Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): Bump PF deps to latest prerelease #68

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2023

Conversation

wise-king-sullyman
Copy link
Contributor

@wise-king-sullyman wise-king-sullyman commented Jun 12, 2023

What

Towards #55

Description

Bumps PF dependencies towards PF v5 release adoption.

Type of change

  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Other (please describe): Dependency bumps

Screen shots / Gifs for design review

@jenny-s51 jenny-s51 self-requested a review June 13, 2023 13:22
Copy link
Collaborator

@jenny-s51 jenny-s51 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code, demos, and docs LGTM

Copy link
Member

@jeff-phillips-18 jeff-phillips-18 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is good for now. We should try to remove the deprecated component usage in examples as soon as possible.

@wise-king-sullyman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Created #69 as a followup for the deprecated components.

@wise-king-sullyman wise-king-sullyman merged commit 2336b11 into v5 Jun 20, 2023
@wise-king-sullyman wise-king-sullyman deleted the bump-pf-deps branch June 20, 2023 13:44
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.0-alpha.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.0-prerelease.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants