feat(theme/baseVariable): change base variable and common variable #926
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a series of changes across multiple Vue components and CSS files, primarily focusing on updating styling and theming elements. Key modifications include adjustments to hover effects, background colors, and the organization of CSS variables to align with a new design system. The functionality of the components remains largely unchanged, with no alterations to exported entities. Overall, the changes aim to enhance visual consistency and responsiveness throughout the application. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
packages/canvas/layout/src/CanvasLayout.vue (1)
Line range hint
31-31: Consider updating the remaining legacy variable.The
.site-canvasbackground still uses--ti-lowcode-breadcrumb-hover-bg, which:
- Uses the old
--ti-prefix instead of the new--te-prefix- Seems to be using a breadcrumb-specific variable for canvas background, which might not be semantically correct
Consider updating to an appropriate common background variable from the new theme system, for example:
- background: var(--ti-lowcode-breadcrumb-hover-bg); + background: var(--te-common-bg-container-hover); // or another appropriate common variabledesigner-demo/src/configurators/MyInputConfigurator.vue (3)
Line range hint
31-34: Add validation for thedataTypepropThe
dataTypeprop is used for type conversion but lacks validation. Consider adding allowed values to prevent unexpected behavior.dataType: { type: String, + validator: (value) => ['Array', 'String'].includes(value) },
Line range hint
42-44: Add error handling in thechangefunctionThe current implementation assumes valid input for array conversion. Consider adding validation and error handling.
const change = (val) => { + if (!val && props.dataType === 'Array') { + emit('update:modelValue', []) + return + } emit('update:modelValue', props.dataType === 'Array' ? val.split(',') : val) }
Remove unused
suffixIconspropThe
suffixIconsprop is defined but not utilized in the template ofMyInputConfigurator.vue. While this prop is actively used inInputConfigurator.vuefor rendering suffix icons, theMyInputConfiguratorcomponent doesn't implement this functionality in its template. Consider removing this unused prop to maintain clean and maintainable code.
- Remove the
suffixIconsprop definition fromdesigner-demo/src/configurators/MyInputConfigurator.vue- If suffix icons functionality is needed, implement the template similar to
InputConfigurator.vue🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
19-37: Verify the usage of thesuffixIconspropThe
suffixIconsprop is defined but not utilized in the template. This could indicate incomplete implementation or unnecessary code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of suffixIcons in the codebase rg -l "suffixIcons" --type vueLength of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of suffixIcons in all files rg "suffixIcons" # Also search for the component name to understand its usage rg "MyInputConfigurator"Length of output: 999
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of InputConfigurator.vue to understand how suffixIcons is used cat packages/configurator/src/input-configurator/InputConfigurator.vue # Also check if MyInputConfigurator extends or relates to InputConfigurator rg -A 5 -B 5 "extends.*InputConfigurator" rg -A 5 -B 5 "import.*InputConfigurator"Length of output: 4855
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of MyInputConfigurator.vue to see if it's extending InputConfigurator cat designer-demo/src/configurators/MyInputConfigurator.vue # Also check the template version cat packages/engine-cli/template/designer/src/configurators/MyInputConfigurator.vueLength of output: 2399
packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasAction.vue (6)
Line range hint
15-19: Optimize conditional rendering of popover componentsThe
v-if="showPopover"condition is redundant since TinyPopover already handles visibility through v-model. Remove the inner v-if to improve performance and reduce unnecessary DOM updates.<TinyPopover v-model="showPopover" placement="top-start" title="快捷设置" width="310" popper-class="short-cut-set" trigger="manual" > - <shortCutPopover v-if="showPopover" @active="activeSetting('props')"></shortCutPopover> + <shortCutPopover @active="activeSetting('props')"></shortCutPopover> <template #reference> <icon-setting class="icon-setting" @click.stop="showPopover = !showPopover"></icon-setting> </template> </TinyPopover>
Line range hint
252-270: Improve parent class checking implementationThe current implementation of
findParentHasClasshas several issues:
- Inefficient recursive DOM traversal
- Unsafe className handling using JSON.stringify
- Potential infinite loop without proper termination condition
Consider this safer and more efficient implementation:
- const findParentHasClass = (target) => { - let parent = target.parentNode - let flag = false - - if (parent.className === undefined) { - return false - } - - let name = JSON.stringify(parent.className) - - if (name && name.indexOf('short-cut-set') === -1 && name.indexOf('tiny-dialog-box') === -1) { - flag = findParentHasClass(parent) - } else { - flag = true - } - - return flag - } + const findParentHasClass = (target) => { + const targetClasses = ['short-cut-set', 'tiny-dialog-box'] + let current = target.parentElement + + while (current && current !== document.body) { + if (current.classList && + targetClasses.some(className => current.classList.contains(className))) { + return true + } + current = current.parentElement + } + + return false + }
Line range hint
367-419: Refactor style handling logic for better maintainabilityThe
Alignclass manually handles style conversion and positioning calculations. Consider using Vue's built-in style binding capabilities and computed properties for better maintainability.Consider this alternative approach:
- class Align { - // ... existing implementation - styleObj2Str = (styleObj) => { - return Object.entries(styleObj) - .map(([key, value]) => { - const num = Number(value) - if (Number.isNaN(num)) { - return `${key}:${value}` - } - const val = positions.isHorizontal(key) ? num - SELECTION_BORDER_WIDTH : num - return `${key}:${val}px` - }) - .join(';') - } - } + const createAlignStyles = (options) => { + return computed(() => { + const { alignLeft, horizontalValue, alignTop, verticalValue } = options + return { + left: alignLeft ? `${horizontalValue}px` : 'unset', + right: !alignLeft ? `${horizontalValue}px` : 'unset', + top: alignTop ? `${verticalValue}px` : 'unset', + bottom: !alignTop ? `${verticalValue}px` : 'unset' + } + }) + }This approach:
- Leverages Vue's reactivity system
- Simplifies style management
- Improves code maintainability
674-674: Remove redundant class selectorThe selector
.short-cut-set.short-cut-setcontains a duplicated class name which is unnecessary.- .short-cut-set.short-cut-set.tiny-popper.tiny-popover { + .short-cut-set.tiny-popper.tiny-popover {
Line range hint
676-736: Use CSS variables for consistent themingThe resize handles use hardcoded color values which should be replaced with CSS variables for consistent theming.
.drag-resize { // ... - background-color: #409eff; + background-color: var(--ti-lowcode-resize-handle-color); cursor: pointer; // ... }
Line range hint
1-736: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainabilityWhile the component effectively handles canvas interactions, consider the following architectural improvements:
- Extract the positioning logic into a composable function for better reusability
- Split the component into smaller sub-components for better maintainability
- Add proper TypeScript types for props and events
- Document the component's API and usage patterns
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these architectural improvements?
packages/theme/light/canvas.less (1)
4-6: Consider using semantic variables for hover line background colorsCurrently, the variables
--te-base-green-140and--te-base-red-140are used directly for hover line backgrounds. To improve maintainability and readability, consider using semantic variables that represent their purpose, such as--te-common-hover-success-bgand--te-common-hover-error-bg.packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less (1)
137-139: Consider adding border-radius for consistent styling.While the background and color changes look good, consider adding a border-radius for better visual consistency with other components.
.tiny-popover.tiny-popover.option-popper { background: var(--te-common-bg-popover); border: 1px solid transparent; color: var(--te-common-text-secondary); + border-radius: var(--te-base-border-radius-1); padding: 0px 8px 12px;packages/theme/base/src/common.less (1)
11-19: Consider documenting color contrast ratios.While the text color hierarchy is well-defined, it would be helpful to document the expected contrast ratios for accessibility.
// 文本色 - --te-common-text-primary: var(--te-base-gray-90); // 一级文本色-重要信息/标题颜色/输入类文本颜色 #191919 + --te-common-text-primary: var(--te-base-gray-90); // 一级文本色-重要信息/标题颜色/输入类文本颜色 #191919 (contrast ratio >= 4.5:1) - --te-common-text-secondary: var(--te-base-gray-70); // 二级文本色-次要信息/表单标签颜色/选块按钮默认色 #595959 + --te-common-text-secondary: var(--te-base-gray-70); // 二级文本色-次要信息/表单标签颜色/选块按钮默认色 #595959 (contrast ratio >= 3:1)packages/theme/base/src/component-common.less (2)
808-822: Document the new guide component.The new
.tiny-guidecomponent has been added with proper theming support. Consider adding documentation for its usage.Would you like me to help create documentation for the new guide component?
474-476: Ensure consistent box-shadow usage.The popover and tooltip components use different box-shadow values. Consider standardizing them:
.tiny-popover.tiny-popover.tiny-popper[x-placement] { background-color: var(--te-common-bg-popover); border: 0; - box-shadow: 0 8px 24px 0 var(--te-base-box-shadow-rgba-2); + box-shadow: 0 0 20px 0 var(--te-base-box-shadow-rgba-2); }Also applies to: 623-627
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
designer-demo/src/configurators/MyInputConfigurator.vue(1 hunks)packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasAction.vue(1 hunks)packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasDivider.vue(2 hunks)packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasResizeBorder.vue(1 hunks)packages/canvas/container/src/components/shortCutPopover.vue(4 hunks)packages/canvas/layout/src/CanvasLayout.vue(1 hunks)packages/common/component/SearchEmpty.vue(1 hunks)packages/settings/styles/src/components/inputs/ResetButton.vue(1 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/base.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/common.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/component-common.less(15 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less(5 hunks)packages/theme/dark/canvas.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/dark/setting-style.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/light/canvas.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/light/setting-style.less(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- packages/settings/styles/src/components/inputs/ResetButton.vue
- packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasDivider.vue
- packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasResizeBorder.vue
- packages/canvas/container/src/components/shortCutPopover.vue
🔇 Additional comments (14)
packages/canvas/layout/src/CanvasLayout.vue (1)
24-24: LGTM! Background variable change aligns with standardization effort.
The change from a specific canvas variable to a common background variable aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing theme variables.
packages/common/component/SearchEmpty.vue (2)
26-28: LGTM: Icon styling follows best practices
The removal of explicit color property for .empty-icon (mentioned in the AI summary) is actually beneficial, as it allows the SVG icon to inherit its color from the parent context, making it more flexible with different themes.
32-32: Verify the new CSS variable definition
The change from --te-base-text-color-3 to --te-common-text-weaken aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing common variables across themes.
Let's verify the new variable is properly defined and consistently used:
✅ Verification successful
CSS variable change is properly defined and consistently used
The new variable --te-common-text-weaken is well-defined in the base theme:
- Defined in
packages/theme/base/src/common.lessfor both light theme (mapped to--te-base-gray-60) and dark theme (mapped to--te-base-gray-120) - Widely used across multiple components for weakened text colors
- No remaining references to the old variable
--te-base-text-color-3were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the definition and usage of the new CSS variable
# Check for the definition of the new variable
echo "Checking for variable definition:"
rg --type less "te-common-text-weaken"
# Check for similar text color migrations
echo -e "\nChecking for similar variable transitions:"
rg --type less "te-base-text-color-3"
Length of output: 2572
designer-demo/src/configurators/MyInputConfigurator.vue (1)
60-60: LGTM! Color variable update aligns with theme standardization
The change from var(--ti-lowcode-dialog-font-color) to var(--te-common-text-primary) follows the PR's objective of standardizing theme variables.
packages/theme/dark/setting-style.less (1)
2-6: LGTM!
The updated variables correctly reference the new common theme variables, enhancing consistency in the dark theme settings.
packages/theme/light/setting-style.less (1)
2-6: LGTM!
The variable updates align with the theming modifications and ensure consistency in the light theme settings.
packages/theme/light/canvas.less (1)
18-26: LGTM!
The updated variables enhance consistency by referencing common theme variables, improving maintainability across the light theme.
packages/theme/dark/canvas.less (2)
3-16: Ensure consistency of canvas corner mark styles
The corner mark variables have been updated to reference new common variables. Please verify that these changes maintain the intended visual differences between the dark and light themes, especially for variables noted with comments like // 暗色和亮色存在差异 (differences between dark and light themes).
22-23: Verify consistency of menu item styles between themes
In the dark theme:
--ti-lowcode-canvas-menu-bgis set tovar(--te-common-bg-container).--ti-lowcode-canvas-menu-item-coloris set tovar(--te-common-text-secondary).
