Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Part06Request. Task specification clarified. Typos. #70

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Part06Request. Task specification clarified. Typos. #70

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

senleft
Copy link

@senleft senleft commented Dec 23, 2019

If PR will accepted it also may be applied to 'solution' branch

simonbasle
simonbasle approved these changes Jan 6, 2020
@@ -17,14 +17,14 @@

//========================================================================================

// TODO Create a StepVerifier that initially requests all values and expect 4 values to be received
// TODO Create a StepVerifier that expects 4 values to be received and requests all remaining values
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is not a good change. the initially requests all values part is important, as a duality to initially requests 1 value in the next test.

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ StepVerifier requestOneExpectSkylerThenRequestOneExpectJesse(Flux<User> flux) {

//========================================================================================

// TODO Return a Flux with all users stored in the repository that prints "Starring:" on subscribe, "firstname lastname" for all values and "The end!" on complete
// TODO Return a Flux with all users stored in the repository that prints "Starting:" on subscribe, "firstname lastname" for all values and "The end!" on complete
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not a typo: Starring, as "a movie starring user1, user2, user3, ..." (see the solution branch). That said, the associated test doesn't check the console output, so it is not terribly meaningful.

StepVerifier requestAllExpectFour(Flux<User> flux) {
return null;
}

//========================================================================================

// TODO Create a StepVerifier that initially requests 1 value and expects User.SKYLER then requests another value and expects User.JESSE.
// TODO Create a StepVerifier that initially requests 1 value and expects User.SKYLER then requests another value and expects User.JESSE then stops request.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could be made even more explicit by stating "then stops verifying by cancelling the source"

@simonbasle simonbasle self-requested a review January 6, 2020 11:17
Copy link
Contributor

@simonbasle simonbasle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 changes are not relevant. instructions for the middle one can be even further improved 👍

@simonbasle
Copy link
Contributor

closing this has review comments have never been addressed

@simonbasle simonbasle closed this Feb 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants