You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Purpose: Tests the effect of outdoor temperature changes on heating and cooling demands.
Test-load: 4 scenario's. based on the old nl 2050 scenario.
Run-time (local): 0:46
Category: Slidertest, 1 slider.
Effective: Small scope
Action: Review if this is still an aspect of the model we want to review.
2. biomass_spec
Purpose: Ensures balanced input/output flows for biomass.
should this be added to that scenario? It's fine to still keep this test.
Scenario-load: 2 scenario runs. 1 based on the old nl 2050 scenario and 1 on an nvdt scenario.
Run-time (local): 4:18
Category: Balancing test.
Effective: Tests the entirety of the biomass sankey, but could be written more efficiently.
Action: Review usage scenarios(the nvdt scenario could be changed In addition, we have added propane to the gasmix, this could also be implemented in the test). Finally, this could be set-up more efficient.
3. hybrid_heatpump_spec
Purpose: Tests various scenarios involving hybrid heat pumps.
Scenario's: 4 scenario runs, each based on the NL 2050 scenario.
Run-time (local): 0:25
Category: Slidertest
Effective: Small scope
Action: Review usage scenarios; heavily based on old scenario settings. Hybrid heat pumps do have some issues, so the test should be updated.
4. hydrogen_spec
Purpose: Checks supply/demand balance for hydrogen.
Scenario's : 14 scenarios in the preset collection.
Run-time (local): 2:05
Category: Balancing-test
Effective: Yes, but requires careful consideration of used scenario's.
Action: review scenario usage and check wether the commented tests can be used again.
5. lng_spec
Purpose: Focuses on LNG scenarios and infrastructure.
Scenario's: 2 scenarios, of which one is not used.
Run-time (local): 0:03
Category: Slidertest
Effective: Small scope
Action: Review relevance, and review the scenario that is used.
6. number_of_residences_spec
Purpose: Tests housing-related scenarios.
Scenario's: 5 scenarios
Run-time (local): 0:37
Category: Slidertest
Effective: Yes
Action: Review relevance, and review used scenario.
7. population_spec
Purpose: Checks working of population slider.
Scenario's: 1 scenario
Run-time (local): 0:23
Category: Slidertest
Effective: Yes
Action: Review relevance, and review used scenario.
8. primary_demand_spec
Purpose: Validates primary demand data.
Scenario's:: 14 scenarios in the preset collection.
Run-time (local): 2:26
Category: Balancing test
Effective: Yes, but requires careful consideration of scenarios used.
Action: Resolve issues with skipped tests, check wether these are resolved. Check relevance & used scenarios.
9. transport_spec
Purpose: Checks working of population slider.
Scenario's:: 1 basic nl to 2050 scenario.
Run-time (local): 0:06
Category: Slidertest
Effective: Small scope
Action: Review the used scenario. Review the skipped tests. Review tests, seem quite random.
10. washing_on_low_temperature_spec
Purpose: Analyzes the working of the 'washing on low temperatures' slider
Scenario's: 1 basic NL to 2050 scenario.
Run-time (local): 0:11
Category: Slidertest
Effective: Small scope, not really effective
Action: Replace with updated test.
11. emissions_electricity_spec
Purpose: Ensures consistency in emissions calculations.
Scenario's: 2 scenario's (ii3050, nvdt)
Run-time (local): 1:42
Category: Balanstest
Effective: Not sure yet. Needs more
Action: Keep. Review used scenario's.
12. flexibility_spec
Purpose: Tests flexibility options.
Scenario's: 7 scens are created. 1 is not used?
Run-time (local): 2:02
Category: Slidertest
Effective: Ineffective
Action: Activate Work In Progress section if needed. Check why tests are skipped. Why is one scenario created in the start of the script?
13. power_to_gas_spec
Purpose: Validates electricity mix for Power-to-Gas.
Scenario's: 14 scenarios in the preset collection.
Run-time (local): 1:51
Category: Balance test
Effective: Yes, but requires careful consideration of scenarios used.
Action: Check the tested scenario's.
14. chemical_industry_spec
Purpose: Analyzes scenarios related to the chemical industry.
Scenario's: 1 scenario is used, NL to 2050.
Run-time (local): 1:09
Category: Slidertest
Effective: Average
Action: Check issue concering test.
15. metal_spec
Purpose: Tests various scenarios for metal production.
Scenario's: 1 scenario is used, NL to 2050.
Run-time (local): 2:25
Category: Slidertests
Effective: Not entirely effectively written, but interesting.
Action: Check whether it still makes sense. It is a big test. Mathis might know more?
16. lole_spec
Purpose: Analyzes LOLE under different settings.
Scenario's: 1 scenario, nl to 2050.
Category: Dashboard item based on slidertests.
Effective: Not really, decreasing population does not necessarily lead to less LOLE.
Action: Check relevance.
17. merit_order_spec
Purpose: Tests the impact of merit order on electricity production.
Action: Very old test, this does not test anything?
Test-load:1 scenario nl to 2040?
General remarks:
Need to make a choice about which scenario's to use.
Is 'nl' sufficient?
Is the scenario creation we use efficient?
How do we view the scenario's that are used in the testing?
Some scenario's use a basis scenario in which the merit order is turned off, is this the same as the merit_order_off scenario?
Check if an update in a test is seen as a new scenario, and how we can efficiently set up our test-suite.
Scenario_collection:
II3050 V2
IP
DfE
TYNDP
Regional scenario's.
Open issues for tests:
[Storage should get more specs] (Storage should get more specs #88)
Necessity: Low
Scenario's: If implemented, the whole scenario collection.
[Create mechanical turk test for energy flow sankeys] (Create mechanical turk test for energy flow sankeys #122)
Necessity: High, should be done for all of the supply and demand graphs.
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
[Run specs for random scenarios] (Run specs for random scenarios #145)
Necessity: Low, I don't know if this is necessary. If we built a nice scenario collection, we don't have to make this I think.
1. climate_spec
2. biomass_spec
should this be added to that scenario? It's fine to still keep this test.
Action: Review usage scenarios(the nvdt scenario could be changed In addition, we have added propane to the gasmix, this could also be implemented in the test). Finally, this could be set-up more efficient.
3. hybrid_heatpump_spec
4. hydrogen_spec
5. lng_spec
6. number_of_residences_spec
7. population_spec
8. primary_demand_spec
9. transport_spec
10. washing_on_low_temperature_spec
11. emissions_electricity_spec
12. flexibility_spec
13. power_to_gas_spec
14. chemical_industry_spec
15. metal_spec
16. lole_spec
17. merit_order_spec
18. network_infrastructure_investments_spec
19. ** start_situation_spec**
General remarks:
Scenario_collection:
Open issues for tests:
Necessity: Low
Scenario's: If implemented, the whole scenario collection.
Necessity: High, should be done for all of the supply and demand graphs.
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
Necessity: Low, I don't know if this is necessary. If we built a nice scenario collection, we don't have to make this I think.
Necessity: High
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
Necessity: High
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
Necessity: Not sure, might need coupling with molecule graph.
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
Necessity: High
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
Necessity: High
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
Necessity: High
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
Necessity: High
Scenario's: Whole scenario collection.
Necessity: Average
Scenario's: Coupled scenario's within the scenario collection.
Necessity: High
Necessity: High
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: