Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: use node snap for build #347

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jnsgruk
Copy link
Member

@jnsgruk jnsgruk commented Jan 22, 2025

When I first switched this snap to build from source, I couldn't make the process succeed using the node snap, which led to a rather more complicated method for obtaining and configuring nodejs.

Taking another look, the issues I was seeing seem to be resolved.

When I first switched this snap to build from source, I couldn't
make the process succeed using the node snap, which led to a
rather more complicated method for obtaining and configuring
nodejs.

Taking another look, the issues I was seeing seem to be resolved.
@jnsgruk jnsgruk requested review from merlijn-sebrechts and soumyaDghosh and removed request for merlijn-sebrechts January 22, 2025 09:51
Copy link
Member

@soumyaDghosh soumyaDghosh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use the node plugin too?

@jnsgruk
Copy link
Member Author

jnsgruk commented Jan 23, 2025

No, too much complexity in how signal is put together with its different parts, and the patch we apply I think

@jnsgruk
Copy link
Member Author

jnsgruk commented Jan 23, 2025

Going to merge this, since it's a mechanical change which simplifies the build but makes no change to the end product.

@jnsgruk jnsgruk merged commit e62cdf6 into snapcrafters:candidate Jan 23, 2025
1 check passed
@jnsgruk jnsgruk deleted the node-snap branch January 23, 2025 10:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants