Skip to content

2024‐04‐12

Jump to bottom
Bruce Bailey edited this page Apr 12, 2024 · 19 revisions

Meeting minutes April 12th 2024

Attending (9): Michael Gower, Alastair Campbell, Bruce Bailey, Patrick Lauke, Avon Kuo, Francis Storr, Giacomo Petri, Lori Oakley.
Regrets: Scott O'Hara

Please be encouraged to assign yourself to items, and be prepared to walk group through the PR or proposed reply.

Misc issue discuss

  • Issue #3539 came up on AG WG call, that even as errata might have additional process.

3763

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3757/files

Drafted column review

PR 3778 Mike pointed out that 2.0 has Glossary labeled as an Appendix, but notes Glossary as Normative. Alastair will be discussing with Kevin how to regain Appendix formatting.

  • Issue 3518 Changing OL to UL where relevant. Need to check that it doesn't disrupt the build-process, particularly for the techniques. Otherwise ready for a reviewer.
  • Issue 3693 Bug fix, looks good.

Moved back to In progress

Moved to Ready for approval

  • 3636
  • 3697
  • 3774
  • 3705
  • 3638
  • 3734 note referenced numbers can be confused. Also, per FS notes, ARIA levels 10+ do not read correctly.
  • 3736
  • [3518][https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3518)

Left in drafted

  • 3518 Could use a build -- 1st file, notes on conformance , needs check
  • 3272
  • 3272 Ask for feedback from Gundala or others
  • [3642] needs clean proposed response then can be moved to ready for approval
  • 3189 a bit heavy, plan to revisit in future meeting.
  • 3630 -- please review for next week. A significant issue with reflow
  • 3776 -- discussion was to change to a proposed response rather than PR
  • [3779]

Open discussion

Avon asked if TF members spots very old issues which you think are closed, what is the process? Please ping chairs or the list, so we can develop a process. Patrick mentioned that there are some orphaned branches, left over from migration to GitHub. Mike had one of these recently.

Giacomo asked about status of H35. There are techniques which are not current, but can turn up, especially in quick ref.

Standing Agenda

  1. Review ‘For discussion’ items
  2. Review ‘Drafted’ items (30 min), either:
    • move back to In progress, with more work to do
    • move to Ready for approval, if there is general agreement the issue is sufficiently resolved
    • leave in Drafted, if discussion was not concluded satisfactorily
  3. Review ‘To do’.
  4. Time permitting, items of interest to participants, including open discussions.

Wiki menu

Clone this wiki locally