In the light theme, these variables have different values:
--ti-lowcode-canvas-menu-bgisvar(--te-common-bg-default).--ti-lowcode-canvas-menu-item-colorisvar(--te-common-text-primary).
Please confirm that these differences are intentional and provide the desired user experience across both themes.
packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less (3)
53-53: LGTM: Text color update aligns with new theming system.
The change to use var(--te-common-text-primary) for body text color follows the new variable naming convention.
213-220: LGTM: Form styling updates are consistent.
The form item styling changes align with the new theming system, using appropriate variables for text and border colors.
Line range hint 143-180: Verify popover arrow colors across themes.
The arrow colors have been updated to use transparent borders with only one side colored. Ensure this works correctly in both light and dark themes.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to understand how popper arrows are styled across themes and check for any border color variable usage patterns.
We need to verify if the --te-common-bg-popover variable is properly defined in both light and dark themes, and also examine any existing popper arrow implementations to ensure consistency.
Popper arrow colors are properly implemented across themes
The verification shows that:
- The
--te-common-bg-popovervariable is properly defined in both light theme (--te-base-gray-0/ #fff) and dark theme (--te-base-gray-170/ #0F1115) - The implementation in
base-config-page.lesscorrectly uses transparent borders with directional coloring using--te-common-bg-popover - This approach is consistent with other popper arrow implementations in the codebase, where similar directional coloring patterns are used
The changes are safe and will work correctly in both light and dark themes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the arrow colors are consistently defined across themes
rg --type=less "popper__arrow.*border.*color" packages/theme/
Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for popper arrow styles in theme files
rg --type=less "popper__arrow" packages/theme/
# Also search for any border color definitions in theme files
rg --type=less "border.*color.*var\(--te-" packages/theme/
Length of output: 5517
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the theme variable definitions for --te-common-bg-popover
rg --type=less "te-common-bg-popover" packages/theme/
# Also check for any existing popper arrow implementations in component-common.less
cat packages/theme/base/src/component-common.less | grep -A 10 "popper__arrow"
Length of output: 2741
packages/theme/base/src/common.less (2)
4-8: LGTM: Functional colors are well-defined.
The functional colors (success, warning, error, info) use consistent base variables and include helpful comments.
60-105: Verify dark theme color accessibility.
The dark theme colors need verification for proper contrast ratios and accessibility standards.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the color values and their usage in more detail.
Let me analyze the color values in the theme file more specifically.
Based on the analysis of the color values in the dark theme, I can now provide a final response:
Dark theme color combinations meet accessibility standards
The dark theme implementation shows appropriate contrast ratios:
- Primary text (#F0F0F0) on dark backgrounds (#212329, #2A2C31) exceeds WCAG AA requirements with ratio >7:1
- Secondary text (#B4B5B8) and disabled text (#4D4E52) maintain sufficient contrast
- Interactive elements use bright blue (#1476FF) that provides good visibility
- Error/warning states use high-contrast colors (#F23030, #FF8800)
- The hierarchical text color system (primary/secondary/weaken) ensures proper visual distinction
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any color contrast testing tools or documentation
rg -l "contrast|accessibility|a11y" .
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the CSS file found to see if it contains any contrast-related guidelines
cat ./mockServer/src/assets/css/0.1.20/index.css | grep -A 5 -B 5 "contrast\|accessibility\|a11y"
# Look for any documentation files that might contain accessibility guidelines
fd -e md -e txt | xargs grep -l "contrast\|accessibility\|a11y"
# Search for any test files related to theme or colors
fd -e test.js -e test.ts -e spec.js -e spec.ts | xargs grep -l "contrast\|accessibility\|color"
# Check if there are any theme configuration files that might contain accessibility settings
fd -e theme.js -e theme.ts -e theme.config.js | xargs grep -l "contrast\|accessibility\|color"
Length of output: 6608
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the base color variables that are referenced in common.less
fd -g "*.less" | xargs grep -l "te-base-"
# After finding the base colors, let's see their values
fd -g "*.less" | xargs grep "te-base-.*-[0-9]"
# Look for any color-related documentation in the theme package
fd . packages/theme -e md -e txt | xargs grep -l "color\|theme"
Length of output: 29047
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasAction.vue (1)
674-676: Consider using theme variables for padding.While the popover styling is correct, consider using theme spacing variables for the padding value to maintain consistency with the design system.
.short-cut-set.short-cut-set.tiny-popper.tiny-popover { - padding: 10px; + padding: var(--te-common-vertical-item-spacing-normal); }packages/theme/base/src/component-common.less (2)
108-108: Consider visual separation alternativesRemoving the bottom border might affect the visual separation between collapse items. While using divider colors for remaining borders is good, consider:
- Adding padding or margin for visual separation
- Using background contrast between items
- Adding a subtle box-shadow
Also applies to: 134-135
169-173: Enhance hover state contrastWhile the background colors are properly defined using CSS variables, consider increasing the contrast between default and hover states for better user experience.
.tiny-tree-node__content-box { color: var(--te-common-text-primary); padding: 0 12px 0 4px; background-color: var(--te-common-bg-default); &:hover { - background-color: var(--te-common-bg-container); + background-color: var(--te-common-bg-hover); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
designer-demo/src/configurators/MyInputConfigurator.vue(1 hunks)packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasAction.vue(1 hunks)packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasDivider.vue(2 hunks)packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasResizeBorder.vue(1 hunks)packages/canvas/container/src/components/shortCutPopover.vue(4 hunks)packages/canvas/layout/src/CanvasLayout.vue(1 hunks)packages/common/component/SearchEmpty.vue(1 hunks)packages/settings/styles/src/components/inputs/ResetButton.vue(1 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/base.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/common.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/component-common.less(15 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less(5 hunks)packages/theme/dark/canvas.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/dark/setting-style.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/light/canvas.less(2 hunks)packages/theme/light/setting-style.less(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- packages/settings/styles/src/components/inputs/ResetButton.vue
- designer-demo/src/configurators/MyInputConfigurator.vue
- packages/canvas/container/src/components/CanvasDivider.vue
- packages/canvas/container/src/components/shortCutPopover.vue
- packages/theme/dark/setting-style.less
🔇 Additional comments (13)
packages/canvas/layout/src/CanvasLayout.vue (2)
24-24: LGTM! Variable change aligns with theme standardization.
The change from a specific canvas variable to a common background variable aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing theme variables.
Line range hint 24-36: Verify consistency of variable naming conventions.
While --te-common-bg-container follows the new convention, the component still uses --ti-lowcode-breadcrumb-hover-bg. Consider if this should also be migrated to the new variable system.
Consider creating a migration plan to:
- Document all theme variables that need to be migrated
- Ensure consistent naming patterns across all variables
- Update remaining
--ti-lowcode-prefixed variables to use common variables where appropriate
packages/theme/light/setting-style.less (1)
2-6: Variables Updated to New Theming System
The CSS variables have been successfully updated to use the new --te-common-* variables, aligning with the updated theming conventions. This enhances consistency and maintainability across the codebase.
packages/common/component/SearchEmpty.vue (1)
32-32: Updated Text Color Aligns with New Theming Conventions
The .empty-text class color is updated to var(--te-common-text-weaken), which adheres to the new theming variables and ensures visual consistency.
packages/theme/light/canvas.less (1)
Line range hint 4-26: Variables Updated to New Theming Conventions Appropriately
The canvas styles have been updated to use the new --te-* variables, aligning with the updated theming strategy. Directly using base variables where applicable enhances consistency between light and dark themes.
packages/theme/dark/canvas.less (1)
3-25: Canvas Variables Updated to Reflect New Dark Theme Conventions
The styles have been updated to use --te-* variables, ensuring consistency with the new theming system. Utilizing base variables directly is appropriate for shared styles across themes.
packages/theme/base/src/page/base-config-page.less (2)
137-139: LGTM: Consistent use of theme variables for popover styling.
The changes properly utilize the common theme variables for background, border, and text colors, ensuring consistent theming across popovers.
Also applies to: 143-146, 157-159, 166-169, 177-180
213-213: LGTM: Proper color variable usage for form elements.
The changes correctly implement theme variables for form elements, maintaining visual consistency:
- Text colors for form labels
- Border colors for input fields
- Hover/focus states
Also applies to: 217-220, 251-251
packages/theme/base/src/common.less (3)
4-8: LGTM: Well-structured functional color definitions.
The functional colors are properly mapped to base color variables with clear documentation of their purposes.
11-19: LGTM: Comprehensive text color system.
The text color system is well-organized with clear hierarchy:
- Primary text for important information
- Secondary text for labels
- Weaken text for hints
- Proper contrast in both light and dark themes
Also applies to: 66-74
36-51: LGTM: Complete background color system with semantic naming.
The background color system is well-structured with clear use cases:
- Primary and secondary button backgrounds
- Container and popover backgrounds
- Disabled states
- Error states
Also applies to: 91-105
packages/theme/base/src/component-common.less (2)
805-822: LGTM! Well-structured guide component styles
The guide component implementation:
- Uses consistent background colors
- Properly handles arrow colors for all placements
- Maintains theme consistency
89-89: Verify input readability with transparent background
Setting the input background to transparent might affect text readability depending on the parent element's background color. Consider adding a contrast test to ensure text remains readable across different parent backgrounds.
Consider defining a minimum contrast ratio requirement in the theme documentation to maintain accessibility standards.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the input background being set to transparent is part of a consistent theme styling approach where parent elements provide the necessary background colors and contrast. Specifically:
- The input is part of a form component that has proper background colors defined:
- Parent elements use CSS variables like
--te-common-bg-default,--te-common-bg-containeretc. - The theme system handles contrast through layered backgrounds
- Error states have specific background colors defined (e.g.
--ti-lowcode-input-error-bg)
- The transparent background is intentional to allow proper styling inheritance from parent containers while maintaining theme consistency.
Input background transparency is correctly implemented
The transparent background is part of the theming system design and does not pose readability issues since:
- Parent containers provide appropriate background colors through CSS variables
- Error states and other variations have specific background colors defined
- The theme system handles contrast requirements through layered backgrounds
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all parent elements that might contain .tiny-input
rg -l "tiny-input" | xargs rg -A 5 "background|bg-color"
Length of output: 125057
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/theme/base/src/base.less (1)
7-241: Consider adding CSS custom property fallbacksWhile the color system is well-structured, it would be beneficial to add fallback values for the CSS custom properties to ensure graceful degradation in unsupported browsers.
Example implementation:
:root { - --te-base-gray-0: #fff; + --te-base-gray-0: #fff; /* Fallback */ + --te-base-gray-0: var(--te-base-gray-0, #fff);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/theme/base/src/base.less(1 hunks)packages/theme/base/src/component-common.less(15 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/theme/base/src/component-common.less
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/theme/base/src/base.less (5)
7-25: LGTM: Well-structured grayscale system
The grayscale system is well-organized with consistent increments and follows a logical progression from white (0) to black (100), with additional shades (110-170) for extended use cases.
240-241: LGTM: Box shadow variables are well-defined
The box shadow RGBA values are appropriately defined with semantic naming and consistent opacity values.
98-101:
Fix duplicate color value in lime scale
The variable --te-base-lime-130 at line 101 has the same value #3b4d00 as --te-base-lime-100 at line 98. This appears to be unintentional and breaks the color progression pattern.
Consider adjusting the value to maintain a consistent lightness progression in the lime scale.
165-174:
Fix inconsistent blue scale progression
The blue scale has a logical break in its progression:
- Line 165:
--te-base-blue-10: #f0f7ff(very light) - Line 174:
--te-base-blue-100: #001a4a(very dark)
This creates a non-linear progression in the blue color scale.
Consider reordering the values to maintain a consistent lightness progression.
28-238: Consider adding color contrast validation
The color system is comprehensive, but it would be beneficial to validate color contrast ratios, especially for commonly paired combinations (e.g., text colors on background colors) to ensure WCAG compliance.
Run the following script to identify potential color contrast issues:
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
此pr做的事情：
剩余要做的事情：
举例：
1.直接改成common变量，等待之后调整
2.一步到位，看是哪一个模块的，然后新增模块变量，模块变量的值是common变量，然后vue文件使用的是模块变量。
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores