Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Add canonical address for unichain #950

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

akshay-ap
Copy link
Member

Provide the Chain ID (Only 1 chain id per PR).

  • Chain_ID: 130

@akshay-ap akshay-ap self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025
@akshay-ap akshay-ap requested review from gjeanmart and a team as code owners January 29, 2025 10:54
Copy link
Member

@remedcu remedcu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

{
  version: 'v1.4.1',
  chainId: '130',
  rpc: REDACTED,
  verbose: true
}
chain 130 exists on Chainlist
RPC reported chain 130
CompatibilityFallbackHandler deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
CreateCall deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
MultiSend deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
MultiSendCallOnly deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
Safe deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
SafeL2 deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
SafeMigration deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
SafeProxyFactory deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
SafeToL2Migration deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
SafeToL2Setup deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
SignMessageLib deployments:
• canonical deployment OK
SimulateTxAccessor deployments:
• canonical deployment OK

@remedcu remedcu merged commit 7a7a47a into main Jan 29, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@remedcu remedcu deleted the feature/unichain-v1.4.1-canonical-addresses branch January 29, 2025 11:28
@akshay-ap akshay-ap mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2025
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants