You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you and your team for developing the curatedMetagenomicData package. I have encountered some confusion when using this package. Firstly, whether the relative abundance table has been standardized and does not need to consider the batch of the study? Is this the final relative abundance table?
Secondly, I downloaded a cancer data from different studies using curatedMetagenomicData, and whether the study factor needs to be considered when finding the significantly different microbiome using massLin. Or, what other analysis methods for finding the significantly different microbiome are recommended when using curatedMetagenomicData? Or, do I need to follow this tutorial (vignettes/Sex_metaanalysis_vignette.Rmd). Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you and your team for developing the curatedMetagenomicData package. I have encountered some confusion when using this package. Firstly, whether the relative abundance table has been standardized and does not need to consider the batch of the study? Is this the final relative abundance table?
Secondly, I downloaded a cancer data from different studies using curatedMetagenomicData, and whether the study factor needs to be considered when finding the significantly different microbiome using massLin. Or, what other analysis methods for finding the significantly different microbiome are recommended when using curatedMetagenomicData? Or, do I need to follow this tutorial (vignettes/Sex_metaanalysis_vignette.Rmd). Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: