-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Panzer: Look into #13717 decomposition issue #13828
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Bryan Reuter <[email protected]>
<ParameterList name="Initial Conditions"> | ||
<ParameterList name="left"> | ||
<ParameterList name="TEMPERATURE"> | ||
<Parameter name="Value" type="double" value="0.0"/> | ||
</ParameterList> | ||
</ParameterList> | ||
<ParameterList name="right"> | ||
<ParameterList name="TEMPERATURE"> | ||
<Parameter name="Value" type="double" value="1.0"/> | ||
</ParameterList> | ||
</ParameterList> | ||
</ParameterList> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rppawlo So far I've just decomposed the mesh as they instructed and run with inconsistent IC's on the two blocks. That does not seem to give a wonky solution, see attached.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you rerun with 2 or 3 mpi processes? I think 1 looks correct. You may have to check that the initial conditions are printed at the right time. The unit test required some work on IO to be able to reproduce the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rppawlo This is on 3 mpi processes. I didn't do any of the IO work to visualize the IC; however, I thought we determined that the BC issue should persist to the steady-state solution. I'm not seeing it at the moment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18e54/18e54362666ab6cce71e916645f10fb82e42baff" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-26 at 1 13 52 PM"
@rppawlo This is on 3 MPI processes with interval 7. This is the converged solution. I don't fully understand what is different between this and the case I ran the other day so need to do some digging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, so its your change in the Dirichlet boundary condition which now imposes a consistent BC (with the IC) as opposed to 0.0
on the top and 1.0
on the boundary. Is that what you would expect?
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - Auto Inspected - Inspection is Not Necessary for this Pull Request. |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Testing Jenkins Projects: Pull Request Auto Testing STARTING (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: PR_gcc-openmpi-openmp
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_gcc-openmpi_debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_clang
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_cuda
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_intel
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_cuda-uvm
Jenkins Parameters
Using Repos:
Pull Request Author: reuterb |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Jenkins Testing: all Jobs PASSED Pull Request Auto Testing has PASSED (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: PR_gcc-openmpi-openmp
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_gcc-openmpi_debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_clang
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_cuda
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_intel
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: PR_cuda-uvm
Jenkins Parameters
|
Status Flag 'Pre-Merge Inspection' - - This Pull Request Requires Inspection... The code must be inspected by a member of the Team before Testing/Merging |
All Jobs Finished; status = PASSED, However Inspection must be performed before merge can occur... |
2 similar comments
All Jobs Finished; status = PASSED, However Inspection must be performed before merge can occur... |
All Jobs Finished; status = PASSED, However Inspection must be performed before merge can occur... |
All Jobs Finished; status = PASSED, However Inspection must be performed before merge can occur... |
Signed-off-by: Roger Pawlowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roger Pawlowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roger Pawlowski <[email protected]>
@trilinos/
Motivation
Related Issues
put-issue-number-here
Stakeholder Feedback
Testing