Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update to svd-rs 0.14.11 #908

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

update to svd-rs 0.14.11 #908

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

burrbull
Copy link
Member

@burrbull burrbull commented Feb 8, 2025

No description provided.

@burrbull burrbull requested a review from a team as a code owner February 8, 2025 10:42
@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

burrbull commented Feb 8, 2025

/ci diff pr

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Diff for comment

@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

burrbull commented Feb 8, 2025

cc @Emilgardis

@burrbull burrbull force-pushed the svd0410 branch 2 times, most recently from 1e9a431 to 63724af Compare February 10, 2025 17:43
@burrbull burrbull changed the title update to svd-rs 0.4.10 update to svd-rs 0.4.11 Feb 10, 2025
@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

cc @Emilgardis

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

commit msg is wrong

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

Still wrong, it mentions 10 but should be 11

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

Still says update to svd-rs 0.4.10 :3

@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

Where?

@burrbull burrbull changed the title update to svd-rs 0.4.11 update to svd-rs 0.14.11 Feb 11, 2025
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

the commit 9ae1dee message

@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed

@burrbull burrbull added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 12, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit e10f920 Feb 12, 2025
46 checks passed
@burrbull burrbull deleted the svd0410 branch February 12, 2025 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants