You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The setupWorker initialization for MSW is conditionally executed in development mode. Ensure this does not interfere with production builds or cause unexpected behavior.
The filtering logic for params.includeSuspended in the apis.getUsers handler may not include suspended users as expected. Verify the logic aligns with the intended behavior.
Why: Adding error handling to the enableMocking function ensures that any issues during the asynchronous process are captured and logged, improving the robustness and debuggability of the application.
9
General
日付文字列のフォーマットが正しいかを保証するために ISO 8601 検証を追加します。
sampleContestDetail の duration フィールドに含まれる日付文字列が ISO 8601 形式であることを確認し、フォーマットの検証を追加してください。
duration: {
- since: '2021-01-01T00:00:00Z',- until: '2024-01-01T00:00:00Z'+ since: new Date('2021-01-01T00:00:00Z').toISOString(),+ until: new Date('2024-01-01T00:00:00Z').toISOString()
}
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
Why: Ensuring that date strings are in ISO 8601 format improves data consistency and prevents potential issues with date parsing. However, the suggestion assumes the need for validation without evidence of a problem in the PR.
duration: {
since: { year: 2015, semester: 0 },
- until: { year: 2100, semester: 1 }+ until: { year: 2025, semester: 1 } // Adjusted to a more reasonable future year
}
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: The suggestion highlights a potential issue with an unusually distant future year, which could be a mistake or intentional. While the adjustment is reasonable, it assumes the original value is incorrect without confirmation.
Why: Making the sample URLs unique could improve the realism of the mock data, but it is not critical to the functionality of the code. The suggestion assumes the need for uniqueness without clear justification.
Why: The suggestion highlights a potential security risk by pointing out that the public directory might unintentionally expose sensitive files. It proposes using a safer directory (src/mocks), which could improve security. However, it is not actionable without further context about the project's structure.
Why: The suggestion emphasizes checking for vulnerabilities in the newly added msw library and ensuring its version is up-to-date. While this is a good practice, the proposed version change to "2.8.0" is speculative and lacks justification, slightly reducing its impact.
Wrap the mock initialization in a conditional block to restrict it to development mode
await initMock() should be wrapped in a conditional block to ensure it only executes in development mode, avoiding potential issues in production environments.
Why: Wrapping await initMock() in a conditional block ensures it only runs in development mode, which is crucial for avoiding unintended behavior or performance issues in production environments. This suggestion directly improves the correctness and safety of the code.
9
Restrict the usage of setupWorker to browser environments to prevent runtime issues
Ensure setupWorker is only imported and executed in a browser environment to avoid runtime errors in non-browser contexts.
Why: Ensuring setupWorker is only executed in a browser environment prevents runtime errors in non-browser contexts, which is a practical improvement for robustness. However, the suggestion could be more explicit about handling the asynchronous import.
8
Add validation to ensure all fields in the mock data are correctly populated
Validate the sampleContestTeamDetails array to ensure all required fields are present and correctly formatted to prevent runtime errors.
Why: Adding validation to the sampleContestTeamDetails array ensures data consistency and prevents potential runtime errors. While useful, this improvement is not critical as the mock data is primarily for testing purposes.
Why: The incorrect parameter name directly contradicts the API route and could cause runtime errors. Fixing this is critical for the functionality of the handler, making this suggestion highly impactful.
10
Ensure mock initialization is restricted to the development environment
await initMock() should be wrapped in a condition to ensure it only executes in a development environment, as it may cause unintended behavior in production.
Why: Wrapping await initMock() in a development environment check is highly relevant and prevents potential issues in production, where mock initialization could cause unintended behavior. This suggestion directly improves the correctness and safety of the code.
9
Fix incorrect type comparison in the user groups handler
The conditional check if (params.userId === 'true') in the apis.getUserGroups handler is problematic as it compares a string to a boolean-like value, which may lead to unexpected behavior.
Why: Correcting the type comparison ensures the handler functions as intended and avoids potential bugs caused by mismatched types. This is a significant improvement to the code's reliability.
Why: The suggestion highlights a valid concern regarding the potential issues caused by changing "moduleResolution" to "bundler". While the change in the PR might be intentional, this suggestion encourages testing to ensure compatibility, which is important for maintaining functionality.
Why: The suggestion raises a valid point about the potential loss of compatibility with older browsers or environments when changing "target" to "esnext". It encourages verifying the impact of this change, which is crucial for ensuring broad compatibility.
7
Populate id and displayName fields in sample accounts to avoid potential issues
The sampleAccounts array contains empty id and displayName fields, which might lead to issues if these fields are expected to be unique or non-empty.
Why: Populating the id and displayName fields improves the sample data's quality and prevents potential issues if these fields are expected to be unique or non-empty. However, the impact is moderate since this is sample/mock data.
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that typescript is listed as a peer dependency for msw but is not explicitly added to devDependencies. Adding it ensures compatibility and avoids potential issues during development. However, the suggestion is not critical since typescript might already be installed in the environment.
if (import.meta.env.DEV) {
const server = setupWorker(...handlers)
await server.start({ onUnhandledRequest: 'bypass' })
+} else {+ console.warn('Mock server is not started as the environment is not development.')
}
Why: The suggestion adds a script to ensure the public directory exists, which is a good precaution to prevent runtime errors. However, it is not critical as the directory might already exist or be created manually by the developer.
Ensure await is used within an async function or module to avoid runtime errors
await cannot be used at the top level in this file unless it is within an async function or module. Ensure the file is marked as an ES module by adding "type": "module" in package.json or wrap the await calls in an async function.
Why: The suggestion addresses a critical issue where await is used at the top level, which is not allowed unless within an async function or module. Wrapping the code in an immediately invoked async function ensures proper execution and prevents runtime errors.
9
Add a fallback for when no user matches the userId to prevent returning undefined
The users.find call in apis.getUser may return undefined if no user matches the userId, which could cause issues. Add a check to handle this case and return an appropriate response.
-return HttpResponse.json(users.find(user => user.id === params.userId))+const user = users.find(user => user.id === params.userId)+return user ? HttpResponse.json(user) : HttpResponse.error(404, 'User not found')
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: The suggestion provides a robust improvement by handling cases where no user matches the userId. Returning an appropriate error response prevents potential issues caused by returning undefined.
8
Correct the condition to properly filter based on the userId parameter
The params.userId === 'true' condition in apis.getUserProjects and apis.getUserContests appears incorrect, as userId is likely not a boolean string. Verify and adjust the condition to properly filter based on userId.
Why: The suggestion identifies a potential logical error in the condition params.userId === 'true', which is unlikely to be correct. Adjusting the condition to check for a valid userId improves the accuracy and functionality of the code.
7
General
Ensure the specified worker directory exists and is correctly configured for MSW
Why: The suggestion is valid and highlights the importance of verifying the existence and proper configuration of the "public" directory specified in msw.workerDirectory. This is crucial for the correct functioning of MSW workers. However, it is not a direct code change but rather a recommendation to verify the setup, which slightly reduces its actionable impact.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
User description
fix #128 の予定
各ファイルに書かれたサンプルデータをもとにしたモックを実装することにより、表示したい内容の入れ替えを簡単にできるようにした
ただ、これまで prism を使っていたときのようにスキーマからの自動生成は行えなくなっているので、ここだけどうするかを考える必要がありそう
prism と今回のモックを共存させて、どちらを使うかを自由に選べればより便利になりそう？
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
src/mocks/handler.tsにて、すべてのモックハンドラーを統合してエクスポートする仕組みを追加しました。vite.config.tsから不要なプロキシ設定を削除しました。public/mockServiceWorker.jsにMSWのワーカーを追加しました。package.jsonおよびpackage-lock.jsonにMSW関連の依存関係を追加しました。tsconfig.jsonから未使用のtypeRoots設定を削除しました。Changes walkthrough 📝
7 files
Added MSW setup for development environmentImplemented mock handlers for contests APIImplemented mock handlers for groups APICombined all mock handlers into a single exportImplemented mock handlers for projects APIImplemented mock handlers for users APIAdded MSW worker script2 files
Removed unused PNG type declarationRemoved unused SVG type declaration3 files
Updated Vite environment type referencesRemoved proxy server configurationRemoved unused `typeRoots` configuration2 files
Updated dependencies to include MSW and related packagesAdded MSW configuration and dependencies