CL: Speedup TickToPrice by only doing one bigint operation

[ValarDragon]

This is on the way to #7580 , by first introducing a function which just returns the geometric and additive tick spacings, and then changes the PriceToTick algorithm to use this + optimize out one multiplication.

In a subsequent PR, I'll take a stab at state compatibly speeding up TickToSqrtPrice.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Enhanced the price calculation logic in the trading platform to improve accuracy and performance.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update involves refactoring the TickToPrice function in tick.go for more efficient price calculations using a combination of additive and geometric indices. A new auxiliary function, TickToAdditiveGeometricIndices, has been introduced to streamline this process.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.../math/tick.go	Refactored TickToPrice to use additive and geometric indices; added TickToAdditiveGeometricIndices.

Possibly related issues

• [Feature]: Speedup CL sqrt price function #7580: The refactoring could potentially optimize the TickToSqrtPrice function by reducing computational overhead, aligning with the issue's objective to speed up price calculations.
• [Feature]: Make a local hashmap cache for TickToSqrtPrice #8015: Although this PR does not directly implement caching, the efficiency improvements in tick price calculations might indirectly support the goals of reducing computation time mentioned in the issue.

Poem

🐰 Oh hoppity hop, in the code we dive deep,
Refactoring ticks, making prices not steep.
With indices new, our functions do leap,
🌟 In the land of the ticks, efficiency we reap!
Celebrate we do, with a carrot so sweet,
For code that's more swift, is quite the feat! 🥕

---

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc97ed0 and 033d431.

Files selected for processing (1)

• x/concentrated-liquidity/math/tick.go (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (2)

x/concentrated-liquidity/math/tick.go (2)

79-101: Refactor TickToPrice to use precomputed indices from TickToAdditiveGeometricIndices.

Ensure that the logic for calculating unscaledPrice and price is thoroughly tested, especially the handling of negative tick indices and boundary conditions.

Verification successful

The verification process has identified that there is a test file named tick_test.go in the x/concentrated-liquidity/math directory which contains tests related to the TickToPrice function. This suggests that the new logic introduced in the TickToPrice function might be covered by tests in this file. However, to confirm the adequacy of these tests, especially in terms of the new logic handling negative tick indices and boundary conditions, we need to inspect the contents of these tests.

To proceed, I will generate a script to extract the contents of the test functions related to TickToPrice from the tick_test.go file. This will help us verify if the tests adequately cover the new logic implemented in the TickToPrice function.

---

The attempt to extract the contents of test functions related to TickToPrice from the tick_test.go file resulted in a regex parse error due to an unclosed counted repetition in the regex pattern. This error prevented us from obtaining the necessary information to verify the adequacy of the tests covering the new logic in the TickToPrice function.

To correct this and successfully retrieve the test function contents, I will generate a new script with a corrected regex pattern. This will allow us to inspect the test functions and ensure they adequately cover the new logic, particularly the handling of negative tick indices and boundary conditions.

---

The corrected script has successfully identified two test functions in the tick_test.go file: TestTickToPrice_SuccessCases and TestTickToPrice_ErrorCases. This indicates that there are dedicated tests for both successful scenarios and error handling within the TickToPrice function. However, to fully verify the adequacy of these tests in covering the new logic, particularly the handling of negative tick indices and boundary conditions, we need to inspect the actual contents of these test cases.

To proceed, I will generate a script to extract the detailed contents of these test functions. This will allow us to assess whether the tests effectively cover the new logic implemented in the TickToPrice function.

---

The detailed contents of the test functions TestTickToPrice_SuccessCases and TestTickToPrice_ErrorCases have been successfully retrieved. The tests cover various scenarios:

1. Success Cases:

   • Tests for maximum tick index, a specific tick index between minimum and maximum, and specific minimum tick indices. These tests check if the function returns the expected price without errors.
   • The scenarios include boundary conditions like maximum tick and minimum initialized tick, which are crucial for ensuring the function handles edge cases correctly.

2. Error Cases:

   • Tests for tick indices beyond the allowable range (greater than max tick and less than min tick). These tests ensure that the function correctly handles and returns errors for invalid tick indices.

From the extracted test cases, it appears that the tests are designed to cover both normal operation scenarios and boundary conditions, including error handling. This should adequately test the new logic in the TickToPrice function, particularly the handling of negative tick indices and boundary conditions as implemented in the recent changes.

Given this information, the tests seem to be comprehensive in terms of the new logic introduced in the TickToPrice function. Therefore, the initial review comment suggesting to ensure thorough testing of the new logic, especially for negative tick indices and boundary conditions, can be considered addressed by the existing tests.

Conclusion:
The logic for calculating unscaledPrice and price in the TickToPrice function, including the handling of negative tick indices and boundary conditions, appears to be thoroughly tested based on the provided test cases.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for tests related to TickToPrice to ensure coverage of new logic.
rg --type go 'func TestTickToPrice' --files-with-matches

Length of output: 101

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the contents of test functions related to TickToPrice from tick_test.go
cat x/concentrated-liquidity/math/tick_test.go | rg 'func TestTickToPrice.*{'

Length of output: 189

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Corrected script to extract the contents of test functions related to TickToPrice from tick_test.go
cat x/concentrated-liquidity/math/tick_test.go | rg --multiline 'func TestTickToPrice.*\{'

Length of output: 190

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract detailed contents of the test functions related to TickToPrice from tick_test.go
cat x/concentrated-liquidity/math/tick_test.go | rg --multiline 'func TestTickToPrice.*\{' -A 20

Length of output: 1389

---

111-139: Introduce TickToAdditiveGeometricIndices to compute indices for tick calculations.

Consider adding detailed comments explaining the calculations, especially how geometricExponentDelta and numAdditiveTicks are derived from tickIndex.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.