Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Changing tables into SCtable format. References #5
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@unintendedbear
unintendedbear committed Jun 21, 2017
1 parent fe83c1e commit d59e440
Showing 1 changed file with 34 additions and 60 deletions.
94 changes: 34 additions & 60 deletions Chapters/02-byodSotA.tex
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -204,66 +204,40 @@ \section{MUSES Advantages over Other Solutions. Beyond the State of the Art}
Table \ref{tab:taxonomy} summarizes the features of the main analyzed tools, with respect to the proposed taxonomy in Section \ref{sec:toolsreview}. Also, Table \ref{tab:features} shows the features of the analyzed products considering licenses, type of supported devices, and price.
% Antonio - Antares, ¿podrías incluir en la comparativa las otras herramientas que se han analizado? Las de Citrix, WSO2, Azzurri, Good...

\begin{table}[ht]
\begin{footnotesize}
\centering
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{2.0}% Spread rows out...
% \resizebox{12cm}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{>{\centering\bfseries}m{0.6in} >{\centering}m{0.6in} >{\centering}m{0.6in} >{\centering}m{0.6in} >{\centering}m{0.6in} >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{0.6in}}
\toprule
& \textbf{Offline threat detection method} & \textbf{Updatable database} & \textbf{Standalone} & \textbf{Non-invasive data access} & \textbf{Superuser system control} \\
\midrule
MUSES & \cmark & \cmark & \cmark & \cmark & \cmark \\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.6}\hline
IBM Mobile Security & \xmark & \xmark & \cmark & \xmark & \xmark \\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.6}\hline
Sophos Mobile Control & \cmark & \xmark & \cmark & \xmark & \xmark \\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.6}\hline
Samsung Knox & \cmark & \xmark & \cmark & \cmark & \cmark\\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.6}\hline
Blackbery Balance & \xmark & \xmark & \cmark & \cmark & \cmark\\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.6}\hline
Blackphone & \nmark & \nmark & \cmark & \cmark & \cmark\\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.6}\hline
Android for Work & \cmark & \xmark & \cmark & \cmark & \cmark\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
% }
\end{footnotesize}
\caption{Features of the analyzed tools with regard to the proposed taxonomy to classify BYOD systems (see Section \ref{sec:toolsreview}).}
\label{tab:taxonomy}
\end{table}

\begin{table}[ht]
\begin{footnotesize}
\centering
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.8}% Spread rows out...
% \resizebox{8cm}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{>{\centering\bfseries}m{1in} >{\centering}m{1in} >{\centering}m{1in} >{\centering\arraybackslash}m{1in}}
\toprule
& \textbf{License} & \textbf{Devices} & \textbf{Price} \\
\midrule
MUSES & OpenSource & Android, Windows 8.1, Windows Phone, iOS & Free \\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.8}\hline
IBM Mobile Security & Proprietary & iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Blackberry & By Request\\\\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.8}\hline
Sophos Mobile Control & Proprietary & iOS, Android, Windows Phone & By Request\\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.8}\hline
Samsung Knox and Blackbery Balance & Proprietary & Android Samsung Devices and iOS & 12\$ per year/device \\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.8}\hline
Blackphone & Proprietary & Own device & 120\$ per year \\
\arrayrulecolor[gray]{0.8}\hline
Android for Work & Proprietary & Android and devices with Chrome Browser & 12\$ per month/user\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
% }
\end{footnotesize}
\caption{Features of the analyzed products considering licenses, type of devices and OS, and price.}
\label{tab:features}
\end{table}
% Antonio - Antares, ¿no había más tablas?
% Por favor, que alguien rellene los datos de la solución de IBM. ¿Fergu?¿Antares?
% Quizá habría que indicar que MUSES se puede instalar en PC también en la tabla. ¿Sabéis si los demás se puede o son sólo para smartphones/tablets?
\begin{SCtable}[][tb]
\resizebox{11cm}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{llllll}
\hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoSuave}{} & {\em \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Offline threat\\ detection method\end{tabular}} & {\em \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Updatable\\ database\end{tabular}} & {\em Standalone} & {\em \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Non-invasive\\ data access\end{tabular}} & {\em \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Superuser\\ system control\end{tabular}} \\\hline\hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoMasSuave}MUSES & \checkmark & \checkmark & \checkmark & \checkmark & \checkmark \\\hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoSuave}IBM Mobile Security & & & \checkmark & & \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoMasSuave}Sophos Mobile Control & \checkmark & & \checkmark & & \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoSuave}Samsung KNOX & \checkmark & & \checkmark & \checkmark & \checkmark \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoMasSuave}Blackberry Balance & & & \checkmark & \checkmark & \checkmark \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoSuave}Blackphone & - & - & \checkmark & \checkmark & \checkmark \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoMasSuave}Android for Work & \checkmark & & \checkmark & \checkmark & \checkmark \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\caption{Features of the analysed tools with regard to the proposed taxonomy to classify BYOD systems.}
\label{tab:taxonomy}
\end{SCtable}

\begin{SCtable}[][tb]
\resizebox{11cm}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{llll}
\hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoSuave}{} & {\em License} & {\em Devices} & {\em Price} \\\hline\hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoMasSuave}MUSES & OpenSource & \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Android, iOS,\\Windows 8.1,\\Windows Phone\end{tabular} & Free \\\hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoSuave}IBM Mobile Security& Proprietary & \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Android, iOS,\\Windows Phone,\\Blackberry\end{tabular} & By request \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoMasSuave}Sophos Mobile Control & Proprietary & \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Android, iOS,\\Windows Phone\end{tabular} & By request \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoSuave}Samsung KNOX & Proprietary & \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Android, iOS,\\Samsung devices\end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}12\$ per\\year/device\end{tabular} \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoMasSuave}Blackphone & Proprietary & Own device & 120\$ per year \\ \hline
\rowcolor{colorCorporativoSuave}Android for Work & Proprietary & \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Android,\\devices with\\Chrome browser\end{tabular} & \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}12\$ per\\month/user\end{tabular} \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\caption{Features of the analysed products considering licenses, type of devices and OS, and price..}
\label{tab:features}
\end{SCtable}


Another comparison would be that the existing products are mostly policy-based, while MUSES makes its decisions not only considering policies, but also based on the terminals and users context, such as connection properties, or trust value of the device, to really understand the real risk that comes with a specific action.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit d59e440

Please sign in to comment.