Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DEVOPS-158] Implement required value(s) #71

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

yusufhm
Copy link
Contributor

@yusufhm yusufhm commented Feb 1, 2025

  • Adds support for regex matching a single string.
  • Implemented required values in the allowed:list plugin.

Basically examples/required-values.yml & examples/single-value-regex-match.yml are doing the same checks, although the former allows having a list of values and comparing against a list, while the latter only compares against a string. Depending on the use case, one of the other could be useful.

@sonnykt
Copy link
Member

sonnykt commented Feb 3, 2025

@yusufhm do we need to update the documentation too?

- Bubble up exit error.
- Return correct value in error when plugin is unsupported.
- Prevent duplicate error messages when input fact collection fails.
- Add error logging when docker command fails.
- Started a guide on connections.
- Added a connection example.
- Added stub pages for other sections.
- Added a file for analyse common fields.
- Started adding some details for `allowed:list`.
@yusufhm
Copy link
Contributor Author

yusufhm commented Feb 5, 2025

I've added some basic doco & stubs for some other pages so we can start having a structure around them. Since it's a bigger task than this PR, will just leave it at that for now and we can add more later.

@yusufhm yusufhm merged commit d043c52 into 1.x Feb 5, 2025
4 checks passed
@yusufhm yusufhm deleted the feature/DEVOPS-158-sdp-platform-rules branch February 5, 2025 22:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants