Use () instead of [u8; 0] in opaque type
#456
Merged
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
TadaHrd
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2024
JohnTitor
force-pushed
the
unit-in-opaque-type
branch
from
3401e89 to
38f5394
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There once was a comment in the opaque structs section of the FFI chapter which explained that the empty array is used to avoid a warning around
()in FFI. Since Rust 1.72, the compiler no longer warns about using()in FFI.This PR swaps
[u8; 0]for()in the example opaque structs to avoid any future confusion.