Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Do not review] test doc-only CI workflow #24539

Closed

Conversation

steveburnett
Copy link
Contributor

Description

DO NOT REVIEW. This is a doc-only PR to test the doc-only PR CI workflow. It will be deleted when it is no longer needed and will never need to be reviewed, approved, or merged.

Contributor checklist

  • Please make sure your submission complies with our contributing guide, in particular code style and commit standards.
  • PR description addresses the issue accurately and concisely. If the change is non-trivial, a GitHub Issue is referenced.
  • Documented new properties (with its default value), SQL syntax, functions, or other functionality.
  • If release notes are required, they follow the release notes guidelines.
  • Adequate tests were added if applicable.
  • CI passed.

Release Notes

== NO RELEASE NOTE ==

@steveburnett steveburnett requested review from elharo and a team as code owners February 12, 2025 15:06
@prestodb-ci prestodb-ci added the from:IBM PR from IBM label Feb 12, 2025
@prestodb-ci prestodb-ci requested review from a team, ScrapCodes and zuyu and removed request for a team February 12, 2025 15:06
@steveburnett steveburnett self-assigned this Feb 12, 2025
@steveburnett
Copy link
Contributor Author

The new PR did not follow the doc-only PR CI workflow and ran code-related tests.

I see that there are commits in my PR that should not be there, that I did not create, and that are code changes from other's PRs - which explains why the doc-only PR did not follow the doc-only CI workflow. I don't know how those code commits are in my PR, but because they're in it this PR isn't useful to test the doc-only PR CI workflow. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
from:IBM PR from IBM
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants