You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You can think of a map as a set of decisions. It's then possible to ask which maps are a subset or superset of another map. If map A is a subset of another map B i.e. every decision in B is also in A, then it's reasonable to conclude that A is a descendant of B, or in other words, A is an edit of B. That won't often be the case because some decisions replace other decisions in the set.
I'm sure biology literature has solved this and we can just borrow their techniques for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You can think of a map as a set of decisions. It's then possible to ask which maps are a subset or superset of another map. If map A is a subset of another map B i.e. every decision in B is also in A, then it's reasonable to conclude that A is a descendant of B, or in other words, A is an edit of B. That won't often be the case because some decisions replace other decisions in the set.
I'm sure biology literature has solved this and we can just borrow their techniques for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: