Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Applications: adding dotnix-follow-up #2492

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Ra33it0
Copy link
Contributor

@Ra33it0 Ra33it0 commented Jan 27, 2025

Project Abstract

Follow-up Application of Dotnix: Nix-based Polkadot Validators with an emphasis on security.

If your application is a follow-up to a previous grant, please mention which one in the first line of the abstract and include a link to previous pull requests if applicable.

Grant level

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (project_name.md).
  • I have read the application guidelines.
  • Payment details have been provided (Polkadot AssetHub (USDC & DOT) address in the application and bank details via email, if applicable).
  • I understand that an agreed upon percentage of each milestone will be paid in vested DOT, to the Polkadot address listed in the application.
  • I am aware that, in order to receive a grant, I (and the entity I represent) have to successfully complete a KYC/KYB check.
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).

@github-actions github-actions bot added the admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. label Jan 27, 2025
@semuelle
Copy link
Member

@Lederstrumpf, @ajk-code, curious to hear your thoughts.

@semuelle semuelle self-assigned this Jan 28, 2025
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Müller <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@semuelle semuelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again for the application and sorry for the long wait. I see that you integrated most of the feedback you received in the previous application, but could you summarize the changes from the old one to this one?

Also, in the previous application you mentioned having plans for subsequent grants. We usually encourage teams to aim for independent funding, at least after the second grant, so could you comment on how you might fund further development (and maintenance) beyond this grant?

Comment on lines +6 to +7
- **DOT-sporyon:** 1Z765yAFnVpzYT7Vk2wKaePoP1YGdYQ5yUw3nVEyu2DYju8
- **DOT-tv:** 1Qtup4rW7TCCryMTH6UB7Fx2cN8ntbNyYVhbjRZiHP7skXQ
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please list one AssetHub address for USDC and one Polkadot address for DOT.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin-review This application requires a review from an admin.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants