-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests: receiver precedence #1742
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
-
Let's rename the strings for
receiverKind
according to theBinaryReceiverSelector
type. -
we also need to test precedence for
bounce
andexternal
receivers
} | ||
|
||
receive("message") { | ||
self.receiverKind = "message"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
self.receiverKind = "message"; | |
self.receiverKind = "comment"; |
Let's also document the precedence in the Tact docs |
…that declaration order does not have an effect on receiver precedence order.
…n there is no receiver for incomming message, in order to match claim in documentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Issue
Closes #1741.
Checklist