Totally just added the dirt shulker box #121
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Totally useful for dispenser placing of specific stacks of items for a specific redstone signal!
Probably need to rework the recipe (possibly just a dirt block inside two shukler shells) as you can "upgrade" a shulker box to a dirt variant and it loses any items in it except for the first stack, also, because of the utility (redstone circuits), you can store a single stack of anything, eggs make a nice almost 1->1 output of the right comparator signal
So, while watching redstone videos i realized that people have to have chests with many stacks of items to get a specific redstone output, and looked at your fine Dirt Chest 9000!, and saw that it actually works well with the comparator (all your chests do!)
I was ecstatic, so decided to implement a dirt shulker box, which is effectively a single stack shulker box, which outputs a nice comparator value for the single stack of items in the chest, which means you can almost select a redstone output with a stack of eggs (only stacks to 16)
See the album: https://imgur.com/a/n4Pwu
I'd love your thoughts (other than the complete waste of shulker shells) it's awesome