Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pd: add no-op migration for APP_VERSION 10 #5074

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

conorsch
Copy link
Contributor

@conorsch conorsch commented Feb 7, 2025

Describe your changes

Follow-up to #5073, which should have included a no-op migration.

Issue ticket number and link

Towards #5010.

Testing and review

This work will be used to perform a chain upgrade on the PL testnet. Once that's done, we should expect CI to pass fully on this PR, in particular the "testnet-integration" suite.

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test these changes.

  • If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason:

    provides migration logic for proposed protocol-breaking changes

@conorsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

conorsch commented Feb 7, 2025

The no-op migration is necessary but not yet sufficient: I am indeed encountering the version mismatch logic anticipated in #5073 (comment). Working with a pre-upgrade backup of node state to test changes, will append a patch here and mark RFR when done.

@conorsch conorsch requested a review from cronokirby February 7, 2025 19:19
Follow-up to #5073, which should have included a no-op migration.
@conorsch conorsch force-pushed the fix-lqt-version-recognition branch from b254713 to 1e7537e Compare February 7, 2025 19:20
@conorsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

conorsch commented Feb 7, 2025

The no-op migration is necessary but not yet sufficient

In the first draft of this PR, I'd neglected to update the default migration used by pd migrate to be the new mainnet3 no-op migration. That's done now, and this patch was used to finalize the upgrade on the PL testnet. The testnet has resumed, as evidenced by the testnet-integration CI tests passing.

@conorsch conorsch marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 20:40
@conorsch conorsch added the consensus-breaking breaking change to execution of on-chain data label Feb 7, 2025
@conorsch conorsch merged commit 7ab4df9 into protocol/lqt_branch Feb 7, 2025
11 checks passed
@conorsch conorsch deleted the fix-lqt-version-recognition branch February 7, 2025 21:18
conorsch added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
## Describe your changes

Follow-up to #5073, which should have included a no-op migration.

## Issue ticket number and link

Towards #5010. 

## Testing and review

This work will be used to perform a chain upgrade on the PL testnet.
Once that's done, we should expect CI to pass fully on this PR, in
particular the "testnet-integration" suite.

## Checklist before requesting a review

- [x] I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test
these changes.

- [x] If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the
"consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there
are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason:

  > provides migration logic for proposed protocol-breaking changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
consensus-breaking breaking change to execution of on-chain data
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants