Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR #100) #114

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2020
Merged

Conversation

pierventre
Copy link
Collaborator

In the previous patch, a "break" was missed when the code has been ported from ONOS.
Additionally, makes a further optimization: does not send hashed and next_vlan flows.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2020

The author of this PR, pierventre, is not an activated member of this organization on Codecov.
Please activate this user on Codecov to display this PR comment.
Coverage data is still being uploaded to Codecov.io for purposes of overall coverage calculations.
Please don't hesitate to email us at [email protected] with any questions.

@pudelkoM
Copy link
Member

Previous meaning PR #100?

@pierventre
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Previous meaning PR #100?

@pudelkoM yep!

@pudelkoM
Copy link
Member

Could you include PR #100 in the title? Makes it easier to cross reference later.

In the previous patch (PR #100), a "break" was missed when the code has been ported from ONOS.
Additionally, makes a further optimization: does not send hashed and next_vlan flows.
@pierventre pierventre changed the title [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR #100) Oct 20, 2020
@pierventre pierventre changed the title [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR #100) [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR [#100](https://github.com/stratum/fabric-tna/pull/100)) Oct 20, 2020
@pierventre pierventre changed the title [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR [#100](https://github.com/stratum/fabric-tna/pull/100)) [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR #100) Oct 20, 2020
@ccascone
Copy link
Member

retest this please, Jenkins failed because of #98

@pierventre
Copy link
Collaborator Author

anything else from my side ? Can we merge ?

@ccascone ccascone merged commit 155c142 into master Oct 22, 2020
@ccascone ccascone deleted the fix-fix-modify branch October 22, 2020 16:59
bocon13 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2020
* [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR #100)

In the previous patch (PR #100), a "break" was missed when the code has been ported from ONOS.
Additionally, makes a further optimization: does not send hashed and next_vlan flows.

* Updates ONOS deps and re-add "fail" instruction that was wrongly removed.
bocon13 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2020
* [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR #100)

In the previous patch (PR #100), a "break" was missed when the code has been ported from ONOS.
Additionally, makes a further optimization: does not send hashed and next_vlan flows.

* Updates ONOS deps and re-add "fail" instruction that was wrongly removed.
bocon13 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2020
* [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR #100)

In the previous patch (PR #100), a "break" was missed when the code has been ported from ONOS.
Additionally, makes a further optimization: does not send hashed and next_vlan flows.

* Updates ONOS deps and re-add "fail" instruction that was wrongly removed.
bocon13 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2020
* [AETHER-514] Fix the previous patch (PR #100)

In the previous patch (PR #100), a "break" was missed when the code has been ported from ONOS.
Additionally, makes a further optimization: does not send hashed and next_vlan flows.

* Updates ONOS deps and re-add "fail" instruction that was wrongly removed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants