Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Mobile] [UMA-1096] Implement social login signing for send tez operation #2368

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

OKendigelyan
Copy link
Contributor

@OKendigelyan OKendigelyan commented Feb 5, 2025

Proposed changes

Task link

Types of changes

  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Refactor
  • Breaking change
  • UI fix

Screenshots

Screen.Recording.2025-02-05.at.12.55.31.mov

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
umami-embed-iframe 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Feb 6, 2025 11:53am
umami-embed-iframe-ghostnet ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 6, 2025 11:53am
umami-v2-web ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 6, 2025 11:53am
umami-v2-web-storybook ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 6, 2025 11:53am

@OKendigelyan OKendigelyan force-pushed the UMA-1096/impltement-social-transaction-signing branch from cd44d16 to c50b63e Compare February 5, 2025 12:50
@OKendigelyan OKendigelyan force-pushed the UMA-1096/impltement-social-transaction-signing branch from c50b63e to 182d7dd Compare February 5, 2025 12:59
@OKendigelyan OKendigelyan changed the title [Mobile] [UMA-1096] Implement social transaction signing for send tez operation [Mobile] [UMA-1096] Implement social login signing for send tez operation Feb 5, 2025
@OKendigelyan OKendigelyan marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2025 13:03
@OKendigelyan OKendigelyan force-pushed the UMA-1096/impltement-social-transaction-signing branch from 182d7dd to 698998c Compare February 5, 2025 13:18
<ModalProvider>
<AuthProvider>
<Stack screenOptions={{ headerShown: false }}>
<Stack.Screen name="index" options={{ gestureEnabled: false }} />
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can set the gestureEnabled option at stack level so you can avoid repeating it for each screen

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants