for Python version specifications in pyproject.toml, setup.py, or requirements files
echo "Checking Python version constraints in project files..."
rg -l "python_version|python_requires|Programming Language :: Python"

Length of output: 192


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for Python-related configuration files and requirements
echo "Looking for Python configuration files..."
fd -e py -e toml -e txt -e ini -e cfg --exec echo "Found: {}"

# Check content of workflow files for linting tools
echo -e "\nChecking workflow files for linting tools..."
rg -A 5 "pip install|poetry install|pre-commit" .github/workflows/

# Look for pre-commit config
echo -e "\nChecking for pre-commit configuration..."
fd "pre-commit" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 499


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of lint requirements
echo "Checking lint-requirements.txt content..."
cat lint-requirements.txt

# Look for any version constraints in the requirements
echo -e "\nChecking for version constraints..."
rg "==|>=|<=|~=|>|<" lint-requirements.txt

Length of output: 286

README.md (1)

5-5: Verify Python version consistency across the codebase.

Let's ensure the Python version requirement is consistently updated across all relevant files.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to gather information about Python version requirements.


Let me try one final search to ensure we haven't missed any Python version specifications.


Python version requirement appears to be isolated to README.md

Based on our thorough search across the codebase, we found:

  • The Python 3.10+ requirement is only mentioned in README.md
  • No configuration files (pyproject.toml, setup.py, setup.cfg, tox.ini) were found
  • No GitHub workflow files were found specifying Python versions
  • No other Python-related files were detected in the repository

Since there are no other files specifying Python version requirements to compare against, the version specification in README.md cannot be inconsistent with other files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Python version references across the codebase
# Expected results: All files should reference Python 3.10 or higher

echo "Checking Python version references in documentation and configuration files..."
rg -i "python.*3\.[0-9]+" --type yaml --type md --type toml --type ini

echo "Checking setup files for Python version specifications..."
fd -e pyproject.toml -e setup.py -e setup.cfg --exec cat {}

Length of output: 456


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Python version references with more flexible patterns
echo "Checking Python version patterns in all files..."
rg -i "python.*(3\.[0-9]+|>=|>=3|requires|version)" --type yaml --type md

echo "Checking for pyproject.toml with explicit path..."
if [ -f "pyproject.toml" ]; then
    cat pyproject.toml
fi

echo "Checking GitHub workflow files..."
fd -e yml -e yaml -p '.github/workflows' --exec cat {}

echo "Checking tox configuration..."
if [ -f "tox.ini" ]; then
    cat tox.ini
fi

Length of output: 577


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any Python-related configuration files
echo "Looking for Python-related files..."
fd -e py -e cfg -e toml -e ini --exec file {}

# Search for any version specifiers in Python files
echo "Checking Python files for version hints..."
rg -i "(python_version|python_requires|>=\s*3|python\s+3)" --type py

Length of output: 445

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues merged commit 763a3ca into y-scope:main Oct 23, 2024
5 checks passed
@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues deleted the bump-min-python branch October 23, 2024 12:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant