Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] Fix bug where document embedding fails to be generated due to document has dot in field name #1076

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 2.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yizheliu-amazon
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Backport 5b9f43b from #1062

Backport fea0a7f from #1074

Related Issues

N/A

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • API changes companion pull request created.
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@yizheliu-amazon
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR must be merged after another backport PR #1065 is merged.

@heemin32
Copy link
Collaborator

heemin32 commented Jan 9, 2025

@yizheliu-amazon could you rebase the PR to fix the test failure?

…t has dot in field name (opensearch-project#1062)

* Fix bug where document embedding fails to be generated due to document has dot in field name

Signed-off-by: Yizhe Liu <[email protected]>

* Address comments

Signed-off-by: Yizhe Liu <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Yizhe Liu <[email protected]>
@yizheliu-amazon yizheliu-amazon force-pushed the backport/backport-1062-to-2.x branch from e7a93af to d8ef1dc Compare January 10, 2025 01:33
@yizheliu-amazon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Have rebased on latest commit of branch 2.x

Copy link
Collaborator

@heemin32 heemin32 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants