enhance: subscription design followups #1471
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis update enhances the WP User Frontend plugin by refining tooltip and header styles, restructuring the admin menu for subscriptions, and localizing JavaScript messages. These changes improve both the aesthetic and usability of the admin interface, streamline code organization, and enhance user interactions when managing subscriptions. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (40 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- wpuf-functions.php (1 hunks)
- wpuf.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot
- wpuf-functions.php
- wpuf.php
Additional comments not posted (3)
package.json (3)
10-11: Verify integration of Vite scripts.The addition of
"dev": "vite"and"build": "vite build"scripts indicates a transition to using Vite for development and build processes. Ensure that the project structure and configuration files are updated accordingly to support Vite.Verification successful
Vite integration is properly configured.
The
vite.config.mjsfile is well-defined, supporting Vue and specifying input and output configurations. This confirms that Vite is correctly set up for development and build processes in the project.
vite.config.mjsincludes Vue plugin and specific build configurations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Vite configuration and integration. # Test: Search for Vite configuration files. Expect: Presence of vite.config.js or equivalent. fd -e js -e ts -e mjs --exec rg 'vite' --files-with-matchesLength of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the contents of the Vite configuration file to verify its setup. # Test: Output the contents of vite.config.mjs to review its configuration. cat vite.config.mjsLength of output: 1092
14-15: Ensure new devDependencies are utilized.The addition of
@tailwindcss/forms,@vitejs/plugin-vue, anddaisyuireflects a shift towards modern CSS frameworks and build tools. Verify that these packages are effectively integrated into the project's styling and development processes.Also applies to: 16-16
40-49: Verify integration of new Vue.js dependencies.The addition of Vue.js-related libraries such as
@heroicons/vue,@vueform/multiselect, andvue-routerenhances the UI capabilities. Ensure these libraries are properly integrated and utilized in the project.Verification successful
New Vue.js dependencies are integrated into the project.
The dependencies
@heroicons/vue,@vueform/multiselect, andvue-routerare being used in the project:
@vueform/multiselectis used inassets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue.@heroicons/vueis used inassets/js/components/subscriptions/QuickEdit.vue.vue-routeris referenced inassets/vendor/vue-router/vue-router.js.These integrations suggest that the new libraries are being utilized effectively in the project's UI components.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of new Vue.js dependencies. # Test: Search for usage of new Vue.js dependencies in the project files. rg '@heroicons/vue|@vueform/multiselect|vue-router' --type js --type vueLength of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of new Vue.js dependencies. # Find all .vue files and search for usage of new Vue.js dependencies. fd -e vue -e js | xargs rg '@heroicons/vue|@vueform/multiselect|vue-router'Length of output: 673
…iption_design_followups
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (7)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/Subscriptions.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/List.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Pagination.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Subsection.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/stores/subscription.js (1 hunks)
- includes/Free/Free_Loader.php (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css
- assets/js/components/Subscriptions.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/List.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Pagination.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Subsection.vue
- includes/Free/Free_Loader.php
Additional context used
Biome
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
[error] 32-32: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 36-36: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 52-52: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 90-90: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 91-91: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 177-177: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 186-186: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 193-193: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 205-205: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 211-211: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 253-253: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 258-258: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
Additional comments not posted (2)
assets/js/stores/subscription.js (2)
1-5: Imports look good.The import statements are appropriate and necessary for the functionality implemented in this file.
7-25: State properties are well-defined.The state properties comprehensively cover the necessary aspects of subscription management.
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
Outdated
| return fetch( requestUrl, requestOptions ) | ||
| .then( ( response ) => response.json() ) | ||
| .catch( ( error ) => { | ||
| console.log( error ); | ||
| } ).finally( () => { | ||
| this.isUpdating = false; | ||
| } ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling in fetch calls.
Currently, errors are logged to the console. Consider implementing a user-friendly error notification system.
- .catch( ( error ) => {
- console.log( error );
+ .catch( ( error ) => {
+ this.setError('fetch', 'An error occurred while updating the subscription.');Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
Outdated
| getters: { | ||
| fieldNames: () => { | ||
| const sections = wpufSubscriptions.fields; | ||
| const names = []; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const section in sections) { | ||
| if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| for (const subsection in sections[section]) { | ||
| if (!sections[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| for (const field in sections[section][subsection]) { | ||
| names.push( field ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return names; | ||
| }, | ||
| fields: () => { | ||
| const sections = wpufSubscriptions.fields; | ||
| const fields = []; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const section in sections) { | ||
| if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| for (const subsection in sections[section]) { | ||
| if (!sections[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| for (const field in sections[section][subsection]) { | ||
| fields.push( sections[section][subsection][field] ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return fields; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Object.hasOwn() instead of hasOwnProperty.
It's recommended to use Object.hasOwn() for checking property ownership to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit from Object.prototype.
- if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) {
+ if (!Object.hasOwn(sections, section)) {
- if (!sections[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) {
+ if (!Object.hasOwn(sections[section], subsection)) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| getters: { | |
| fieldNames: () => { | |
| const sections = wpufSubscriptions.fields; | |
| const names = []; | |
| for (const section in sections) { | |
| if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const subsection in sections[section]) { | |
| if (!sections[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const field in sections[section][subsection]) { | |
| names.push( field ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return names; | |
| }, | |
| fields: () => { | |
| const sections = wpufSubscriptions.fields; | |
| const fields = []; | |
| for (const section in sections) { | |
| if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const subsection in sections[section]) { | |
| if (!sections[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const field in sections[section][subsection]) { | |
| fields.push( sections[section][subsection][field] ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return fields; | |
| }, | |
| getters: { | |
| fieldNames: () => { | |
| const sections = wpufSubscriptions.fields; | |
| const names = []; | |
| for (const section in sections) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(sections, section)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const subsection in sections[section]) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(sections[section], subsection)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const field in sections[section][subsection]) { | |
| names.push( field ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return names; | |
| }, | |
| fields: () => { | |
| const sections = wpufSubscriptions.fields; | |
| const fields = []; | |
| for (const section in sections) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(sections, section)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const subsection in sections[section]) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(sections[section], subsection)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const field in sections[section][subsection]) { | |
| fields.push( sections[section][subsection][field] ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return fields; | |
| }, |
Tools
Biome
[error] 32-32: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 36-36: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 52-52: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // error if plan name contains #. PayPal doesn't allow # in package name | ||
| if ( fieldData.id === 'plan-name' && value.includes( '#' )) { | ||
| this.setError( field, __( '# is not supported in plan name', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (fieldData.is_required && value === '') { | ||
| this.setError( field, __( fieldData.label + ' is required', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| validateFields( mode = 'update' ) { | ||
| this.resetErrors(); | ||
|
|
||
| switch (mode) { | ||
| case 'quickEdit': | ||
| this.validateQuickEdit(); | ||
| break; | ||
| default: | ||
| this.validateEdit(); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return !this.hasError(); | ||
| }, | ||
| deleteSubscription( id ) { | ||
| const requestOptions = { | ||
| method: 'DELETE', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | ||
| }, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| return fetch( '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription/' + id, requestOptions ) | ||
| .then( ( response ) => response.json() ) | ||
| .catch( ( error ) => { | ||
| console.log( error ); | ||
| } ); | ||
| }, | ||
| changeSubscriptionStatus( subscription ) { | ||
| subscription.edit_single_row = true; | ||
|
|
||
| this.setCurrentSubscription( subscription ); | ||
|
|
||
| return this.updateSubscription(); | ||
| }, | ||
| async setSubscriptionsByStatus( status, offset = 0 ) { | ||
| this.isSubscriptionLoading = true; | ||
|
|
||
| const queryParams = {'per_page': wpufSubscriptions.perPage, 'offset': offset, 'post_status': status}; | ||
| return apiFetch( { | ||
| path: addQueryArgs( '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription', queryParams ), | ||
| method: 'GET', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | ||
| }, | ||
| } ) | ||
| .then( ( response ) => { | ||
| if (response.success) { | ||
| this.currentSubscriptionStatus = status; | ||
| this.subscriptionList = response.subscriptions; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| } ) | ||
| .catch( ( error ) => { | ||
| console.log( error ); | ||
| } ) | ||
| .finally( () => { | ||
| this.isSubscriptionLoading = false; | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| async getSubscriptionCount( status = 'all' ) { | ||
| let path = '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription/count'; | ||
|
|
||
| if (status !== 'all') { | ||
| path += '/' + status; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return apiFetch( { | ||
| path: addQueryArgs( path ), | ||
| method: 'GET', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | ||
| }, | ||
| } ) | ||
| .then( ( response ) => { | ||
| if (response.success) { | ||
| this.allCount = response.count; | ||
| } | ||
| } ) | ||
| .catch( ( error ) => { | ||
| console.log( error ); | ||
| } ); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Object.hasOwn() instead of hasOwnProperty.
Replace hasOwnProperty with Object.hasOwn() for better reliability.
- if (this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( field.db_key )) {
+ if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, field.db_key)) {
- if (this.currentSubscription.hasOwnProperty( key )) {
+ if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription, key)) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| actions: { | |
| setCurrentSubscription( subscription ) { | |
| this.currentSubscription = subscription; | |
| }, | |
| setCurrentSubscriptionCopy() { | |
| this.currentSubscriptionCopy = this.subscription; | |
| }, | |
| setBlankSubscription() { | |
| this.currentSubscription = {}; | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value = {}; | |
| for (const field of this.fields) { | |
| switch (field.db_type) { | |
| case 'post': | |
| this.currentSubscription[field.db_key] = field.default; | |
| break; | |
| case 'meta': | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key] = field.default; | |
| break; | |
| case 'meta_serialized': | |
| let serializedValue = {}; | |
| if (this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( field.db_key )) { | |
| serializedValue = this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key]; | |
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | |
| } else { | |
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | |
| } | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key] = serializedValue; | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| getValueFromField( field ) { | |
| switch (field.type) { | |
| case 'input-text': | |
| case 'input-number': | |
| case 'textarea': | |
| case 'switcher': | |
| case 'select': | |
| return document.querySelector( '#' + field.id ).value; | |
| case 'time-date': | |
| return document.querySelector( '#dp-input-' + field.id ).value; | |
| default: | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| async updateSubscription() { | |
| if (this.currentSubscription === null) { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| this.isUpdating = true; | |
| let allTaxonomies = []; | |
| for (const [key, taxonomy] of Object.entries( this.taxonomyRestriction )) { | |
| allTaxonomies = allTaxonomies.concat( taxonomy ); | |
| } | |
| const taxonomyIntValue = allTaxonomies.map( ( item ) => parseInt( item ) ); | |
| const uniqueTaxonomies = [...new Set( taxonomyIntValue )]; | |
| // custom meta key for taxonomy restriction | |
| this.setMetaValue( '_sub_allowed_term_ids', uniqueTaxonomies ); | |
| const subscription = this.currentSubscription; | |
| let requestUrl = '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription'; | |
| if (subscription.ID) { | |
| requestUrl += '/' + subscription.ID; | |
| } | |
| const requestOptions = { | |
| method: 'POST', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | |
| }, | |
| body: JSON.stringify( {subscription} ) | |
| }; | |
| this.isDirty = false; | |
| return fetch( requestUrl, requestOptions ) | |
| .then( ( response ) => response.json() ) | |
| .catch( ( error ) => { | |
| console.log( error ); | |
| } ).finally( () => { | |
| this.isUpdating = false; | |
| } ); | |
| }, | |
| modifyCurrentSubscription( key, value, serializeKey = null ) { | |
| if (this.currentSubscription === null) { | |
| this.setBlankSubscription(); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| this.isDirty = true; | |
| if (serializeKey === null) { | |
| // if key is not found in currentSubscription, then it must be in meta_value | |
| if (this.currentSubscription.hasOwnProperty( key )) { | |
| this.currentSubscription[key] = value; | |
| } else { | |
| this.setMetaValue( key, value ); | |
| } | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( key )) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[key][serializeKey] = value; | |
| }, | |
| getMetaValue( key ) { | |
| if (!this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( key )) { | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| return this.currentSubscription.meta_value[key]; | |
| }, | |
| setMetaValue( key, value ) { | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[key] = value; | |
| this.isDirty = true; | |
| }, | |
| getSerializedMetaValue( key, serializeKey ) { | |
| if (!this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( key )) { | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| const serializedValue = this.getMetaValue( key ); | |
| if (!serializedValue.hasOwnProperty( serializeKey )) { | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| return serializedValue[serializeKey]; | |
| }, | |
| setError( field, message ) { | |
| this.errors[field] = { | |
| status: true, | |
| message: message, | |
| }; | |
| }, | |
| resetErrors() { | |
| this.errors = {}; | |
| }, | |
| hasError() { | |
| for (const item in this.errors) { | |
| if (this.errors[item]) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }, | |
| validateQuickEdit() { | |
| const planName = this.currentSubscription.post_title; | |
| if (planName === '') { | |
| this.setError( 'planName', __( 'This field is required', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | |
| } | |
| // error if plan name contains #. PayPal doesn't allow # in package name | |
| if (planName.includes( '#' )) { | |
| this.setError( 'planName', __( '# is not supported in plan name', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| validateEdit() { | |
| const subscription = this.currentSubscription; | |
| const fields = wpufSubscriptions.fields; | |
| for (const section in fields) { | |
| if (!fields.hasOwnProperty( section )) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const subsection in fields[section]) { | |
| if (!fields[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const field in fields[section][subsection]) { | |
| const fieldData = fields[section][subsection][field]; | |
| let value = ''; | |
| switch (fieldData.db_type) { | |
| case 'meta': | |
| value = subscription.meta_value[fieldData.db_key]; | |
| break; | |
| case 'meta_serialized': | |
| value = subscription.meta_value[fieldData.db_key]; | |
| break; | |
| case 'post': | |
| value = subscription[fieldData.db_key]; | |
| break; | |
| default: | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| // error if plan name contains #. PayPal doesn't allow # in package name | |
| if ( fieldData.id === 'plan-name' && value.includes( '#' )) { | |
| this.setError( field, __( '# is not supported in plan name', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | |
| } | |
| if (fieldData.is_required && value === '') { | |
| this.setError( field, __( fieldData.label + ' is required', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| validateFields( mode = 'update' ) { | |
| this.resetErrors(); | |
| switch (mode) { | |
| case 'quickEdit': | |
| this.validateQuickEdit(); | |
| break; | |
| default: | |
| this.validateEdit(); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| return !this.hasError(); | |
| }, | |
| deleteSubscription( id ) { | |
| const requestOptions = { | |
| method: 'DELETE', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | |
| }, | |
| }; | |
| return fetch( '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription/' + id, requestOptions ) | |
| .then( ( response ) => response.json() ) | |
| .catch( ( error ) => { | |
| console.log( error ); | |
| } ); | |
| }, | |
| changeSubscriptionStatus( subscription ) { | |
| subscription.edit_single_row = true; | |
| this.setCurrentSubscription( subscription ); | |
| return this.updateSubscription(); | |
| }, | |
| async setSubscriptionsByStatus( status, offset = 0 ) { | |
| this.isSubscriptionLoading = true; | |
| const queryParams = {'per_page': wpufSubscriptions.perPage, 'offset': offset, 'post_status': status}; | |
| return apiFetch( { | |
| path: addQueryArgs( '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription', queryParams ), | |
| method: 'GET', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | |
| }, | |
| } ) | |
| .then( ( response ) => { | |
| if (response.success) { | |
| this.currentSubscriptionStatus = status; | |
| this.subscriptionList = response.subscriptions; | |
| } | |
| return response; | |
| } ) | |
| .catch( ( error ) => { | |
| console.log( error ); | |
| } ) | |
| .finally( () => { | |
| this.isSubscriptionLoading = false; | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| async getSubscriptionCount( status = 'all' ) { | |
| let path = '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription/count'; | |
| if (status !== 'all') { | |
| path += '/' + status; | |
| } | |
| return apiFetch( { | |
| path: addQueryArgs( path ), | |
| method: 'GET', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | |
| }, | |
| } ) | |
| .then( ( response ) => { | |
| if (response.success) { | |
| this.allCount = response.count; | |
| } | |
| } ) | |
| .catch( ( error ) => { | |
| console.log( error ); | |
| } ); | |
| }, | |
| actions: { | |
| setCurrentSubscription( subscription ) { | |
| this.currentSubscription = subscription; | |
| }, | |
| setCurrentSubscriptionCopy() { | |
| this.currentSubscriptionCopy = this.subscription; | |
| }, | |
| setBlankSubscription() { | |
| this.currentSubscription = {}; | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value = {}; | |
| for (const field of this.fields) { | |
| switch (field.db_type) { | |
| case 'post': | |
| this.currentSubscription[field.db_key] = field.default; | |
| break; | |
| case 'meta': | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key] = field.default; | |
| break; | |
| case 'meta_serialized': | |
| let serializedValue = {}; | |
| if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, field.db_key)) { | |
| serializedValue = this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key]; | |
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | |
| } else { | |
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | |
| } | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key] = serializedValue; | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| getValueFromField( field ) { | |
| switch (field.type) { | |
| case 'input-text': | |
| case 'input-number': | |
| case 'textarea': | |
| case 'switcher': | |
| case 'select': | |
| return document.querySelector( '#' + field.id ).value; | |
| case 'time-date': | |
| return document.querySelector( '#dp-input-' + field.id ).value; | |
| default: | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| async updateSubscription() { | |
| if (this.currentSubscription === null) { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| this.isUpdating = true; | |
| let allTaxonomies = []; | |
| for (const [key, taxonomy] of Object.entries( this.taxonomyRestriction )) { | |
| allTaxonomies = allTaxonomies.concat( taxonomy ); | |
| } | |
| const taxonomyIntValue = allTaxonomies.map( ( item ) => parseInt( item ) ); | |
| const uniqueTaxonomies = [...new Set( taxonomyIntValue )]; | |
| // custom meta key for taxonomy restriction | |
| this.setMetaValue( '_sub_allowed_term_ids', uniqueTaxonomies ); | |
| const subscription = this.currentSubscription; | |
| let requestUrl = '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription'; | |
| if (subscription.ID) { | |
| requestUrl += '/' + subscription.ID; | |
| } | |
| const requestOptions = { | |
| method: 'POST', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | |
| }, | |
| body: JSON.stringify( {subscription} ) | |
| }; | |
| this.isDirty = false; | |
| return fetch( requestUrl, requestOptions ) | |
| .then( ( response ) => response.json() ) | |
| .catch( ( error ) => { | |
| console.log( error ); | |
| } ).finally( () => { | |
| this.isUpdating = false; | |
| } ); | |
| }, | |
| modifyCurrentSubscription( key, value, serializeKey = null ) { | |
| if (this.currentSubscription === null) { | |
| this.setBlankSubscription(); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| this.isDirty = true; | |
| if (serializeKey === null) { | |
| // if key is not found in currentSubscription, then it must be in meta_value | |
| if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription, key)) { | |
| this.currentSubscription[key] = value; | |
| } else { | |
| this.setMetaValue( key, value ); | |
| } | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, key)) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[key][serializeKey] = value; | |
| }, | |
| getMetaValue( key ) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, key)) { | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| return this.currentSubscription.meta_value[key]; | |
| }, | |
| setMetaValue( key, value ) { | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[key] = value; | |
| this.isDirty = true; | |
| }, | |
| getSerializedMetaValue( key, serializeKey ) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, key)) { | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| const serializedValue = this.getMetaValue( key ); | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(serializedValue, serializeKey)) { | |
| return ''; | |
| } | |
| return serializedValue[serializeKey]; | |
| }, | |
| setError( field, message ) { | |
| this.errors[field] = { | |
| status: true, | |
| message: message, | |
| }; | |
| }, | |
| resetErrors() { | |
| this.errors = {}; | |
| }, | |
| hasError() { | |
| for (const item in this.errors) { | |
| if (this.errors[item]) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }, | |
| validateQuickEdit() { | |
| const planName = this.currentSubscription.post_title; | |
| if (planName === '') { | |
| this.setError( 'planName', __( 'This field is required', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | |
| } | |
| // error if plan name contains #. PayPal doesn't allow # in package name | |
| if (planName.includes( '#' )) { | |
| this.setError( 'planName', __( '# is not supported in plan name', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| validateEdit() { | |
| const subscription = this.currentSubscription; | |
| const fields = wpufSubscriptions.fields; | |
| for (const section in fields) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(fields, section)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const subsection in fields[section]) { | |
| if (!Object.hasOwn(fields[section], subsection)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| for (const field in fields[section][subsection]) { | |
| const fieldData = fields[section][subsection][field]; | |
| let value = ''; | |
| switch (fieldData.db_type) { | |
| case 'meta': | |
| value = subscription.meta_value[fieldData.db_key]; | |
| break; | |
| case 'meta_serialized': | |
| value = subscription.meta_value[fieldData.db_key]; | |
| break; | |
| case 'post': | |
| value = subscription[fieldData.db_key]; | |
| break; | |
| default: | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| // error if plan name contains #. PayPal doesn't allow # in package name | |
| if ( fieldData.id === 'plan-name' && value.includes( '#' )) { | |
| this.setError( field, __( '# is not supported in plan name', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | |
| } | |
| if (fieldData.is_required && value === '') { | |
| this.setError( field, __( fieldData.label + ' is required', 'wp-user-frontend' ) ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| validateFields( mode = 'update' ) { | |
| this.resetErrors(); | |
| switch (mode) { | |
| case 'quickEdit': | |
| this.validateQuickEdit(); | |
| break; | |
| default: | |
| this.validateEdit(); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| return !this.hasError(); | |
| }, | |
| deleteSubscription( id ) { | |
| const requestOptions = { | |
| method: 'DELETE', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | |
| }, | |
| }; | |
| return fetch( '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription/' + id, requestOptions ) | |
| .then( ( response ) => response.json() ) | |
| .catch( ( error ) => { | |
| console.log( error ); | |
| } ); | |
| }, | |
| changeSubscriptionStatus( subscription ) { | |
| subscription.edit_single_row = true; | |
| this.setCurrentSubscription( subscription ); | |
| return this.updateSubscription(); | |
| }, | |
| async setSubscriptionsByStatus( status, offset = 0 ) { | |
| this.isSubscriptionLoading = true; | |
| const queryParams = {'per_page': wpufSubscriptions.perPage, 'offset': offset, 'post_status': status}; | |
| return apiFetch( { | |
| path: addQueryArgs( '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription', queryParams ), | |
| method: 'GET', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | |
| }, | |
| } ) | |
| .then( ( response ) => { | |
| if (response.success) { | |
| this.currentSubscriptionStatus = status; | |
| this.subscriptionList = response.subscriptions; | |
| } | |
| return response; | |
| } ) | |
| .catch( ( error ) => { | |
| console.log( error ); | |
| } ) | |
| .finally( () => { | |
| this.isSubscriptionLoading = false; | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| async getSubscriptionCount( status = 'all' ) { | |
| let path = '/wp-json/wpuf/v1/wpuf_subscription/count'; | |
| if (status !== 'all') { | |
| path += '/' + status; | |
| } | |
| return apiFetch( { | |
| path: addQueryArgs( path ), | |
| method: 'GET', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'X-WP-Nonce': wpufSubscriptions.nonce, | |
| }, | |
| } ) | |
| .then( ( response ) => { | |
| if (response.success) { | |
| this.allCount = response.count; | |
| } | |
| } ) | |
| .catch( ( error ) => { | |
| console.log( error ); | |
| } ); | |
| }, |
Tools
Biome
[error] 90-90: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 91-91: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 177-177: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 186-186: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 193-193: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 205-205: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 211-211: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 253-253: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 258-258: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (11)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/Header.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/InfoCard.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/New.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Popup.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/QuickEdit.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInnerField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/stores/subscription.js (1 hunks)
- includes/Frontend.php (1 hunks)
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (42 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Popup.vue
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css
- assets/js/components/Header.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/InfoCard.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/New.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/QuickEdit.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInnerField.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot
Additional context used
Biome
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
[error] 32-32: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 36-36: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 52-52: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 90-90: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 91-91: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 177-177: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 186-186: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 193-193: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 205-205: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 211-211: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 253-253: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 258-258: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
Additional comments not posted (1)
includes/Frontend.php (1)
151-157: Ensure correct localization of subscription messages.The addition of
wp_localize_scriptforwpuf_subscriptionis a good enhancement for providing localized messages to users. Ensure that thewpuf_subscription_js_datafilter is correctly implemented and that the localized strings are translated in all supported languages.
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
Outdated
| const names = []; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const section in sections) { | ||
| if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Object.hasOwn() instead of hasOwnProperty.
Replace hasOwnProperty with Object.hasOwn() for better reliability and to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit from Object.prototype.
- if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) {
+ if (!Object.hasOwn(sections, section)) {- if (!sections[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) {
+ if (!Object.hasOwn(sections[section], subsection)) {Also applies to: 36-36, 52-52, 56-56
Tools
Biome
[error] 32-32: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| case 'meta_serialized': | ||
| let serializedValue = {}; | ||
| if (this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( field.db_key )) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Object.hasOwn() instead of hasOwnProperty.
Replace hasOwnProperty with Object.hasOwn() for better reliability and to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit from Object.prototype.
- if (this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( field.db_key )) {
+ if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, field.db_key)) {- if (this.currentSubscription.hasOwnProperty( key )) {
+ if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription, key)) {Also applies to: 177-177, 186-186, 193-193, 205-205, 211-211
Tools
Biome
[error] 91-91: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (7)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/Header.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/Subscriptions.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/ContentHeader.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/ListHeader.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SidebarMenu.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Subsection.vue (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css
- assets/js/components/Header.vue
- assets/js/components/Subscriptions.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/ListHeader.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SidebarMenu.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Subsection.vue
Additional comments not posted (3)
assets/js/components/subscriptions/ContentHeader.vue (3)
24-27: Verify SVG accessibility.Ensure that the SVG icon is accessible, possibly by adding
aria-hidden="true"if it is purely decorative or providing a descriptivearia-label.
15-30: Verify translation strings.Ensure that the translation strings
'Subscriptions'and'Add Subscription'are correctly registered in the WordPress localization files to avoid missing translations.
10-12: Verify logic forshouldShowButton.Ensure that the logic correctly handles all possible values of
subscriptionStore.currentSubscriptionStatusandsubscriptionStore.allCount.all. Consider edge cases where these values might lead to unexpected behavior.Verification successful
Logic for
shouldShowButtonis correct.The logic in the
shouldShowButtoncomputed property correctly handles the conditions for displaying the button based onsubscriptionStore.currentSubscriptionStatusandsubscriptionStore.allCount.all. No edge cases appear to be missed.
currentSubscriptionStatusis initialized as'all'.allCountis an object, and its usage aligns with the logic inshouldShowButton.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic for `shouldShowButton` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the `currentSubscriptionStatus` and `allCount` usage. Expect: Consistent logic with no edge cases missed. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'currentSubscriptionStatus|allCount'Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic for `shouldShowButton` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the `currentSubscriptionStatus` and `allCount` usage across JavaScript files. Expect: Consistent logic with no edge cases missed. rg --type js -A 5 'currentSubscriptionStatus|allCount'Length of output: 16722
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
assets/js/stores/subscription.js (5)
235-246: Validate plan name more comprehensively.Ensure that the validation for
planNamecovers all necessary cases and provides clear error messages to users.
69-103: CorrectsetCurrentSubscriptionCopyto usethis.currentSubscriptionThe method
setCurrentSubscriptionCopycurrently assignsthis.subscriptiontothis.currentSubscriptionCopy. It seems more appropriate for it to copythis.currentSubscription, which is actively used and manipulated in the code.
- File:
assets/js/stores/subscription.js- Line:
setCurrentSubscriptionCopy()Please update the assignment to ensure it reflects the intended behavior.
Analysis chain
Ensure
setCurrentSubscriptionCopyassigns correctly.In
setCurrentSubscriptionCopy, it seems likethis.currentSubscriptionCopyis intended to be a copy ofthis.currentSubscription. Ensure that this is the intended behavior, as currently it assignsthis.subscription, which may not exist or be correct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct assignment in `setCurrentSubscriptionCopy`. # Test: Search for `setCurrentSubscriptionCopy` usage. Expect: Correct assignment logic. rg --type js $'setCurrentSubscriptionCopy'Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of `this.subscription` in the codebase rg --type js 'this\.subscription' # Search for the definition and usage of `this.currentSubscription` in the codebase rg --type js 'this\.currentSubscription'Length of output: 2617
Tools
Biome
[error] 90-90: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 91-91: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
379-399: EnsurewpufSubscriptions.currencySymbolis defined to prevent display issues.The search did not reveal a direct definition or initialization for
wpufSubscriptions.currencySymbol, indicating a potential risk of it being undefined. Please ensure thatcurrencySymbolis properly initialized before use to avoid any issues with displaying billing amounts.
- Consider checking the initialization process of
wpufSubscriptionsto ensurecurrencySymbolis set correctly.Analysis chain
Ensure currency symbol is defined in
getReadableBillingAmount.Ensure that
wpufSubscriptions.currencySymbolis always defined to avoid issues with displaying billing amounts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `wpufSubscriptions.currencySymbol` is defined. # Test: Search for `wpufSubscriptions.currencySymbol` usage. Expect: Correct definition and usage. rg --type js $'wpufSubscriptions.currencySymbol'Length of output: 1396
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of `wpufSubscriptions.currencySymbol`. # Test: Search for the definition of `wpufSubscriptions.currencySymbol`. Expect: Find where it is initialized or assigned. rg --type js 'wpufSubscriptions.currencySymbol\s*='Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition or initialization of `wpufSubscriptions`. # Test: Search for the definition or initialization of `wpufSubscriptions`. Expect: Find where it is defined or assigned. rg --type js 'wpufSubscriptions\s*='Length of output: 424
199-203: EnsuresetMetaValuemaintains reactivity by using Vue'ssetmethod.The
currentSubscription.meta_valueis not guaranteed to be reactive when new properties are added. Consider using Vue'ssetmethod or initializingmeta_valueas a reactive object to ensure changes trigger updates.
- File:
assets/js/stores/subscription.js- Line: 199
Analysis chain
Ensure
setMetaValuemaintains reactivity.When setting
meta_value, ensure that Vue's reactivity system is maintained. Directly assigning to objects may not trigger updates.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify reactivity in `setMetaValue`. # Test: Search for `setMetaValue` usage. Expect: Correct reactivity handling. rg --type js $'setMetaValue'Length of output: 719
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the declaration of `currentSubscription` to check if it's reactive. rg --type js 'currentSubscription' # Search for the use of Vue's `set` method in the file to see if it is used for reactivity. rg --type js 'Vue.set'Length of output: 10277
322-328: Add Error Handling inchangeSubscriptionStatusThe
processPromiseResultfunction does not handle errors fromchangeSubscriptionStatus. Ensure that errors are caught and handled appropriately to prevent unhandled promise rejections.
- Consider adding a
.catch()block to handle errors inprocessPromiseResultor directly wherechangeSubscriptionStatusis invoked.Analysis chain
Ensure
changeSubscriptionStatushandles errors.When changing subscription status, ensure that any errors during
updateSubscriptionare handled appropriately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in `changeSubscriptionStatus`. # Test: Search for `changeSubscriptionStatus` usage. Expect: Correct error handling. rg --type js $'changeSubscriptionStatus'Length of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of `promiseResult` in `SubscriptionBox.vue` to verify error handling. rg 'promiseResult' -A 5 assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vueLength of output: 1451
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of `processPromiseResult` in `SubscriptionBox.vue` to verify error handling. rg 'function processPromiseResult' -A 10 assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vueLength of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of `processPromiseResult` in `SubscriptionBox.vue` to verify error handling. rg 'processPromiseResult' assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vue -A 10Length of output: 1362
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (7)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Edit.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/InfoCard.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/stores/subscription.js (1 hunks)
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (42 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Edit.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/InfoCard.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vue
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot
Additional context used
Biome
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
[error] 32-32: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 36-36: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 52-52: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 90-90: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 91-91: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 177-177: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 186-186: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 193-193: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 205-205: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 211-211: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 253-253: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 258-258: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
Additional comments not posted (13)
assets/js/stores/subscription.js (13)
1-5: Imports are well-organized and relevant.The imports from Pinia, Vue, and WordPress packages are appropriate for the functionality provided in this file.
7-25: State definitions are clear and appropriate.The state properties are well-defined and use Vue's
refandreactiveto manage reactivity. This setup is suitable for handling subscription data.
26-66: UseObject.hasOwn()instead ofhasOwnProperty.Replace
hasOwnPropertywithObject.hasOwn()for better reliability and to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit fromObject.prototype.Tools
Biome
[error] 32-32: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 36-36: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 52-52: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
120-165: Improve error handling inupdateSubscription.Currently, errors are logged to the console. Consider implementing a user-friendly error notification system to inform users about issues.
166-191: UseObject.hasOwn()instead ofhasOwnProperty.Replace
hasOwnPropertywithObject.hasOwn()for better reliability and to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit fromObject.prototype.Tools
Biome
[error] 177-177: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 186-186: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
192-198: UseObject.hasOwn()instead ofhasOwnProperty.Replace
hasOwnPropertywithObject.hasOwn()for better reliability and to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit fromObject.prototype.Tools
Biome
[error] 193-193: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
204-216: UseObject.hasOwn()instead ofhasOwnProperty.Replace
hasOwnPropertywithObject.hasOwn()for better reliability and to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit fromObject.prototype.Tools
Biome
[error] 205-205: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 211-211: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
217-234: Error handling methods are well-structured.The methods for setting, resetting, and checking errors are well-structured and provide a clear way to manage error states.
247-292: UseObject.hasOwn()instead ofhasOwnProperty.Replace
hasOwnPropertywithObject.hasOwn()for better reliability and to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit fromObject.prototype.Tools
Biome
[error] 253-253: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 258-258: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
293-306: Validation logic is clear but ensure completeness.The validation logic is clear, but ensure that all fields are validated according to business requirements.
307-321: Improve error handling indeleteSubscription.Currently, errors are logged to the console. Consider implementing a user-friendly error notification system to inform users about issues.
329-355: Improve error handling insetSubscriptionsByStatus.Currently, errors are logged to the console. Consider implementing a user-friendly error notification system to inform users about issues.
356-378: Improve error handling ingetSubscriptionCount.Currently, errors are logged to the console. Consider implementing a user-friendly error notification system to inform users about issues.
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
Outdated
| getValueFromField( field ) { | ||
| switch (field.type) { | ||
| case 'input-text': | ||
| case 'input-number': | ||
| case 'textarea': | ||
| case 'switcher': | ||
| case 'select': | ||
| return document.querySelector( '#' + field.id ).value; | ||
| case 'time-date': | ||
|
|
||
| return document.querySelector( '#dp-input-' + field.id ).value; | ||
| default: | ||
|
|
||
| return ''; | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider error handling for DOM queries.
The method getValueFromField uses document.querySelector without error handling. Consider adding checks to ensure the element exists before accessing .value.
- return document.querySelector( '#' + field.id ).value;
+ const element = document.querySelector( '#' + field.id );
+ return element ? element.value : '';Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php (1)
94-121: Ensure Script and Style Handles Are RegisteredThe script and style handles
wpuf-admin-subscriptionsandwpuf-subscriptionsare not explicitly registered in the codebase. Ensure these handles are registered usingwp_register_scriptandwp_register_stylebefore enqueuing them in theenqueue_admin_scriptsmethod.
- Check for the registration of
wpuf-admin-subscriptionsandwpuf-subscriptionsin the codebase.- Register these handles if they are not already registered.
Analysis chain
Enqueue Admin Scripts Method Looks Good!
The method is well-structured, ensuring necessary scripts and styles are loaded for the subscription admin page.
Verify the existence of script and style handles.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of script and style handles. # Test: Search for the registration of script and style handles. Expect: Handles should be registered. rg --type php -A 3 $'wp_register_script|wp_register_style'Length of output: 2057
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (10)
- assets/css/admin.css (3 hunks)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Empty.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInnerField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Unsaved.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/stores/subscription.js (1 hunks)
- assets/less/admin.less (3 hunks)
- includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php (15 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- assets/less/admin.less
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- assets/css/admin.css
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Empty.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInnerField.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Unsaved.vue
Additional context used
Biome
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
[error] 32-32: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 36-36: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 52-52: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 80-80: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 100-100: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 101-101: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 186-186: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 195-195: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 202-202: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 214-214: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 220-220: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 262-262: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 267-267: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
Additional comments not posted (12)
assets/js/stores/subscription.js (1)
8-25: State Initialization Looks Good!The state section is well-structured, using
refandreactiveeffectively to manage the subscription-related state.includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php (11)
130-131: Remove Notices Method Looks Good!The method is straightforward and correctly hooks into
in_admin_headerto remove notices.
1013-1030: Get Sections Method Looks Good!The method is well-structured and uses filters effectively to allow customization of sections.
1039-1090: Get Sub-Sections Method Looks Good!The method is well-structured and uses filters effectively to allow customization of sub-sections.
1521-1549: Get Dependent Fields Method Looks Good!The method is well-structured and uses filters effectively to manage field dependencies.
1558-1560: Modify Admin Footer Text Method Looks Good!The method is straightforward and correctly hooks into
admin_footer_textto modify the footer text.
1571-1578: Admin Footer Text Method Looks Good!The method is well-structured and uses translation functions appropriately to construct the footer text.
Line range hint
289-334: Subscription Columns Content Method Looks Good!The method is well-structured, using appropriate functions for data retrieval and display.
Ensure data is sanitized and escaped properly.
Line range hint
13-41: Constructor Hooks Look Good!The hooks in the constructor are well-organized and cover necessary actions for subscription management.
Ensure that all methods referenced in hooks are implemented correctly.
Verification successful
All Hooked Methods Implemented Correctly
All methods referenced in the constructor hooks of
Admin_Subscription.phpare implemented within the file, ensuring proper functionality and integration. No issues found.
- Methods such as
subscription_columns_head,form_updated_message,third_party_cpt_options,enqueue_scripts,subscription_columns_content,add_meta_boxes,profile_subscription_details,profile_subscription_update,add_help_link,remove_notices,enqueue_admin_scripts, andmodify_admin_footer_textare all present.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of methods referenced in hooks. # Test: Search for the implementation of each hooked method. Expect: Each method should be implemented. rg --type php -A 3 $'function subscription_columns_head|function form_updated_message|function third_party_cpt_options|function enqueue_scripts|function subscription_columns_content|function add_meta_boxes|function profile_subscription_details|function profile_subscription_update|function add_help_link|function remove_notices|function enqueue_admin_scripts|function modify_admin_footer_text'Length of output: 6027
1099-1512: Get Fields Method Looks Good!The method is comprehensive and covers various aspects of subscription settings.
Ensure all fields are correctly defined and used.
Verification successful
Fields in
get_fieldsMethod Are Correctly Defined and UtilizedThe fields defined in the
get_fieldsmethod are actively used across the codebase, confirming their correctness and integration into the system.
- Fields like
billing_amount,post_status,post_expiration,expiration_time, and others are used in various files, indicating they are well-integrated and functioning as intended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of field definitions. # Test: Search for the usage of fields in the codebase. Expect: Fields should be used correctly. rg --type php -A 3 $'plan_name|plan_summary|plan_slug|publish_time|post_expiration|expiration_time|post_status|send_mail|expiration_message|post_number_rollback|billing_amount|expire_in|enable_recurring|number_of_posts|number_of_pages|number_of_user_requests|number_of_blocks|number_of_templates|number_of_template_parts|number_of_global_styles|number_of_menus|number_of_featured_items|remove_featured_item'Length of output: 134686
Line range hint
194-266: Profile Subscription Update Method Looks Good!The method includes several security checks and updates user meta effectively.
Ensure all security checks are comprehensive.
Verification successful
Security Checks in
profile_subscription_updateMethod VerifiedThe method includes appropriate security checks such as user capability verification with
current_user_can('edit_users')and nonce verification usingwp_verify_nonce. These measures ensure that only authorized users can perform actions and that requests are authentic.
- File:
includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php- Security Checks:
- User capability:
current_user_can('edit_users')- Nonce verification:
wp_verify_nonceScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the comprehensiveness of security checks. # Test: Search for security checks in the method. Expect: Comprehensive checks for nonce and user capabilities. rg --type php -A 3 $'is_admin|current_user_can|wp_verify_nonce|sanitize_key|sanitize_text_field|intval'Length of output: 187410
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for nonce verification and user capability checks in the profile_subscription_update method. # Locate the Admin_Subscription.php file file_path=$(fd 'Admin_Subscription.php' --type f) # Search for nonce verification and user capability checks within the method rg --type php -A 10 -B 10 'function profile_subscription_update' $file_path | rg 'wp_verify_nonce|current_user_can'Length of output: 394
48-85: Third-Party CPT Options Method Looks Good!The method is well-structured and effectively adds custom post type options.
Ensure that the
get_all_post_typemethod returns the expected data.Verification successful
Verification Complete:
get_all_post_typeReturns Expected DataThe
get_all_post_typemethod correctly unsets certain post types that are not relevant for third-party custom post type options. The remaining post types are returned as expected, ensuring the functionality of thethird_party_cpt_optionsmethod is intact.
- Unset post types:
attachment,revision,nav_menu_item,wpuf_forms,wpuf_profile,wpuf_subscription,wpuf_couponScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the data returned by `get_all_post_type`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `get_all_post_type`. Expect: Method should return expected post types. rg --type php -A 3 $'function get_all_post_type'Length of output: 468
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the `unset` operations in `get_all_post_type` to see which post types are being removed. # Search for unset operations in the `get_all_post_type` method in both files. rg --type php -A 5 'function get_all_post_type' | grep 'unset'Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Get detailed information on `unset` operations in `get_all_post_type`. # Increase context lines to capture full `unset` statements in both files. rg --type php -A 10 'function get_all_post_type' | grep 'unset'Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Directly review the `get_all_post_type` method implementations to see the full context of `unset` operations. # Get full context of the `get_all_post_type` method implementations. rg --type php -A 10 'function get_all_post_type'Length of output: 1422
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
Outdated
| if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| for (const subsection in sections[section]) { | ||
| if (!sections[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Object.hasOwn() Instead of hasOwnProperty.
Replace hasOwnProperty with Object.hasOwn() for better reliability and to avoid issues with objects that do not inherit from Object.prototype.
- if (!sections.hasOwnProperty( section )) {
+ if (!Object.hasOwn(sections, section)) {
- if (!sections[section].hasOwnProperty( subsection )) {
+ if (!Object.hasOwn(sections[section], subsection)) {Also applies to: 52-56
Tools
Biome
[error] 32-32: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 36-36: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
assets/js/stores/subscription.js
Outdated
| .catch( ( error ) => { | ||
| this.setError('fetch', 'An error occurred while updating the subscription.'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve Error Handling in Fetch Calls.
Currently, errors are logged to the console. Consider implementing a user-friendly error notification system to inform users about issues.
- .catch( ( error ) => {
- console.log( error );
+ .catch( ( error ) => {
+ this.setError('fetch', __('An error occurred while updating the subscription.', 'wp-user-frontend'));Also applies to: 317-318, 358-359, 384-385
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value = {}; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const field of this.fields) { | ||
| if (field.hasOwnProperty('type') && field.type === 'inline') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Object.hasOwn() Instead of hasOwnProperty.
Replace hasOwnProperty with Object.hasOwn() for better reliability.
- if (field.hasOwnProperty('type') && field.type === 'inline') {
+ if (Object.hasOwn(field, 'type') && field.type === 'inline') {
- if (this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( field.db_key )) {
+ if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, field.db_key)) {
- if (this.currentSubscription.hasOwnProperty( key )) {
+ if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription, key)) {Also applies to: 101-101, 186-186, 195-195, 202-202, 214-214, 220-220
Tools
Biome
[error] 80-80: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
| let serializedValue = {}; | ||
| if (this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( field.db_key )) { | ||
| serializedValue = this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key]; | ||
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | ||
| } else { | ||
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize populateDefaultValue Logic.
Consider wrapping the serializedValue declaration in a block to restrict its scope to the switch clause.
- let serializedValue = {};
+ {
+ let serializedValue = {};
if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, field.db_key)) {
serializedValue = this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key];
serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default;
} else {
serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default;
}
this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key] = serializedValue;
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let serializedValue = {}; | |
| if (this.currentSubscription.meta_value.hasOwnProperty( field.db_key )) { | |
| serializedValue = this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key]; | |
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | |
| } else { | |
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | |
| } | |
| { | |
| let serializedValue = {}; | |
| if (Object.hasOwn(this.currentSubscription.meta_value, field.db_key)) { | |
| serializedValue = this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key]; | |
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | |
| } else { | |
| serializedValue[field.serialize_key] = field.default; | |
| } | |
| this.currentSubscription.meta_value[field.db_key] = serializedValue; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 100-100: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 101-101: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php (1)
94-120: Ensure Script Registration Before EnqueueingThe
wpuf-admin-subscriptionsscript is enqueued and localized in theenqueue_admin_scriptsmethod without prior registration. This might lead to issues if the script is not available when enqueued. Ensure that the script is registered usingwp_register_scriptbefore enqueueing it.
- Check for the registration of
wpuf-admin-subscriptionsusingwp_register_script.- Verify that the script is properly registered and available when enqueued.
Analysis chain
Verify script enqueueing and localization.
The
enqueue_admin_scriptsmethod enqueues necessary scripts and styles for the subscription page. Ensure that the scripts are correctly enqueued and that the localized data is accurate and complete.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the script enqueueing and localization for the subscription page. # Test: Search for the script handles and ensure they are registered and enqueued correctly. rg --type php -A 5 $'wp_enqueue_script(\'wpuf-admin-subscriptions\')'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the registration and conditional enqueueing of the 'wpuf-admin-subscriptions' script. # Search for the registration of the 'wpuf-admin-subscriptions' script. rg --type php -A 5 $'wp_register_script(\'wpuf-admin-subscriptions\')' # Search for any conditional enqueueing of the 'wpuf-admin-subscriptions' script. rg --type php -A 5 'wpuf-admin-subscriptions'Length of output: 1028
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (5)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInnerField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Subsection.vue (1 hunks)
- includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php (15 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInnerField.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Subsection.vue
Additional comments not posted (7)
includes/Admin/Admin_Subscription.php (7)
17-19: Ensure hooks are correctly implemented.The addition of hooks for
wpuf_subscription_additional_fieldsand others enhances modularity. Verify that the methods associated with these hooks are correctly defined and functional.
1531-1559: Verify dependent field definitions and filters.The
get_dependent_fieldsmethod defines fields that depend on other fields. Ensure that the dependent fields are accurately defined and that thewpuf_subscriptions_dependent_fieldsfilter is applied correctly.
1039-1100: Verify sub-section definitions and filters.The
get_sub_sectionsmethod defines sub-sections for subscription settings. Ensure that the sub-sections are accurately defined and that thewpuf_subscription_sub_sectionsfilter is applied correctly.
1109-1522: Verify field definitions and filters.The
get_fieldsmethod defines fields for subscription settings sections. Ensure that the fields are accurately defined and that thewpuf_subscriptions_fieldsfilter is applied correctly.
1013-1030: Verify section definitions and filters.The
get_sectionsmethod defines sections for subscription settings. Ensure that the sections are accurately defined and that thewpuf_subscriptions_sectionsfilter is applied correctly.
38-40: Verify the new hooks for subscription page loading.The hooks for
wpuf_load_subscription_pageare newly added. Ensure that these hooks are triggered correctly and that the associated methods (remove_notices,enqueue_admin_scripts,modify_admin_footer_text) are functioning as intended.
48-84: Verify third-party CPT options logic.The method
third_party_cpt_optionsadds custom post type options while ignoring certain types. Ensure that the logic for filtering and adding options is correct and that the integration with third-party plugins works as expected.Verification successful
Logic for filtering and adding third-party CPT options is correct.
The
third_party_cpt_optionsmethod correctly integrates with theget_all_post_typefunction, which retrieves and filters post types as expected. This ensures that only relevant post types are considered for additional options. No issues found with the current implementation.
get_all_post_typecorrectly excludes unwanted post types.third_party_cpt_optionseffectively uses this filtered list.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic for filtering and adding third-party custom post type options. # Test: Search for the method usage and verify the integration with third-party plugins. rg --type php -A 5 $'third_party_cpt_options'Length of output: 1043
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of `get_all_post_type` method to verify it retrieves the correct post types. # Search for the definition of `get_all_post_type` method in the codebase. ast-grep --lang php --pattern 'function get_all_post_type() { $$$ }'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of `get_all_post_type` method in classes or traits. # Search for the `get_all_post_type` method within classes or traits in the codebase. rg --type php 'function get_all_post_type'Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the implementation of `get_all_post_type` in identified files. # Display the implementation of `get_all_post_type` in `class/subscription.php`. rg --type php -A 10 -B 2 'function get_all_post_type' class/subscription.php # Display the implementation of `get_all_post_type` in `includes/Admin/Subscription.php`. rg --type php -A 10 -B 2 'function get_all_post_type' includes/Admin/Subscription.phpLength of output: 988
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- assets/css/admin.css (3 hunks)
- assets/less/admin.less (3 hunks)
- includes/Admin/Menu.php (2 hunks)
- includes/Frontend.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- assets/css/admin.css
- assets/less/admin.less
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- includes/Admin/Menu.php
- includes/Frontend.php
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (3)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInnerField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInnerField.vue
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (2)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tailwind.config.js
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css
Rubaiyat-E-Mohammad
added
QA Approved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
assets/js/subscriptions.min.jsis excluded by!**/*.min.js
Files selected for processing (5)
- assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/Popup.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue (1 hunks)
- assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vue (1 hunks)
- languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (50 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (81)
assets/js/components/subscriptions/Popup.vue (5)
2-4: Ensure necessary imports.Verify that all imported modules are necessary and used within the component.
6-8: Correct usage of emits and store.The emits and store are correctly defined and used.
9-24: Correct computed property.The computed property correctly switches between different subscription statuses.
26-32: Correct action handler.The action handler correctly emits events based on the subscription status.
35-74: Ensure accessibility and correct data bindings.The template structure is correct and accessible. Data bindings and event handlers are correctly used.
assets/js/components/subscriptions/SubscriptionBox.vue (16)
2-5: Ensure necessary imports.Verify that all imported modules are necessary and used within the component.
14-16: Correct props definition.The props are correctly defined and used.
18-24: Correct usage of refs and emits.The refs and emits are correctly defined and used.
32-48: Correct function implementation.The function
setPillBackgroundcorrectly sets the background color based on the subscription status.
50-56: Correct function implementation.The functions
showQuickMenuandhideQuickMenucorrectly toggle the quick menu status.
58-71: Correct directive implementation.The
vClickOutsidedirective correctly handles click outside events.
73-91: Correct function implementation.The function
getSubscriberscorrectly fetches the subscribers for the subscription.
94-105: Correct function implementation.The function
setBillingAmountcorrectly sets the billing amount based on the subscription details.
108-110: Correct computed property.The computed property
isRecurringcorrectly determines if the subscription is recurring.
112-117: Correct lifecycle hook usage.The
onBeforeMountlifecycle hook correctly initializes the component state.
119-121: Correct computed property.The computed property
titlecorrectly returns the subscription title.
123-130: Correct function implementation.The functions
trashSubscription,restoreSubscription,deleteSubscription, andtoggleSubscriptionStatuscorrectly handle subscription status changes.
158-185: Correct function implementation.The function
processPromiseResultcorrectly handles the result of a promise.
187-201: Correct computed property.The computed property
postStatuscorrectly returns the formatted post status.
203-205: Correct computed property.The computed property
isPasswordProtectedcorrectly determines if the subscription is password protected.
209-297: Ensure accessibility and correct data bindings.The template structure is correct and accessible. Data bindings and event handlers are correctly used.
assets/js/components/subscriptions/SectionInputField.vue (21)
2-5: Ensure necessary imports.Verify that all imported modules are necessary and used within the component.
12-13: Correct emits definition.The emits are correctly defined and used.
18-25: Correct props definition.The props are correctly defined and used.
27-30: Correct usage of refs and store.The refs and store are correctly defined and used.
33-34: Correct ref definition.The ref
publishedDateis correctly defined and initialized.
35-37: Correct computed property.The computed property
showProBadgecorrectly determines if the pro badge should be shown.
39-49: Correct function implementation.The function
getFieldValuecorrectly returns the field value based on the field type.
52-56: Correct computed property.The computed property
valuecorrectly returns the modified field value.
58-76: Correct function implementation.The function
getModifiedValuecorrectly returns the modified field value based on the field type.
78-85: Correct function implementation.The function
handleDatecorrectly handles date changes.
88-96: Correct function implementation.The function
toggleOnOffcorrectly toggles the switch status.
98-100: Correct computed property.The computed property
showFieldcorrectly determines if the field should be shown.
102-115: Correct function implementation.The function
modifySubscriptioncorrectly modifies the subscription based on the field type.
118-122: Correct function implementation.The function
processInputcorrectly processes input events.
124-129: Correct function implementation.The function
processNumbercorrectly processes number input events.
131-137: Correct computed property.The computed property
optionscorrectly returns the options for the multi-select field.
139-147: Correct function implementation.The function
onMultiSelectChangecorrectly handles changes to the multi-select field.
149-160: Correct computed property.The computed property
fieldLabelClassescorrectly returns the CSS classes for the field label.
162-166: Correct lifecycle hook usage.The
onMountedlifecycle hook correctly initializes the component state for switcher fields.
168-195: Correct lifecycle hook usage.The
onMountedlifecycle hook correctly initializes the component state for multi-select fields.
214-350: Ensure accessibility and correct data bindings.The template structure is correct and accessible. Data bindings and event handlers are correctly used.
assets/css/admin/subscriptions.min.css (29)
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.hollow-dots-spinneris correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS animations.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.multiselectis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.dp__inputis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and accessibility.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.dp__menuis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.dp__overlayis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.dp__calendaris correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.dp__buttonis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-avataris correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-tooltipis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-loadingis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS animations and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-tooltipis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS styling and responsiveness.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-sr-onlyis correctly implemented and follows best practices for accessibility.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-fixedis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-absoluteis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-relativeis correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-inset-0is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-inset-y-0is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf--left-20is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-left-0is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-left-\[-2\%\]is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-left-\[-20px\]is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-left-\[calc\(50\%-5rem\)\]is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-right-0is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-right-4is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-right-6is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-right-8is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-top-0is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-top-1\/3is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
1-1: LGTM!The CSS rule for
.wpuf-top-20is correctly implemented and follows best practices for CSS positioning.The code changes are approved.
languages/wp-user-frontend.pot (10)
7-7: LGTM!The metadata change is correct.
The code changes are approved.
106-107: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "Subscriptions" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
112-112: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "Transactions" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
117-117: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "Tools" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
122-122: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "Premium" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
126-126: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "Help" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
136-137: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "Settings" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
141-142: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "Subscribers" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
146-146: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "Number of items per page:" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
162-162: LGTM!The addition of the new localization string for "WPUF Import Forms" is correct.
The code changes are approved.
…tion_design_followups
Finalized UI Enhancement for Subscription Module.
fixes #620
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes