Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update decorators #1586
Update decorators #1586
Changes from all commits
f6f7d27
ba2f64b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is
setter
parameter being removed?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since it will not work to put in a function directly in the decorator since the class object has not yet been created. Therefore always the setter_name schould be used and the binding of the setter methods schould take place when the class object gets created.
I tried to use the setter parameter in my code directly in the decorator, but I could not get it to work (I think it will never work).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One way would be to give it a reference to a callable (like
DeviceClass.set_something
), and binding that to the instance object much like what is done for thesetter_name
one, no?`.But that is not important at the moment, let's however keep the code in place just in case for the time being.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that works since how would you get the instance object from the
DeviceClass.set_something
callable. But I am quite new to all these decorators, still figuring it all out a bit.Learning a lot from your coding skills!
Schould I just keep the setter parameter and add a Exception that it is not yet implemented instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, just add an exception there. I'm also learning, so it's all good :-)
I think something like this could work for the binding, but I haven't tried it out:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made the exception in a seperate PR.