OCPBUGS-21751: update ip_whitelist entry #66299
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
jira/valid-reference
|
@jldohmann: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-21751, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/S
|
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/28631 |
|
@melvinjoseph86 could you PTAL for QE ack? thank you! |
jldohmann
added
the
peer-review-needed
mburke5678
added
peer-review-in-progress
|
/lgtm |
| [.small] | ||
| -- | ||
| 1. If the number of IP addresses and CIDR ranges in an allowlist exceeds 64, they are written into a separate file that is then referenced from `haproxy.config`. | ||
| + | ||
| [NOTE] | ||
| ==== | ||
| To ensure that the addresses are written to the allowlist, check that the full list of CIDR ranges are listed in the Ingress Controller configuration file. The etcd object size limit restricts how large a route annotation can be. Because of this, it creates a threshold for the maximum number of IP addresses and CIDR ranges that you can include in an allowlist. | ||
| ==== | ||
| -- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
my suggestion is to add this portion just after line 44 to have a continuation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The technical limitations of how tables are currently rendering makes content unreadable inside a cell, but I can take a look at a later time whenever the issue is resolved
jldohmann
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-21751
branch
from
7af7bee to
6807024
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
@jldohmann: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-21751 is in an unrecognized state (Verified) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.11 |
|
@jldohmann: new pull request created: #66482 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@jldohmann: new pull request created: #66483 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@jldohmann: new pull request created: #66484 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@jldohmann: new pull request created: #66485 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Version(s): 4.11+
Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-21751
Link to docs preview: https://66299--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/routes/route-configuration#nw-route-specific-annotations_route-configuration
QE review:
Additional information: