-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "Revert "adding API change for spin_until_complete"" #3334
Conversation
This shouldn't be a draft. Its ready to go with the feature merges |
@audrow please revert this. (edit, i mean merge this PR, sorry for the confusion.) |
Rename ``spin_until_future_complete`` to ``spin_until_complete`` | ||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ||
|
||
`PR 1874 <https://github.com/ros2/rclcpp/pull/1874>`_ renames ``spin_until_future_complete`` to ``spin_until_complete`` to represent the semantics of being able to spin on values that are not exclusively futures. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@SteveMacenski, should we mention ros2/rclcpp#1957 here instead?
Seeing that ros2/rclcpp#1874 was merged is what made me think this was ready to merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the "revert revert" language in 1957 makes it less clear to a user. I'd think 1874 is a better link to understand the change, but I don't feel overly strong about it
Now I'm confused -- so you want this merged now @fujitatomoya ? |
Oh sorry, i was the one who got confused. |
I've opened #4252 to replace this PR. Closing. |
Reverts #3333, which originally reverted #3328.