Add test report for jsonld-cpp #602
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Sorry, I didn't have my w3c and github accounts linked. I'll take care of that asap. |
|
gkellogg marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg. |
gkellogg
approved these changes
May 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We would like to submit a test report for our open source C++ implementation of the JSON-LD 1.1 processing algorithms and api called 'jsonld-cpp'. The implementation is not complete, but we have "expand()" and "toRDF()" working well enough to pass nearly all of the tests. Our current test results are:
Expansion 376/376 (100.0%)
Transform JSON-LD to RDF 455/456 (99.8%)
We are planning to finish the full implementation sometime soon, but probably won't get working on it until after this summer. We've had these two algorithms mostly working for some time now and wanted to get it in as a WIP implementation in case it could help anyone.