Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable default features for
aws-lc-rs
#286Disable default features for
aws-lc-rs
#286Changes from all commits
c0e83b0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed the
?
because it didn't make sense, or was it there for a reason?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you're right that in this context it doesn't make sense and should be removed. My understanding of the
?
is that it (docs):But in this case, the
fips
feature is activatingaws_lc_rs
right alongsideaws-lc-rs/fips
.@djc Does that match your understanding? The usage came along with #234 and wasn't discussed explicitly as far as I can tell.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC there was a bug in older Cargo versions that needed the ? to be there. If it works without it on the project's MSRV, I'm fine with this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried it locally with Rust v1.66 and it compiles for me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"aws_lc_rs", "aws-lc-rs?/fips"
is the new way of writing"aws-lc-rs/fips"
and makes it explicit that the enabling theaws-lc-rs
feature is vital for thefips
feature.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case I don't think it makes sense to preserve the
?
, since we unconditionally enable the optional dependency anyway when thefips
feature is enabled.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. Since @est31 didn't request any changes and approved the PR I think it's fair to merge with the removal?