Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update unit test doc #2221

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update unit test doc #2221

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

usama9500
Copy link
Collaborator

@usama9500 usama9500 commented Jan 22, 2025

Added new section on properties panel and refined unit test documentation

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced BPMN Unit Tests guide with:
      • Clearer introduction explaining purpose and benefits
      • Detailed methods for creating unit tests
      • Comprehensive comparison of testing approaches
    • Improved guidance for validating BPMN process models

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation for BPMN Unit Tests has been comprehensively updated to provide a more detailed and structured guide for testing BPMN process models. The new content focuses on explaining the purpose and methods of creating unit tests, introducing two distinct approaches: using a test JSON file and utilizing the properties panel. The documentation now includes a more in-depth explanation of testing benefits, step-by-step implementation guidance, and a comparative overview of the testing methods.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/how_to_guides/building_diagrams/bpmn_unit_tests.md - Replaced general introduction with detailed explanation of BPMN Unit Tests
- Added comprehensive overview of testing benefits
- Introduced two methods for creating unit tests
- Expanded JSON test case example
- Created comparison table for testing methods

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant BPMN Model
    participant Test Framework
    
    User->>BPMN Model: Prepare Unit Test
    alt JSON File Method
        User->>Test Framework: Create test JSON
        Test Framework->>BPMN Model: Apply test configuration
    else Properties Panel Method
        User->>BPMN Model: Configure tests directly
        BPMN Model->>Test Framework: Generate test cases
    end
    
    Test Framework->>BPMN Model: Execute Unit Tests
    Test Framework-->>User: Provide Test Results
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@usama9500 usama9500 requested a review from burnettk January 22, 2025 12:38
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/how_to_guides/building_diagrams/bpmn_unit_tests.md (4)

9-9: Fix grammar in the introductory sentence.

Add the article "an" before "in-depth".

-Lets take a look at in-depth discussion on the two ways of creating BPMN Unit Tests: through a test JSON file and via the properties panel. 
+Let's take a look at an in-depth discussion on the two ways of creating BPMN Unit Tests: through a test JSON file and via the properties panel. 
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~9-~9: You might be missing the article “an” here.
Context: ...break the process. Lets take a look at in-depth discussion on the two ways of cre...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_AN)


52-58: Fix markdown list indentation.

The unordered list items should have consistent indentation with the parent content.

-**`test_case_1`**:
-  - Mocks a Service Task (`service_task_one`) output as `"mocked_service_result"`.
-  - Verifies that the process completes with the expected output: `"mocked_service_result"`.
+**`test_case_1`**:
+- Mocks a Service Task (`service_task_one`) output as `"mocked_service_result"`.
+- Verifies that the process completes with the expected output: `"mocked_service_result"`.

-**`test_case_2`**:
-  - Simulates a User Task (`user_task_1`) where the user enters `"user_input"`.
-  - Ensures the process captures this input correctly in the output.
+**`test_case_2`**:
+- Simulates a User Task (`user_task_1`) where the user enters `"user_input"`.
+- Ensures the process captures this input correctly in the output.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~52-~52: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... } } } ``` test_case_1: - Mocks a Service Task (`service_task...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ked_service_result". **test_case_2**: - Simulates a User Task (user_task_1...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

53-53: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


54-54: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


57-57: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


58-58: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


82-87: Fix markdown list indentation in example section.

The unordered list items should have consistent indentation with the parent content.

-**Task Details**:
-  - **Script Code:** `a = 1`.
+**Task Details**:
+- **Script Code:** `a = 1`.

-**Unit Test Configuration**:
-  - **Input JSON:** `{ "a": 2 }`
-  - **Expected Output JSON:** `{ "a": 2 }`
+**Unit Test Configuration**:
+- **Input JSON:** `{ "a": 2 }`
+- **Expected Output JSON:** `{ "a": 2 }`
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

83-83: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


86-86: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


87-87: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


100-100: Improve politeness in the conclusion.

Add "please" to make the request more polite.

-This documentation comprehensively explains both methods, their use cases, and how to implement them with practical examples. Let me know if further refinements are needed!
+This documentation comprehensively explains both methods, their use cases, and how to implement them with practical examples. Please let me know if further refinements are needed!
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~100-~100: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ...implement them with practical examples. Let me know if further refinements are needed!

(INSERT_PLEASE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3dd3525 and 00086d4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • docs/images/unit_test_properties_panel.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/how_to_guides/building_diagrams/bpmn_unit_tests.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/how_to_guides/building_diagrams/bpmn_unit_tests.md

[uncategorized] ~9-~9: You might be missing the article “an” here.
Context: ...break the process. Lets take a look at in-depth discussion on the two ways of cre...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_AN)


[uncategorized] ~52-~52: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... } } } ``` test_case_1: - Mocks a Service Task (`service_task...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ked_service_result". **test_case_2**: - Simulates a User Task (user_task_1...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[style] ~100-~100: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ...implement them with practical examples. Let me know if further refinements are needed!

(INSERT_PLEASE)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
docs/how_to_guides/building_diagrams/bpmn_unit_tests.md

53-53: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


54-54: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


57-57: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


58-58: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


83-83: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


86-86: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


87-87: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (13)
  • GitHub Check: typeguard 3.12 / ubuntu-latest sqlite
  • GitHub Check: typeguard 3.11 / ubuntu-latest sqlite
  • GitHub Check: tests 3.11 / macos-latest sqlite
  • GitHub Check: tests 3.10 / ubuntu-latest sqlite
  • GitHub Check: tests 3.12 / ubuntu-latest sqlite
  • GitHub Check: tests 3.11 / ubuntu-latest sqlite
  • GitHub Check: tests 3.12 / ubuntu-latest postgres
  • GitHub Check: tests 3.11 / ubuntu-latest postgres
  • GitHub Check: tests 3.12 / ubuntu-latest mysql
  • GitHub Check: tests 3.11 / ubuntu-latest mysql
  • GitHub Check: check_docker_start_script
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/how_to_guides/building_diagrams/bpmn_unit_tests.md (1)

1-100: Great job on the documentation update!

The documentation is well-structured and provides comprehensive guidance on BPMN Unit Testing. The addition of the properties panel section and the comparison table makes it easier for users to understand and choose between the two testing methods. The examples are clear and practical.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~9-~9: You might be missing the article “an” here.
Context: ...break the process. Lets take a look at in-depth discussion on the two ways of cre...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_AN)


[uncategorized] ~52-~52: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... } } } ``` test_case_1: - Mocks a Service Task (`service_task...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ked_service_result". **test_case_2**: - Simulates a User Task (user_task_1...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[style] ~100-~100: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it.
Context: ...implement them with practical examples. Let me know if further refinements are needed!

(INSERT_PLEASE)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

53-53: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


54-54: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


57-57: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


58-58: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


83-83: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


86-86: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


87-87: Expected: 0; Actual: 2
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant