Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add date datatype #1906

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

MoumitaM
Copy link
Contributor

@MoumitaM MoumitaM commented Nov 1, 2024

PR Description

Allow date data type in apiObject interface.

Linear task (optional)

Linear task link

Cross Browser Tests

Please confirm you have tested for the following browsers:

  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • IE11

Sanity Suite

  • All sanity suite test cases pass locally

Security

  • The code changed/added as part of this pull request won't create any security issues with how the software is being used.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the ApiObject interface to support Date and null values, allowing for more complex data representations.

These changes improve the flexibility and capability of data handling within the application.

@MoumitaM MoumitaM requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2024 06:54
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve an update to the ApiObject interface in the types.ts file within the analytics-js-service-worker package. The index signature of ApiObject has been modified to include Date and null as allowable types, both as standalone types and within arrays. This modification enhances the interface's capability to represent more complex data structures by allowing date values and null entries.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/analytics-js-service-worker/src/types.ts Updated the ApiObject interface to include Date and null as allowable types in the index signature.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant ApiObject

    Client->>ApiObject: Create new ApiObject
    ApiObject->>ApiObject: Add properties (including Date and null)
    Client->>ApiObject: Retrieve ApiObject
    ApiObject-->>Client: Return ApiObject with Date and null properties
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1312e7 and 413356b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/analytics-js-service-worker/src/types.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/analytics-js-service-worker/src/types.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.47%. Comparing base (b71c44a) to head (413356b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1906   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    57.47%   57.47%           
========================================
  Files          485      485           
  Lines        16495    16495           
  Branches      3304     3313    +9     
========================================
  Hits          9481     9481           
+ Misses        5745     5734   -11     
- Partials      1269     1280   +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/analytics-js-service-worker/src/types.ts (2)

Line range hint 3-7: Update interface documentation to include Date type.

The interface documentation should be updated to mention Date type support and include usage examples.

 /**
  * Represents a generic object in the APIs
  * Use for parameters like context, traits etc.
+ *
+ * @example
+ * {
+ *   createdAt: new Date(),
+ *   dates: [new Date('2023-01-01'), new Date('2023-12-31')]
+ * }
  */

15-16: Consider adding runtime type validation.

Since ApiObject can now include Date objects, consider adding runtime type validation to ensure proper Date object handling and prevent invalid date values.

This could be implemented as a utility function:

function isValidDateValue(value: unknown): boolean {
  return value instanceof Date && !isNaN(value.getTime());
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b71c44a and db0325e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/analytics-js-service-worker/src/types.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/analytics-js-service-worker/src/types.ts (2)

15-16: LGTM! Non-breaking type enhancement.

The addition of the Date type is a valid enhancement that maintains backward compatibility.


15-16: Verify Date object handling across browsers.

Since this PR introduces Date object support and cross-browser testing is required, ensure proper Date object serialization and handling, especially for IE11 compatibility.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about Date handling in the service worker context and the analytics package.


Date handling is properly implemented and cross-browser compatible

The codebase shows robust Date object handling:

  • Uses standard toISOString() for serialization in the service worker
  • Implements proper timestamp formatting utilities in analytics-js-common
  • Handles Date objects consistently across all analytics operations
  • No IE11-specific code is needed as IE11 is no longer supported by modern browsers and service workers

The implementation is safe and follows best practices for Date handling in a service worker context.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Date object handling and serialization in the codebase
echo "Checking for Date object serialization..."
rg -l "JSON\.stringify.*Date|new Date\(" 

echo "Checking for browser-specific Date handling..."
rg -l "toISOString|getTime|toJSON.*Date"

Length of output: 5374


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how Date objects are handled in the service worker and analytics packages
echo "Checking service worker Date handling..."
rg -A 5 "Date" packages/analytics-js-service-worker/

echo "Checking analytics common utilities Date handling..."
rg -A 5 "Date" packages/analytics-js-common/src/utilities/

Length of output: 15707

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 1, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2024

size-limit report 📦

Name Size (Base) Size (Current) Size Limit Status
Plugins Module Federation Mapping - Legacy - CDN 332 B 332 B (0%) 512 B
Plugins - Legacy - CDN 15.48 KB 15.48 KB (0%) 16 KB
Plugins Module Federation Mapping - Modern - CDN 331 B 331 B (0%) 512 B
Plugins - Modern - CDN 7.2 KB 7.2 KB (0%) 7.5 KB
Common - No bundling 16.21 KB 16.27 KB (+0.36% ▲) 16.5 KB
Cookies Utils - Legacy - NPM (ESM) 1.45 KB 1.45 KB (0%) 2 KB
Cookies Utils - Legacy - NPM (CJS) 1.65 KB 1.65 KB (0%) 2 KB
Cookies Utils - Legacy - NPM (UMD) 1.43 KB 1.43 KB (0%) 2 KB
Cookies Utils - Modern - NPM (ESM) 1.11 KB 1.11 KB (0%) 1.5 KB
Cookies Utils - Modern - NPM (CJS) 1.34 KB 1.34 KB (0%) 1.5 KB
Cookies Utils - Modern - NPM (UMD) 1.08 KB 1.08 KB (0%) 1.5 KB
Load Snippet 758 B 758 B (0%) 1 KB
Core (v1.1) - NPM (ESM) 30.36 KB 30.36 KB (0%) 32 KB
Core (v1.1) - NPM (CJS) 30.55 KB 30.55 KB (0%) 32 KB
Core (v1.1) - NPM (UMD) 30.37 KB 30.37 KB (0%) 32 KB
Core (Content Script - v1.1) - NPM (ESM) 29.89 KB 29.89 KB (0%) 30.5 KB
Core (Content Script - v1.1) - NPM (CJS) 30.09 KB 30.09 KB (0%) 30.5 KB
Core (Content Script - v1.1) - NPM (UMD) 29.92 KB 29.92 KB (0%) 30 KB
Core - Legacy - CDN 48.33 KB 48.33 KB (0%) 48.5 KB
Core - Modern - CDN 24.75 KB 24.75 KB (0%) 25 KB
Core - Legacy - NPM (ESM) 48.24 KB 48.24 KB (0%) 48.5 KB
Core - Legacy - NPM (CJS) 48.46 KB 48.46 KB (0%) 49 KB
Core - Legacy - NPM (UMD) 48.19 KB 48.19 KB (0%) 48.5 KB
Core - Modern - NPM (ESM) 24.48 KB 24.48 KB (0%) 25 KB
Core - Modern - NPM (CJS) 24.72 KB 24.72 KB (0%) 25 KB
Core - Modern - NPM (UMD) 24.53 KB 24.53 KB (0%) 25 KB
Core (Bundled) - Legacy - NPM (ESM) 48.24 KB 48.24 KB (0%) 48.5 KB
Core (Bundled) - Legacy - NPM (CJS) 48.44 KB 48.44 KB (0%) 49 KB
Core (Bundled) - Legacy - NPM (UMD) 48.19 KB 48.19 KB (0%) 48.5 KB
Core (Bundled) - Modern - NPM (ESM) 39.34 KB 39.34 KB (0%) 39.5 KB
Core (Bundled) - Modern - NPM (CJS) 39.6 KB 39.6 KB (0%) 40 KB
Core (Bundled) - Modern - NPM (UMD) 39.29 KB 39.29 KB (0%) 39.5 KB
Core (Content Script) - Legacy - NPM (ESM) 47.61 KB 47.61 KB (0%) 48 KB
Core (Content Script) - Legacy - NPM (CJS) 47.89 KB 47.89 KB (0%) 48 KB
Core (Content Script) - Legacy - NPM (UMD) 47.62 KB 47.62 KB (0%) 48 KB
Core (Content Script) - Modern - NPM (ESM) 38.84 KB 38.84 KB (0%) 39 KB
Core (Content Script) - Modern - NPM (CJS) 39.05 KB 39.05 KB (0%) 40 KB
Core (Content Script) - Modern - NPM (UMD) 38.76 KB 38.76 KB (0%) 39 KB
Service Worker - Legacy - NPM (ESM) 30.6 KB 30.6 KB (0%) 31 KB
Service Worker - Legacy - NPM (CJS) 30.88 KB 30.88 KB (0%) 31 KB
Service Worker - Legacy - NPM (UMD) 30.68 KB 30.68 KB (0%) 31 KB
Service Worker - Modern - NPM (ESM) 25.74 KB 25.74 KB (0%) 26 KB
Service Worker - Modern - NPM (CJS) 26.02 KB 26.02 KB (0%) 26.5 KB
Service Worker - Modern - NPM (UMD) 25.79 KB 25.79 KB (0%) 26 KB
All Integrations - Legacy - CDN 94.68 KB 94.68 KB (0%) 95.3 KB
All Integrations - Modern - CDN 89.82 KB 89.82 KB (0%) 91 KB

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 4, 2024

@MoumitaM MoumitaM merged commit 9c207f1 into develop Nov 4, 2024
12 checks passed
@MoumitaM MoumitaM deleted the feat/SDK-2558-add-date-datatype-serviceworker-sdk branch November 4, 2024 07:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants