Simplifications in wording

onstage_rules/rules.adoc

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ All RoboCupJunior OnStage Teams must also comply with the RoboCupJunior General
 {++Teams should inform the judges if robotic components have been featured in previous competitions. To gain marks, teams should be prepared to provide insight on how substantial changes have been made between competitions as evidence of the students’ continuing development of the technologies. Teams should specify how innovations have been done with their technologies and provide documentation to support their claims.++}
 
 [[onstage-performance]]
-== OnStage Performance (40% of total score)
+== Performance (40% of total score)
 
 The OnStage Performance is an opportunity to demonstrate the design, construction, and technical aspects of the robot(s) through a performance or stage show. For example, this could be a magic show, theater performance, story, comedy show, dance, or art installation. Teams are encouraged to be creative, innovative and take risks in their use of technology and materials when creating their performances. 
 
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ To protect participants and comply with occupational health and safety regulatio
 A team whose routine includes any situation that could be deemed hazardous, including the possibility of damaging the stage, must submit a report outlining the content of their performance to the committee two weeks before the competition. The Committee may also request further explanation and a demonstration of the activity before the stage performance. Teams not conforming to this rule may not be allowed to present their routine.
 
 [[onstage-technical-interview]]
-== OnStage Technical Interview (30% of total score)
+== Technical Interview (30% of total score)
 
 The Technical Interview is a live interview between the team and the judges, in which all robots and programming are judged against technical criteria. Creative and innovative technical features chosen by the team will be rewarded with higher scores. Judges are interested in determining students' understanding of the robotic technologies they have used. Teams must show authenticity and originality regarding their robots and performance in this interview. {--Teams should inform the judges if robotic components have been featured in previous competitions. To gain marks, teams should be prepared to provide insight on how substantial changes have been made between competitions as evidence of the students’ continuing development of the technologies. Teams should specify how innovations have been done with their technologies and provide documentation to support their claims.--}