-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[feature] Restore CodeQL to doc-only commits #1261
Labels
Comments
ianlewis
added
type:feature
New feature or request
area:tooling
An issue with project tooling and config
labels
Nov 24, 2022
Related ossf/scorecard#2487 |
/cc @asraa |
Oof, I see. That's kinda unfortunate. At this point maybe it's OK since it's unlikely we'll have to move as quick on the doc-only changes. It'd be nice to see if the scorecard issue has any movement, but in the meantime, we can re-enable and see how annoying it gets? |
I think I'll just leave this issue open for now.
|
ianlewis
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 22, 2023
Fixes #1261 Run CodeQL on all PRs. CodeQL actions succeed even if there are errors so our noop setup didn't really work anyway. What we really need is the protected branch check that looks at the resulting "Checks" output that CodeQL uploads. Signed-off-by: Ian Lewis <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Currently we don't run CodeQL for PRs and commits that are only *.md or *.y(a)ml files. However, scorecard dings us for not running CodeQL on all of our commits.
Should we just run CodeQL on all of our commits so we can improve our scorecard score?
Related #547
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: